Boycott ABC, ESPN & All Disney Products and Properties

#355
#355
President Donald Trump has said TV networks that air overly-critical commentary of him aren't allowed to do so and should have their licenses taken away.

"All they do is hit Trump," he told reporters on Air Force One Thursday on the return trip from a state visit to the U.K. "They're licensed. They're not allowed to do that."

Earlier during the plane-based press conference the president said "maybe their license should be taken away," in reference to those networks that aren't positive about him.
 
#360
#360
MontyPython said:
Heh. I agree with him regarding this issue. I agree with lots of people I don't like. I disagree with lots of people I do like.

The PF provides views from all angles. That's a good thing.

And it's all possible because of the 1st Amendment.

You may love Trump and want him to be all powerful and usurp Congressional powers and violate every established law on the books, but just remember... when he's gone, the Dems will probably take back the White House. At which point your support of an American dictatorship will no doubt end.
Click to expand...
Name one person that wants this. Especially on this forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyVolette
#363
#363
Howard Stern, whose show broadcasts on SiriusXM Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday mornings, said he was concerned about the Trump administration’s response. He related current events to his off-and-on battles with the FCC throughout his career.

“I just know when the government begins to interfere, when the government says, ‘I’m not pleased with you, so we’re gonna orchestrate a way to silence you,’ it’s the wrong direction for our country,” Stern said Monday. “And I should know: I’ve been involved in something like this.”

Stern said he felt ABC was put in an unfortunate position, but he called on Disney’s executive leadership to take a stand in support for Kimmel and free speech. In the meantime, Stern said he was taking the limited actions he could to stand against Disney and ABC’s decision.

“Someone’s got to step up and be f***ing saying, ‘Hey, enough, we’re not gonna bow,’” Stern said. “Now it might sound stupid, but the thing I did this morning, I’m canceling my Disney+. I’m trying to say with the pocketbook that I do not support what they’re doing with Jimmy.”
 
#364
#364
MontyPython said:
Howard Stern, whose show broadcasts on SiriusXM Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday mornings, said he was concerned about the Trump administration’s response. He related current events to his off-and-on battles with the FCC throughout his career.

“I just know when the government begins to interfere, when the government says, ‘I’m not pleased with you, so we’re gonna orchestrate a way to silence you,’ it’s the wrong direction for our country,” Stern said Monday. “And I should know: I’ve been involved in something like this.”

Stern said he felt ABC was put in an unfortunate position, but he called on Disney’s executive leadership to take a stand in support for Kimmel and free speech. In the meantime, Stern said he was taking the limited actions he could to stand against Disney and ABC’s decision.

“Someone’s got to step up and be f***ing saying, ‘Hey, enough, we’re not gonna bow,’” Stern said. “Now it might sound stupid, but the thing I did this morning, I’m canceling my Disney+. I’m trying to say with the pocketbook that I do not support what they’re doing with Jimmy.”
Click to expand...

I wouldn’t be using HS as an example. He’s all for government interference and heavy handiness. In other words he’s a hypocrite.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts...9/09/howard-stern-unvaccinated-freedom-covid/
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, TrumpedUpVol, SpaceCoastVol and 1 other person
#366
#366
MontyPython said:
Howard Stern, whose show broadcasts on SiriusXM Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday mornings, said he was concerned about the Trump administration’s response. He related current events to his off-and-on battles with the FCC throughout his career.

“I just know when the government begins to interfere, when the government says, ‘I’m not pleased with you, so we’re gonna orchestrate a way to silence you,’ it’s the wrong direction for our country,” Stern said Monday. “And I should know: I’ve been involved in something like this.”

Stern said he felt ABC was put in an unfortunate position, but he called on Disney’s executive leadership to take a stand in support for Kimmel and free speech. In the meantime, Stern said he was taking the limited actions he could to stand against Disney and ABC’s decision.

