tn4elvis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 7,178
- Likes
- 13,895
Is agree with you about length bothering himI’m probably in the minority on this, but I’d redirect the $NIL paid to Carey to a 6’-10”+ post player. Carey has shown to be significantly less effective against length which most all the top teams have. Maybe Barnes can coach him to a better way to overcome his lack of height combined with lack of leaping ability, but as it stands I think we can do better.
I’m probably in the minority on this, but I’d redirect the $NIL paid to Carey to a 6’-10”+ post player. Carey has shown to be significantly less effective against length which most all the top teams have. Maybe Barnes can coach him to a better way to overcome his lack of height combined with lack of leaping ability, but as it stands I think we can do better.
Pretty sure that Boz stepped on the line before he tipped the ball…still got away with it, great assist, too!
Pretty sure he never officially crossed into the front court as you have to establish both feet and the ball to do so. Don’t think his second foot ever came down after establishing possession.I’ve never seen an angle showing it clearly. I also wondered if the behind the back pass to Nate was a backcourt violation. If Boswell stepped out of bounds it seems like there would have been a review. Considering they spend so much time reviewing non-critical minutia that would have been worthy of a closer look.
Pretty sure he never officially crossed into the front court as you have to establish both feet and the ball to do so. Don’t think his second foot ever came down after establishing possession.
The ball has to establish what is called "frontcourt status" to avoid the call. This is done by the ball touching the floor, a player in the frontcourt, or even an official standing on the floor in the frontcourt. So, if a player with the ball in the backcourt throws the ball across the timeline at 10.0 seconds, but it hasn't established frontcourt status by contacting the floor/player/official, it is a violation.Boswell? That makes sense. Weird rule though… one legged point guards would get called for 10 second violations on every possession.
And therefore, in a realistic scenario, if the ball is passed from the backcourt to a player standing on one foot at 10.1 seconds then it’d be a violation. Also, a violation if a player has the ball passed to them at 9.9 seconds and instead of catching the ball and establishing the possession they tip it to another player. Or maybe that’s all wrong and the player with the ball in the backcourt just has to get rid of it before 10.0 seconds. Like releasing shots before the buzzer.
The ball has to establish what is called "frontcourt status" to avoid the call. This is done by the ball touching the floor, a player in the frontcourt, or even an official standing on the floor in the frontcourt. So, if a player with the ball in the backcourt throws the ball across the timeline at 10.0 seconds, but it hasn't established frontcourt status by contacting the floor/player/official, it is a violation.
The 5-second inbound violation does simply involve releasing the ball within 5 seconds.I feel like there have been rule changes that I’ve missed. I thought that the 10-second rule and the two 5 second violations were just that the ball needed to be out of the passers possession to avoid the violation.
I completely missed when in-bounders no longer had to maintain a pivot foot and now have a cylinder within a step or so to stay inside of. I remember when double dribbles were frequently whistled and traveling and 3-second violations were enforced. And drawing a charge was called at closer to 50% of the time that there were collisions in the paint.
The 5-second inbound violation does simply involve releasing the ball within 5 seconds.
The 10-second backcourt violation requires establishing the ball in the frontcourt, however. Whether that is dribbling the ball to have it touch the floor, passing it to touch the floor, contact with a teammate/opponent/official in the frontcourt.
Hope so. He needs to find a niche where e can generate some high $$$ income. This year, his salary is helpful as the analyst on UT radio. That is likely no more than a 2 year deal. He will be replaced in the next couple of years with someone far better. Hopefully he finds a niche to pay him well. It certainly isn't in the radio industryHas Chris Lofton made any babies yet?
