kptvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2005
- Messages
- 27,294
- Likes
- 1
Aggrandizing the accomplishments of a guy that handed off to two first round draft picks is much better. The talent difference between 2006 Arkansas and 2008 Arkansas is greater than the difference between those two TEs.
Mustain would have started at Arkansas had he been there last year. It's really that simple.
I specifically said last season was better than anything Mustain would ever do, not anything Mustain might possibly do in a different dimension where he didn't make several idiotic decisions.
Last season Dick directed an offense that led Arkansas to an amazing 3-9 record, even with one of the best backs in the SEC to hand off to. Mustain 8-0. I'm still confused on how 3 > 8
8>3. Simple. Mustain has accomplished more in his limited career than Dick did last year. How you are debating this I don't know.
2500 yards > 800 yards. 47 TDs > 12 TDs.
Mustain rode the coattails of an extremely talented team. He did nothing.
And I didn't realize Michael Smith was the equivalent of Felix Jones and Darren McFadden.
Now that I think about it, Mustain is at a 100% success rate. He must be the greatest QB that ever lived.
I agree. Casey Dick was much more responsible for actually running the offense where Mitch Mustain had two beasts in the backfield. Obviously Arky won more with Mustain at quarterback, but it was certainly not because of him. I don't think Mustain would be playing if he was still at Arky.
I agree. Casey Dick was much more responsible for actually running the offense where Mitch Mustain had two beasts in the backfield. Obviously Arky won more with Mustain at quarterback, but it was certainly not because of him. I don't think Mustain would be playing if he was still at Arky.
You keep waffling between which one is better and which one accomplished more. You may think Dick is better, but Mustain has obviously accomplished more. Completion yards aren't accomplishments. Wins are.