“Someone’s got to step up and be f***ing saying, ‘Hey, enough, we’re not gonna bow,’” Stern said. “Now it might sound stupid, but the thing I did this morning, I’m canceling my Disney+. I’m trying to say with the pocketbook that I do not support what they’re doing with Jimmy.”
Click to expand...
Stern, like some here, is completely ignoring the affiliates dissatisfaction with Kimmel. The FCC and Carr got over their skis with statements. ABC is rightfully concerned with those statements. Additionally, JK has not be fired. The show is suspended indefinitely.

Other folks critical of Trump are having no issues and on broadcast TV without concerns.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#367
#367
McDad said:
Stern, like some here, is completely ignoring the affiliates dissatisfaction with Kimmel. The FCC and Carr got over their skis with statements. ABC is rightfully concerned with those statements. Additionally, JK has not be fired. The show is suspended indefinitely.

Other folks critical of Trump are having no issues and on broadcast TV are not having issues.
Click to expand...

Besides all the lawsuits, of course.

And besides the WH reporters that are getting shut out.

And besides legal immigrants who express that it's a bad thing to kill Palestinian children.

But other than that (and probably some **** I'm forgetting about), yeah.
 
#368
#368
McDad said:
Stern, like some here, is completely ignoring the affiliates dissatisfaction with Kimmel. The FCC and Carr got over their skis with statements. ABC is rightfully concerned with those statements. Additionally, JK has not be fired. The show is suspended indefinitely.

Other folks critical of Trump are having no issues and on broadcast TV without concerns.
Click to expand...

Let's talk about this duck.

First

Nexstar Media Group, which operates ABC affiliates in approximately 24 markets, refused to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel Live! episodes following Jimmy Kimmel's controversial monologues about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The primary reason Nexstar provided was concern over potential FCC regulatory consequences, specifically citing risks to their broadcast licenses. They feared that airing the show could be seen as endorsing "news distortion" or "offensive content," especially after FCC Chairman Brendan Carr publicly warned that affiliates airing such content could face license revocation. Additionally, Nexstar was motivated by the need to protect its pending $6.2 billion merger with Tegna, which required FCC approval, making them cautious about any actions that could jeopardize regulatory favor.

Second

Sinclair Broadcast Group, a major operator of ABC affiliates, refused to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel Live! episodes following Jimmy Kimmel's controversial monologues about the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 15, 2025. The primary reason Sinclair provided was to avoid potential FCC regulatory scrutiny and license challenges. Like Nexstar Media Group, Sinclair cited concerns about FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's public warnings that affiliates airing content deemed "news distortion" or "offensive" could face license revocation. Sinclair, known for its conservative-leaning editorial stance, also faced pressure from its audience and advertisers, who viewed Kimmel's remarks as inflammatory. This decision was further influenced by Sinclair's desire to maintain favorable relations with the FCC, especially amid ongoing regulatory considerations for their broadcast operations.

Third

There is no direct public quote from Sinclair Broadcast Group explicitly citing FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's warnings about "news distortion" or "offensive" content leading to license revocation in the context of their decision to refuse broadcasting Jimmy Kimmel Live!. However, industry sources and reports indicate Sinclair's decision was influenced by Carr's broader statements, such as his comments on a conservative podcast on September 17, 2025, where he stated:

"The FCC will not tolerate affiliates that air garbage or distort the news in ways that inflame tensions. Licenses are a privilege, not a right, and we’re looking closely at compliance."
Click to expand...

While Sinclair did not issue a public statement directly quoting Carr, their internal rationale, as reported by media outlets like The Hollywood Reporter and Variety, pointed to fears of FCC regulatory repercussions, particularly after Carr’s remarks. Sinclair's decision was described as a precautionary move to avoid being targeted in what they perceived as a politically charged FCC environment, especially given their significant portfolio of ABC affiliates and ongoing regulatory obligations.

And lastly and most importantly...

Did Sinclair Broadcast Group refuse to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel before or after FCC Chairman Carr's comments on a conservative podcast on September 17, 2025?

After. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr made his comments on the conservative podcast The Benny Show (hosted by Benny Johnson) during the afternoon of September 17, 2025, where he criticized Jimmy Kimmel's remarks as "the sickest conduct possible" and warned that broadcasters could face FCC action like fines or license revocation if they continued airing the show, stating, "We can do this the easy way or the hard way." Sinclair Broadcast Group's announcement to preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live! followed later that evening, around 10:49 p.m. GMT (5:49 p.m. PDT), as evidenced by their official X post and press release explicitly referencing "FCC Chairman Carr’s remarks today" in support of their decision. This sequence—Carr's podcast first, then Sinclair's response—is corroborated across reports from Variety, Deadline, The New York Times, and NPR, which describe the affiliates' moves as a direct reaction to Carr's threats amid their own regulatory interests (e.g., Sinclair's push for FCC approvals on ownership and standards). The preemption began "beginning tonight" (September 17), affecting their ABC affiliates in about 30 markets.

A more detailed timeline:

Timeline on September 17, 2025​

  • Early Afternoon (around 1:00–2:00 PM ET / 17:00–18:00 GMT): Carr appeared on Benny Johnson's podcast, where he condemned Kimmel's remarks as "truly sick" and warned of potential FCC actions against ABC, Disney, and affiliates for airing "misinformation" or content not in the public interest. He specifically urged affiliates to preempt such programming to avoid license issues. Johnson posted teaser clips starting around 12:00 PM ET (16:00 GMT) and the main segment by 1:00 PM ET (17:00 GMT).
  • Evening (10:49 PM GMT / 6:49 PM ET): Sinclair posted on X announcing they would stop airing the show "until further notice" due to Kimmel's "problematic comments" about Kirk's murder. This came several hours after Carr's podcast and amid growing pressure from conservative backlash. Sinclair's statement explicitly appreciated Carr's "remarks on the same day," indicating awareness of and response to them.
This sequence shows Sinclair's decision was influenced by Carr's warnings, as affiliates like Sinclair and Nexstar (which announced similarly around the same evening) cited FCC risks in their rationales. ABC's full suspension followed on September 18.


If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's probably a duck.

So there it is. The FCC - AKA TRUMP'S f*** CRUDE COMEDIANS - was ultimately responsible for forcing ABC to punish Kimmel.
 
#369
#369
MontyPython said:
Let's talk about this duck.

First

Nexstar Media Group, which operates ABC affiliates in approximately 24 markets, refused to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel Live! episodes following Jimmy Kimmel's controversial monologues about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The primary reason Nexstar provided was concern over potential FCC regulatory consequences, specifically citing risks to their broadcast licenses. They feared that airing the show could be seen as endorsing "news distortion" or "offensive content," especially after FCC Chairman Brendan Carr publicly warned that affiliates airing such content could face license revocation. Additionally, Nexstar was motivated by the need to protect its pending $6.2 billion merger with Tegna, which required FCC approval, making them cautious about any actions that could jeopardize regulatory favor.

Second

Sinclair Broadcast Group, a major operator of ABC affiliates, refused to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel Live! episodes following Jimmy Kimmel's controversial monologues about the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 15, 2025. The primary reason Sinclair provided was to avoid potential FCC regulatory scrutiny and license challenges. Like Nexstar Media Group, Sinclair cited concerns about FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's public warnings that affiliates airing content deemed "news distortion" or "offensive" could face license revocation. Sinclair, known for its conservative-leaning editorial stance, also faced pressure from its audience and advertisers, who viewed Kimmel's remarks as inflammatory. This decision was further influenced by Sinclair's desire to maintain favorable relations with the FCC, especially amid ongoing regulatory considerations for their broadcast operations.

