n_huffhines
I want for you what you want for immigrants
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 91,718
- Likes
- 55,867
I'm not saying liking the movie is pandering. I'm saying 97% of all published critics liking it is pandering. There is no way on God's green earth they were all holding this decent/good movie to the same standards as other movies in its same genera.
I said the people calling people racist for not raving about it are on the fringe. People overrating the movie is a completely different question.
My question is why are y'all so obsessed?
I'm not saying liking the movie is pandering. I'm saying 97% of all published critics liking it is pandering.
You agreed ITOT that its overall production quality is as good as anything else not named Dark Knight....now it's just "decent/good"?
There's more to a good movie than production quality. Maybe what we're thinking as "production quality" isn't the same thing? Cinematography, lighting, sound, set design all top notch. Acting, very good mostly. Writing, not so great. The plot was subpar. The pace was excruciating to me. Not as much action as a movie of its genera ought to have.
I said the people calling people racist for not raving about it are on the fringe. People overrating the movie is a completely different question.
My question is why are y'all so obsessed?
I think its because people are tired of being labeled of something that they are not. You cant disagree with people anymore without being labeled as a racist or homophobe, or xenopobe or anything else. Cant you just say I dont like this movie,book, tv show, play and not be placed in a category?
You gave it a 7-7.5. That means your review was positive, just like the 97%. Are you pandering?
Jfc dude. You're being willfully obtuse. There are better movies that have done worse with critics. Those critics who would vote unfavorably for a better movie, but give this one glowing reviews are the ones pandering. Mathematically, there has to be a pretty good sample of such pandering reviewers.
If 97% of people think Black Panther is a 7, and 92% think Shawshank is a 9 and a few didn't like it, I wouldn't necessarily say that Black Panther did "better" with critics. It could simply be less polarizing and have a broader base of appeal. The IMDB rating, based on the actual rating of the movie rather than the percentage of people who like it, BP is a 7.9.
It absolutely is. It could appeal to a higher percentage of critics, while a better movie could appeal to a slightly smaller percentage but much more strongly. They're two different metrics.
So your stance is that a comic book movie about a guy in tights who has super strength and razor sharp claws is more appealing overall to movie critics than shawshank. Critics who are known for wearing scarves and artsy horn rimmed glasses while basking in the wondrous aroma of their own farts. I'm certainly skeptical of that claim.