#BoycottNRA

#3,276
#3,276
The organizers claimed 800k. It came later estimates were around 210k

The Trump inauguration has of course widely varying claims. One number that is quantifiable is the number of metro riders that was at 570k.

I have no idea why youre grasping st this though. It’s a meaningless comparison. But the Trump inauguration did have more present.
 
#3,277
#3,277
luthervol said:
More data.
Guys, you don't have to be stupid to be a man, so if you're just pretending to be stupid to mask your insecurities, you don't have to continue. On the other hand, if you truly are as stupid as portrayed......
Click to expand...

The use of insecurity is funny.
 
#3,278
#3,278
luthervol said:
More data.
Guys, you don't have to be stupid to be a man, so if you're just pretending to be stupid to mask your insecurities, you don't have to continue. On the other hand, if you truly are as stupid as portrayed......
Click to expand...

BeecherVol said:
The use of insecurity is funny.
Click to expand...

Any one else notice how the bolded just seems to flow?
 
#3,279
#3,279
Mick said:
I didn't take you for a single issue voter. lol
Click to expand...

Those attending these rallies appear to be laser focused on one issue and are promising to change things in the midterms regarding it. Seems to be the definition of single issue to me.
 
#3,282
#3,282
luthervol said:
Some more testosterone humor. I've got a couple of theories I'm working on. You guys have been great about supplying some of the data I need.

I have concluded that the only people who make testosterone comments are those who are themselves deficient in either testosterone, IQ, or both.

If a = % of testosterone compared to the norm, and b = IQ, then if a + b < 180 you are a likely candidate to make such comments.

I'm not to the point of concluding a negative correlation because of some clear observable data.
Click to expand...

Dude, you need to figure out how to draw that triangle before you get into anymore math. Your theories just don't cut it.....too many "and then a miracle occurs" steps for me.
 
#3,286
#3,286
luthervol said:
I think we're all second amendment advocates. I know I am. It's great when interpreted in the context of today's world, which was always the intent.
Click to expand...

I must have missed the part of the constitution's fine print that said "Feel free to change it's meaning to fit what ever flavor of the day happens to be in vogue."
 
#3,288
#3,288
Mick said:
NRA | Activate Your Benefits Today!

the NRA is thought to use a few tricks to pad its numbers, such as keeping dead lifetime members on its rolls. It also gives away free memberships to buyers of select gun brands. (Taurus, a major NRA backer, offers one-year memberships to its customers.)

The NRA Says It Has 5 Million Members. Its Magazines Tell Another Story. – Mother Jones
Click to expand...

OMG you are ****ing stupid. Taurus is giving away the memberships, not the NRA. And did you even read the article? I don't think it supports your story very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,292
#3,292
82_VOL_83 said:
OMG you are ****ing stupid. Taurus is giving away the memberships, not the NRA. And did you even read the article? I don't think it supports your story very well.
Click to expand...

Do they sell guns? Do you think they are on the hook for the full amount?
 
#3,294
#3,294
Mick said:
Do they sell guns? Do you think they are on the hook for the full amount?
Click to expand...

Does who sell guns....Taurus? Yes they do. At the markup they get, they can easily give away $10 to $35 for a one year membership. The associate membership is $10. Are you really that naive?
 
#3,296
#3,296
Mick said:
Do they sell guns? Do you think they are on the hook for the full amount?
Click to expand...

Are you really a chick? You argue like a scorned emotional one and that probably pisses the rational ones off

They give away free memberships!

Well big deal you have to buy a gun but you still don’t pay for the membership!

Well the NRA probably doesn’t get full membership price!
 
Last edited:
#3,297
#3,297
luthervol said:
I think we're all second amendment advocates. I know I am. It's great when interpreted in the context of today's world, which was always the intent.
Click to expand...

Was that before or after "we" couldn't ban all guns or take them from law abiding citizens who legally purchased them?

Every blue moon you make a semi decent point that even some gun nuts can understand. Then you go goofy a blow all that up.
 
#3,298
#3,298
luthervol said:
Imagine how foolish the Japanese and Australians most be feeling.
Click to expand...

Cherry picking again? What about the French? How are they feeling? They have stricter gun laws than Japan and Australia. Or let’s take a country that encourages guns. Let’s look at how Switzerland is doing. Why are you not mentioning the gun control Mecca of Mexico?
 
#3,299
#3,299
luthervol said:
I think we're all second amendment advocates. I know I am. It's great when interpreted in the context of today's world, which was always the intent.
Click to expand...

But the led isn’t trying to take guns away. And don’t give me the BS of today’s context otherwise the internet should be banned in regards to free speech.
 

Attachments

  • 35F92DBF-3FFD-4C85-980C-902CB15518D8.jpg
    35F92DBF-3FFD-4C85-980C-902CB15518D8.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 0
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top