Third

There is no direct public quote from Sinclair Broadcast Group explicitly citing FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's warnings about "news distortion" or "offensive" content leading to license revocation in the context of their decision to refuse broadcasting Jimmy Kimmel Live!. However, industry sources and reports indicate Sinclair's decision was influenced by Carr's broader statements, such as his comments on a conservative podcast on September 17, 2025, where he stated:



While Sinclair did not issue a public statement directly quoting Carr, their internal rationale, as reported by media outlets like The Hollywood Reporter and Variety, pointed to fears of FCC regulatory repercussions, particularly after Carr’s remarks. Sinclair's decision was described as a precautionary move to avoid being targeted in what they perceived as a politically charged FCC environment, especially given their significant portfolio of ABC affiliates and ongoing regulatory obligations.

And lastly and most importantly...

Did Sinclair Broadcast Group refuse to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel before or after FCC Chairman Carr's comments on a conservative podcast on September 17, 2025?

After. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr made his comments on the conservative podcast The Benny Show (hosted by Benny Johnson) during the afternoon of September 17, 2025, where he criticized Jimmy Kimmel's remarks as "the sickest conduct possible" and warned that broadcasters could face FCC action like fines or license revocation if they continued airing the show, stating, "We can do this the easy way or the hard way." Sinclair Broadcast Group's announcement to preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live! followed later that evening, around 10:49 p.m. GMT (5:49 p.m. PDT), as evidenced by their official X post and press release explicitly referencing "FCC Chairman Carr’s remarks today" in support of their decision. This sequence—Carr's podcast first, then Sinclair's response—is corroborated across reports from Variety, Deadline, The New York Times, and NPR, which describe the affiliates' moves as a direct reaction to Carr's threats amid their own regulatory interests (e.g., Sinclair's push for FCC approvals on ownership and standards). The preemption began "beginning tonight" (September 17), affecting their ABC affiliates in about 30 markets.

A more detailed timeline:

Timeline on September 17, 2025​

  • Early Afternoon (around 1:00–2:00 PM ET / 17:00–18:00 GMT): Carr appeared on Benny Johnson's podcast, where he condemned Kimmel's remarks as "truly sick" and warned of potential FCC actions against ABC, Disney, and affiliates for airing "misinformation" or content not in the public interest. He specifically urged affiliates to preempt such programming to avoid license issues. Johnson posted teaser clips starting around 12:00 PM ET (16:00 GMT) and the main segment by 1:00 PM ET (17:00 GMT).
  • Evening (10:49 PM GMT / 6:49 PM ET): Sinclair posted on X announcing they would stop airing the show "until further notice" due to Kimmel's "problematic comments" about Kirk's murder. This came several hours after Carr's podcast and amid growing pressure from conservative backlash. Sinclair's statement explicitly appreciated Carr's "remarks on the same day," indicating awareness of and response to them.
This sequence shows Sinclair's decision was influenced by Carr's warnings, as affiliates like Sinclair and Nexstar (which announced similarly around the same evening) cited FCC risks in their rationales. ABC's full suspension followed on September 18.


If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's probably a duck.

So there it is. The FCC - AKA TRUMP'S f*** CRUDE COMEDIANS - was ultimately responsible for forcing ABC to punish Kimmel.
Click to expand...
I've asked before, and I will ask again in this case, to please provide your search question when you go to AI as a substitute for your own thoughts and understanding.

Some of what you have shared has already been discussed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, hog88 and LouderVol
#370
#370
MontyPython said:
Let's talk about this duck.

First

Nexstar Media Group, which operates ABC affiliates in approximately 24 markets, refused to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel Live! episodes following Jimmy Kimmel's controversial monologues about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The primary reason Nexstar provided was concern over potential FCC regulatory consequences, specifically citing risks to their broadcast licenses. They feared that airing the show could be seen as endorsing "news distortion" or "offensive content," especially after FCC Chairman Brendan Carr publicly warned that affiliates airing such content could face license revocation. Additionally, Nexstar was motivated by the need to protect its pending $6.2 billion merger with Tegna, which required FCC approval, making them cautious about any actions that could jeopardize regulatory favor.

