I know people who read the article are going to stumble over two items in the article if they juxtapose them. So I'm posting this to get out ahead of that.
------
"Carter was able to help the program buy new home uniforms, which are complete with a small image of a ghost (his trademark emblem) and his No. 23 on the left shoulder of the jerseys."
[...] "'I know firsthand that a lot of inner city schools struggle with funding for equipment and jerseys, and I just thank God for allowing me to be in this position to help. My inspiration is basically tattooed on my arm: 'Forever Humble.' "
------
I'm guessing most whites would consider such self-promotion to be the opposite of humility. But a widely accepted trait of modern American "black church culture"--possibly originating out of generations who worked and educated their way to success during (and despite) the Jim Crow era--is that "showing out," dressing in ways that draw attention to yourself, and self-promotion are regarded as signs of a positive self-image, and something to be admired and valued within the community. Given their historical context, it's logical.
(From a psychological standpoint, I personally fear it's an adaptation that--despite its injection of much needed positive energy--is inadequate and also generates its own slow poison.)
As for different church cultures (from the perspective of one seminary trained who leans politically populist-conservative) white churches also have a long history of promoting some "traditional values" that come out of their social norms and their U.S. history, but on examination seem to be at odds with the Bible.
So, despite our cultural differences, we can always find unity in our shared human failings. But I guess that demands yet another kind of humility.