#BoycottNRA

#2,676
#2,676
Boston Vol said:
Ok. I’ll tell you what, tell Democrats to run on a platform of raising taxes on the “rich” and gun control. See how that works out for them.
Click to expand...

Oh and add this to the platform too lol....

The deputy chairman of the Democratic National Committee says he hopes to be a wage trailblazer and is calling for a "maximum wage" for CEOs.

Rep. Keith Ellison (Minn.) said on "Interviews for Resistance" that workplace leaders who make far more money than rank-and-file employees should be taxed more.

"Why do [CEOs] have to make more than 21 times your average worker? The CEO of McDonald's. You're telling me they can't make it on ... I don't know, if the workers are making $15 an hour ... Why can't the CEO make $300 an hour," Ellison asked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,677
#2,677
6 months ago my 50 year old neighbor owned zero guns. I target practice off my back porch and he always comes over being curious and asks a lot of questions. I got home one day and he was shooting off his back porch. He now owns a 9mm pistol and an AR-15.

Thats what a totally organic movement looks like..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#2,678
#2,678
And I also recently purchased a scary black rifle in 450 Bushmaster. 450 BM round next to 223 for comparison.
 

Attachments

  • 20180324_155048.jpg
    20180324_155048.jpg
    57 KB · Views: 0
#2,679
#2,679
The kids are right and the issue valid. Gun deaths in our country are disproportionately high. The need for more reasonable, rational gun laws exists to anyone not turning a blind eye.

Hunting and fishing are sports declining in popularity, sadly. Future generations will increasingly be isolated from gun use. A bend but don't break approach would be far wiser by the NRA rather than its confrontational style.

For those opposed to banning assault style rifles, large magazines and bump stocks, ask yourself why. If the answer has anything to do with your "rights" as opposed to common sense, you are denying reasonable, rational dialogue on gun control.

It is past time to ban weapons intended for warfare from public hands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#2,681
#2,681
allvol123 said:
Russian collusion. You are looking at it.

The socialists and communists infiltrated American education decades ago and you are witnessing the fruit it bears.
Click to expand...

It’s the strangest thing. They actually believe a foreign government usurped our elelction but then say they don’t see a need for armed citizenry. How the hell does that make sense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,683
#2,683
OuterBanksVol said:
The kids are right and the issue valid. Gun deaths in our country are disproportionately high. The need for more reasonable, rational gun laws exists to anyone not turning a blind eye.

Hunting and fishing are sports declining in popularity, sadly. Future generations will increasingly be isolated from gun use. A bend but don't break approach would be far wiser by the NRA rather than its confrontational style.

For those opposed to banning assault style rifles, large magazines and bump stocks, ask yourself why. If the answer has anything to do with your "rights" as opposed to common sense, you are denying reasonable, rational dialogue on gun control.

It is past time to ban weapons intended for warfare from public hands.
Click to expand...

Disproportionally high in comparison to what? I hope you're not comparing us to other countries because we don't govern there and vice versa.

It would be reasonable and rational for you to define those 2 words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,684
#2,684
OuterBanksVol said:
The kids are right and the issue valid. Gun deaths in our country are disproportionately high. The need for more reasonable, rational gun laws exists to anyone not turning a blind eye.

Hunting and fishing are sports declining in popularity, sadly. Future generations will increasingly be isolated from gun use. A bend but don't break approach would be far wiser by the NRA rather than its confrontational style.

For those opposed to banning assault style rifles, large magazines and bump stocks, ask yourself why. If the answer has anything to do with your "rights" as opposed to common sense, you are denying reasonable, rational dialogue on gun control.

It is past time to ban weapons intended for warfare from public hands.
Click to expand...

.
 

Attachments

  • 57F7FEB9-C2D1-4BA1-8852-79286FD397A6.jpg
    57F7FEB9-C2D1-4BA1-8852-79286FD397A6.jpg
    52.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#2,686
#2,686
OuterBanksVol said:
The kids are right and the issue valid. Gun deaths in our country are disproportionately high. The need for more reasonable, rational gun laws exists to anyone not turning a blind eye.
Click to expand...

You don't even know what laws are on the books now.

Yet, you think we need more...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#2,687
#2,687
TN Ribs said:
I love that you're freaking out about these kids exercising their right to peacefully march.
Click to expand...

And demonstrate how ****ing stupid they are. Your argument would hold more water if you bothered to actually learn what the **** you are talking about. But if you did, you would realize, damn this fight is stupid and then what would you do.
 
#2,688
#2,688
SLICKYINC said:
Disproportionally high in comparison to what? I hope you're not comparing us to other countries because we don't govern there and vice versa.

It would be reasonable and rational for you to define those 2 words.
Click to expand...

So we shouldn't examine or consider policies of other nations? Seems pretty close-minded.

But, yes, we're off the chart in ownership and deaths. I don't believe the concept of widespread gun ownership and reasonable controls are mutually-exclusive concepts.
 

Attachments

  • GUN_SCATTERPLOT_2x.jpg
    GUN_SCATTERPLOT_2x.jpg
    33.7 KB · Views: 4
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,690
#2,690
Days like today certainly provide a brighter outlook on the future. I hope they are planning a similar day in late October.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,692
#2,692
Grand Vol said:
You don't even know what laws are on the books now.

Yet, you think we need more...
Click to expand...

My mantra has been consistent and simple:

1. Ban assault style weapons
2. Ban high capacity magazines
3. Ban bump stocks

Yes, you can make the argument, "oh there's this weapon or that weapon which could be used just as deadly as an assault style weapon." Well that just doesn't hold any water since the majority of these recent mass murders are being effectuated by AR15 style weapons.

This weapon has no rightful place for civilian use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,694
#2,694
OuterBanksVol said:
My mantra has been consistent and simple:

1. Ban assault style weapons
2. Ban high capacity magazines
3. Ban bump stocks

Yes, you can make the argument, "oh there's this weapon or that weapon which could be used just as deadly as an assault style weapon." Well that just doesn't hold any water since the majority of these recent mass murders are being effectuated by AR15 style weapons.

This weapon has no rightful place for civilian use.
Click to expand...

1. You can't define.
2. Is an arbitrary number created by a politician sitting behind a desk that knows ****-all about firearms.
3. Got your wish.

Of course, you never stop at the three. There'll always be "one more, daddy. Just one more!" to you people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,696
#2,696
OuterBanksVol said:
My mantra has been consistent and simple:

1. Ban assault style weapons
2. Ban high capacity magazines
3. Ban bump stocks

Yes, you can make the argument, "oh there's this weapon or that weapon which could be used just as deadly as an assault style weapon." Well that just doesn't hold any water since the majority of these recent mass murders are being effectuated by AR15 style weapons.

This weapon has no rightful place for civilian use.
Click to expand...

1. What’s that?
2. What’s that?
3. What’s that?
 
#2,699
#2,699
OuterBanksVol said:
So we shouldn't examine or consider policies of other nations? Seems pretty close-minded.

But, yes, we're off the chart in ownership and deaths. I don't believe the concept of widespread gun ownership and reasonable controls are mutually-exclusive concepts.
Click to expand...

No, we shouldn't. Seems like you just want to pick whatever arbitrary number you want to help your argument hold up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top