Second

Sinclair Broadcast Group, a major operator of ABC affiliates, refused to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel Live! episodes following Jimmy Kimmel's controversial monologues about the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 15, 2025. The primary reason Sinclair provided was to avoid potential FCC regulatory scrutiny and license challenges. Like Nexstar Media Group, Sinclair cited concerns about FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's public warnings that affiliates airing content deemed "news distortion" or "offensive" could face license revocation. Sinclair, known for its conservative-leaning editorial stance, also faced pressure from its audience and advertisers, who viewed Kimmel's remarks as inflammatory. This decision was further influenced by Sinclair's desire to maintain favorable relations with the FCC, especially amid ongoing regulatory considerations for their broadcast operations.

Third

There is no direct public quote from Sinclair Broadcast Group explicitly citing FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's warnings about "news distortion" or "offensive" content leading to license revocation in the context of their decision to refuse broadcasting Jimmy Kimmel Live!. However, industry sources and reports indicate Sinclair's decision was influenced by Carr's broader statements, such as his comments on a conservative podcast on September 17, 2025, where he stated:



While Sinclair did not issue a public statement directly quoting Carr, their internal rationale, as reported by media outlets like The Hollywood Reporter and Variety, pointed to fears of FCC regulatory repercussions, particularly after Carr’s remarks. Sinclair's decision was described as a precautionary move to avoid being targeted in what they perceived as a politically charged FCC environment, especially given their significant portfolio of ABC affiliates and ongoing regulatory obligations.

And lastly and most importantly...

Did Sinclair Broadcast Group refuse to broadcast Jimmy Kimmel before or after FCC Chairman Carr's comments on a conservative podcast on September 17, 2025?

After. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr made his comments on the conservative podcast The Benny Show (hosted by Benny Johnson) during the afternoon of September 17, 2025, where he criticized Jimmy Kimmel's remarks as "the sickest conduct possible" and warned that broadcasters could face FCC action like fines or license revocation if they continued airing the show, stating, "We can do this the easy way or the hard way." Sinclair Broadcast Group's announcement to preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live! followed later that evening, around 10:49 p.m. GMT (5:49 p.m. PDT), as evidenced by their official X post and press release explicitly referencing "FCC Chairman Carr’s remarks today" in support of their decision. This sequence—Carr's podcast first, then Sinclair's response—is corroborated across reports from Variety, Deadline, The New York Times, and NPR, which describe the affiliates' moves as a direct reaction to Carr's threats amid their own regulatory interests (e.g., Sinclair's push for FCC approvals on ownership and standards). The preemption began "beginning tonight" (September 17), affecting their ABC affiliates in about 30 markets.

A more detailed timeline:

Timeline on September 17, 2025​

  • Early Afternoon (around 1:00–2:00 PM ET / 17:00–18:00 GMT): Carr appeared on Benny Johnson's podcast, where he condemned Kimmel's remarks as "truly sick" and warned of potential FCC actions against ABC, Disney, and affiliates for airing "misinformation" or content not in the public interest. He specifically urged affiliates to preempt such programming to avoid license issues. Johnson posted teaser clips starting around 12:00 PM ET (16:00 GMT) and the main segment by 1:00 PM ET (17:00 GMT).
  • Evening (10:49 PM GMT / 6:49 PM ET): Sinclair posted on X announcing they would stop airing the show "until further notice" due to Kimmel's "problematic comments" about Kirk's murder. This came several hours after Carr's podcast and amid growing pressure from conservative backlash. Sinclair's statement explicitly appreciated Carr's "remarks on the same day," indicating awareness of and response to them.
This sequence shows Sinclair's decision was influenced by Carr's warnings, as affiliates like Sinclair and Nexstar (which announced similarly around the same evening) cited FCC risks in their rationales. ABC's full suspension followed on September 18.


If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's probably a duck.

