Orangeslice13
Shema Yisrael
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 98,947
- Likes
- 116,542
Wow. This is some kind of special delusion right here"The MAGA Gang (is) desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said. “In between the finger-pointing, there was grieving.”
The ABC late-night host’s remarks constituted “the sickest conduct possible,” FCC chair Brendan Carr told right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson on Wednesday. Carr suggested his FCC could move to revoke ABC affiliate licenses as a way to force Disney to punish Kimmel.
“We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr said. “These companies can find ways to change conduct and take actions on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”
And speaking on Fox Wednesday night, Carr suggested broadcasters would see more of this kind of pressure in the future.
“We at the FCC are going to force the public interest obligation. There are broadcasters out there that don’t like it, they can turn in their license in to the FCC,” Carr said. “But that’s our job. Again, we’re making some progress now.”
100%I don't like Carr's comments. Flexing the power of the FCC to stifle speech is BS.
But he's been flexing against The View for months and ABC has kept it on air. Given that fact, I think it's a fair assumption that Nexstar and Sinclair preempting Kimmel had much more to do with Disney's decision.
Found the reason
The Nexstar-Tegna merger is pending FCC approval, requiring the FCC to relax ownership rules that currently limit a single company from reaching more than 39% of U.S. households with its over-the-air signal. Nexstar is acquiring Tegna for $6.2 billion, and the deal is subject to both FCC and Department of Justice approval, as well as shareholder approval. The proposed merger would create the nation's largest local media company, but it hinges on the FCC's potential deregulation of broadcast ownership rules.
Key Aspects of the FCC Review
Ownership Cap Exceeded: The merger would result in Nexstar controlling stations reaching nearly 80% of U.S. households, significantly exceeding the current 39% limit.
Regulatory Approval Needed: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) must grant approval for the deal to go through.
Potential Rule Changes: The transaction relies on the FCC relaxing or changing existing TV station ownership rules to allow for such a large consolidation of local media.
Broader Regulatory Landscape: Approval also requires scrutiny from the Justice Department, and the deal is seen as testing the deregulatory approach under the Trump administration.
Current Status
Agreement in Place: Nexstar and Tegna entered into a definitive agreement for the $6.2 billion merger in August 2025.
Expected Close: The companies anticipate the deal will close by the second half of 2026, contingent on regulatory approvals.
Are you taking about something from the early 2000's. This merger with Nexstar is now. It needs the FCC to sign off. You aren't pretending that didn't play a roll here are you? Of course nextstar revolted when the head of FCC applied pressure
Yes Sinclair has nothing to worry about regarding the FCC. Can't believe you are even defending the FCC commenting on this nonesenseBOTH Nexstar AND Sinclair are NOW pulling Kimmel. If Nexstar is doing it to grease the skids for the Nexstar/Tegna merger, then why is Sinclair doing the exact same thing?
And all of them have been ignoring the spirit of the equal-time rule which the FCC administers.
Didn’t see anything on Sinclair. But ESPN has a deal pending for NFL Network.
Yes Sinclair has nothing to worry about regarding the FCC. Can't believe you are even defending the FCC commenting on this nonesense
Sinclair has had significant regulatory issues with the FCC, including a $48 million fine in 2020 and a $500,000 penalty in 2025 for sponsorship disclosure violations and other rule breaches related to its broadcast stations, while the FCC also fined ESPN a total of $1.4 million in 2015 and recently proposed a $147,000 penalty in 2024 for misusing Emergency Alert System (EAS) tones. The connection is that both companies are in the broadcasting industry and have faced significant penalties from the FCC for various violations of broadcast regulations.
I don't like Carr's comments. Flexing the power of the FCC to stifle speech is BS.
But he's been flexing against The View for months and ABC has kept it on air. Given that fact, I think it's a fair assumption that Nexstar and Sinclair preempting Kimmel had much more to do with Disney's decision.
And there you have it in black and white.Found the reason
The Nexstar-Tegna merger is pending FCC approval, requiring the FCC to relax ownership rules that currently limit a single company from reaching more than 39% of U.S. households with its over-the-air signal. Nexstar is acquiring Tegna for $6.2 billion, and the deal is subject to both FCC and Department of Justice approval, as well as shareholder approval. The proposed merger would create the nation's largest local media company, but it hinges on the FCC's potential deregulation of broadcast ownership rules.
Key Aspects of the FCC Review
Ownership Cap Exceeded: The merger would result in Nexstar controlling stations reaching nearly 80% of U.S. households, significantly exceeding the current 39% limit.
Regulatory Approval Needed: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) must grant approval for the deal to go through.
Potential Rule Changes: The transaction relies on the FCC relaxing or changing existing TV station ownership rules to allow for such a large consolidation of local media.
Broader Regulatory Landscape: Approval also requires scrutiny from the Justice Department, and the deal is seen as testing the deregulatory approach under the Trump administration.
Current Status
Agreement in Place: Nexstar and Tegna entered into a definitive agreement for the $6.2 billion merger in August 2025.
Expected Close: The companies anticipate the deal will close by the second half of 2026, contingent on regulatory approvals.