So there it is. The FCC - AKA TRUMP'S f*** CRUDE COMEDIANS - was ultimately responsible for forcing ABC to punish Kimmel.
Click to expand...
I don't know where you got all that since you didn't source it but let's get it straight from Sinclair:

“Mr. Kimmel’s remarks were inappropriate and deeply insensitive at a critical moment for our country,” said Vice Chairman Jason Smith. “We believe broadcasters have a responsibility to educate and elevate respectful, constructive dialogue in our communities. We appreciate FCC Chairman Carr’s remarks today and this incident highlights the critical need for the FCC to take immediate regulatory action to address control held over local broadcasters by the big national networks.”
Click to expand...

It sure sounds like Sinclair has no problem with Brendan Carr. In fact they want him to get more involved.


Sinclair Says Kimmel Suspension is Not Enough, Calls on FCC and ABC to Take Additional Action - Sinclair, Inc

Sinclair’s ABC stations to air a special in remembrance of Charlie Kirk during Jimmy Kimmel Live timeslot on Friday BALTIMORE – Sinclair, the nation’s largest ABC affiliate group, objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the assassination of Charlie Kirk. As discussed with ABC...
sbgi.net sbgi.net
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#371
#371
Did Hitler force comedians to be fired in the 1930s?

Yes, Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime systematically censored and suppressed humor and satire that criticized the government, leading to the firing (or effective professional banning) of numerous comedians and performers throughout the 1930s. This was part of a broader campaign of cultural control enforced by Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels through the Reich Chamber of Culture, which required all artists to join and adhere to Nazi ideology or face expulsion. Expulsion meant they could no longer work in their profession in Germany. While not every instance involved Hitler personally issuing orders, the regime he led directly orchestrated these purges, often targeting political wit, anti-Nazi satire, and Jewish performers.

Key Examples of Comedians Fired or Banned​

The Nazis began censoring satire almost immediately after seizing power in 1933, viewing humor as a threat to their authority. By the late 1930s, this escalated into explicit purges. Here's a summary of notable cases:


YearComedians/PerformersReason for Firing/BanDetails
1933–1935Jewish cabaret artists (e.g., Max Ehrlich, Kurt Gerron, Fritz Grünbaum)Racial policies excluding Jews from cultural lifeUnder the 1933 Reich Chamber of Culture laws, Jewish performers were barred from mainstream theaters and cabarets. They could only perform in segregated venues like the Jüdischer Kulturbund for Jewish audiences. Many, like Ehrlich (a prominent parodist), were forced to emigrate or work underground until the 1938 Kristallnacht pogrom prompted final expulsions. Gerron, a film director and actor, was banned from work and later deported to camps.
1933–1939Non-Jewish satirists (e.g., Werner Finck)Subtle anti-Nazi jokes in cabaretsFinck, a leading kabarett (satirical cabaret) artist, mocked Nazi posturing (e.g., burlesque salutes) in shows like Die Katakombe. He survived initial purges through self-censorship but was monitored by "cultural monitors." His career was repeatedly threatened, and he was briefly imprisoned in 1935 for "subversive" humor.
1939Werner Finck, Peter Sachse, Helmuth Buth, Wilhelm Meissner, Manfred Dlugi ("The Three Rulands")Political witticisms mocking Nazi leaders and policiesGoebbels expelled these five "Aryan" (non-Jewish) comedians from the Reich Chamber on February 3, 1939, for "lacking a positive attitude toward National Socialism" and making jokes about Hitler's building programs, the Four-Year Plan, and Nazi mannerisms. Goebbels justified it in the Nazi party newspaper, claiming the regime had no "time or patience" for such mockery now that it planned to rule for "2,000 years." Their careers in Germany ended immediately.

Broader Context​

  • Censorship Framework: From 1933, the Nazis abolished freedom of speech and press via decrees like the Editor's Law (October 1933), making it illegal to criticize the regime—even telling an anti-Hitler joke could lead to concentration camps. Satire was seen as "degenerate" and replaced with regime-approved propaganda films and radio broadcasts glorifying Hitler.
  • Impact on Jewish Comedians: Racial laws (e.g., Nuremberg Laws, 1935) expelled thousands of Jewish entertainers early on, far outnumbering cases of political satire. By 1938, over 12,000 Polish Jews (including performers) were deported in the "Polenaktion." Many fled to places like the Netherlands but were later captured.
  • Regime's Hypocrisy: Goebbels admitted in 1944 that satire had little place in Nazi culture, yet the regime tolerated (and produced) light-hearted propaganda like the Tran und Helle comedy shorts (1939–1940), which subtly promoted Nazi views without critique.
This suppression wasn't isolated to comedians— it extended to all media—but humor's subversive power made it a prime target. Despite the risks, some performers like Finck persisted with veiled satire until banned, showing resilience amid terror. For deeper reading, see the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum's resources on Nazi propaganda or Wikipedia's entry on censorship in Nazi Germany.Yes, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime did force comedians to be fired during the 1930s as part of broader censorship and persecution efforts. Starting in 1933, when the Nazis came to power, they implemented strict controls over the arts, media, and entertainment through the Reich Chamber of Culture, which required membership for professionals to work legally. This effectively allowed the regime to expel and ban performers who criticized the government, made political jokes, or were deemed "undesirable" (such as Jewish artists or political opponents).encyclopedia.ushmm.orguvic.ca

Many Jewish comedians and cabaret performers were targeted early on; they were often fired, forced to flee Germany, or sent to concentration camps due to anti-Semitic policies. For instance, prominent figures in Berlin's vibrant 1920s cabaret scene, which included satirical comedy, were purged if their work opposed Nazi ideology.festival.ilcinemaritrovato.it

A specific high-profile case occurred in 1939, when Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels expelled five prominent "Aryan" (non-Jewish) comedians—Werner Finck, Peter Sachse, and the trio known as "The Three Rulands" (Helmuth Buth, Wilhelm Meissner, and Manfred Dlugi)—from the Reich Chamber of Culture, ending their careers. Their offenses included making witticisms about Hitler's building programs, the Four-Year Plan, colonial issues, and even mimicking Nazi leaders' gestures—acts considered disloyal and harmful to the regime. By this point, criticizing the Nazis, even through humor, was illegal and could lead to imprisonment.boingboing.net

Overall, while some regime-approved comedy persisted (often propagandistic or non-political), satirical or anti-Nazi humor was heavily suppressed, with performers facing dismissal, arrest, or worse. This was part of the Nazis' total control over culture to eliminate dissent and promote their ideology
 
#372
#372
Sea Ray said:
I don't know where you got all that since you didn't source it but let's get it straight from Sinclair:



It sure sounds like Sinclair has no problem with Brendan Carr. In fact they want him to get more involved.


Sinclair Says Kimmel Suspension is Not Enough, Calls on FCC and ABC to Take Additional Action - Sinclair, Inc

Sinclair’s ABC stations to air a special in remembrance of Charlie Kirk during Jimmy Kimmel Live timeslot on Friday BALTIMORE – Sinclair, the nation’s largest ABC affiliate group, objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the assassination of Charlie Kirk. As discussed with ABC...
sbgi.net sbgi.net
Click to expand...

You and McDad are welcome to serve as official apologists for the Trump regime's authoritarian takedown of Jimmy Kimmel.

But the truth remains obvious as to what occurred here.
 
#374
#374
McDad said:
That's what I thought.

The truth is obvious. which illustrates how futile this effort is to help you see it.
Click to expand...

Heh. Well I'm sorry that you're unable to see that both these ABC affiliates knowingly and willfully ADMITTED that they made their decision to punish Kimmel AFTER threats by the FCC.
 
#375
#375
MontyPython said:
You and McDad are welcome to serve as official apologists for the Trump regime's authoritarian takedown of Jimmy Kimmel.

But the truth remains obvious as to what occurred here.
Click to expand...
I'm just sticking to facts and I posted wording straight from Sinclair's website. If you don't believe them and want to call them liars you're free to do so
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top