Bizzaro Bowl Predictions from ESPN

#1

lawgator1

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
74,537
Likes
44,040
#1
Remember the "Bizzaro Jerry" episode of Seinfeld? Well here are the bizzaro bowl predicitons from ESPN as of today.

Maisel has Auburn in the national championship game against OSU and Tennessee playing Notre Dame in the Sugar. He has Florida playing Wisconsin in the Capital One Bowl.


Schlabach has Auburn in your stead at the championship game, Florida playing Michigan in the Rose, and you taking Florida's spot in the Capital One Bowl.

All I can say is .... huh?


ESPN.com - NCF - 2006 Bowl projections
 
#2
#2
to each his own....they get paid to stir the pot....and mama needs a new pair of shoes.
 
#3
#3
I think you can pretty much fill in the blank with anything:
Bizarro ________________ from ESPN.
 
#4
#4
Its a given that at least one team from the SEC will get the shaft from ESPN in their bowl analysis.
 
#6
#6
Its a given that at least one team from the SEC will get the shaft from ESPN in their bowl analysis.

Well, what surprises me is the notion that an 11-2, Florida (assuming a loss in the title game), or an 11-1 Tennessee (wouldn't you by then be in the top five in BCS standings?), would be in the Capital One Bowl.

Only explanation I can think of is that theyare basing in on their own projection of final "SEC rank," leaving out the possibility that you could for example be #3 in the SEC with an 11-1 record. Or, in Florida's case, that it could be 11-1 and lose the SECCG and then probably still be a potential BCS team, depending on what else happens.

For my thinking, obviously either OSU or Michigan is probably in the title game after their match-up on 11/18. USC has been living on the edge, a la Florida, and are due to lose once, maybe twice and they will plummet. W Va. and Louisville, well, one will survive their match-up and it is sadly a real possibility that whoever does may get to the national title game (but either or both could lose somewhere along the way).

The winner of the SEC title game still has a decent shot if they otherwise run the table.
 
#7
#7
i think the BCS is total CRAP......I will not watch the national championship if WVU or Louisville for that matter get in, THEIR SCHEDULES ARE BULL......What year was it that TCU went undefeated, they had a tougher schedule. and i just moved to big ten country(but i am moving back south in less then a month) but im so sick of them whining about how they play a tough conf. schedule, Im in northwest ohio (big times MIGHIGAN/OSU battle) but i think to myself WHO DO YOU PLAY! but then they answer i would rather have an SEC schedule then big ten.......AND I ALMOST PASS OUT FROM LAUGHING SO HARD(plus all the beer dont help either) god i could go on all day about college football, but GO VOLS!
 
#8
#8
Well, what surprises me is the notion that an 11-2, Florida (assuming a loss in the title game), or an 11-1 Tennessee (wouldn't you by then be in the top five in BCS standings?), would be in the Capital One Bowl.

Only explanation I can think of is that theyare basing in on their own projection of final "SEC rank," leaving out the possibility that you could for example be #3 in the SEC with an 11-1 record. Or, in Florida's case, that it could be 11-1 and lose the SECCG and then probably still be a potential BCS team, depending on what else happens.

For my thinking, obviously either OSU or Michigan is probably in the title game after their match-up on 11/18. USC has been living on the edge, a la Florida, and are due to lose once, maybe twice and they will plummet. W Va. and Louisville, well, one will survive their match-up and it is sadly a real possibility that whoever does may get to the national title game (but either or both could lose somewhere along the way).

The winner of the SEC title game still has a decent shot if they otherwise run the table.
i posted in another thread earlier some scenarios that could result in what you are talking about. the SEC champ will likely need some help to get in to the NT game, no matter what. and the biggest form of help could come from USC losing. to anyone. and Cal losing again. Insurance would come from WVU or L'ville losing an additional game besides their head to head. TX is the biggest concern, cause i don't see them losing another game.

But from a strength of schedule standpoint...there are legitimately 4 teams in the SEC with shots at the NT game...and here's how i think it benefits for each:
Florida...win out and play a 1 loss Auburn team likely in the top 5. But even if it were Ark, say they were only a 1 loss top ten, that wouldn't hurt them either. FL still has the best chance of getting in to the NT game imo.
Auburn...win out, and play a one loss top 5 or 10 TN. they've already beaten FL, so how much credit do you get for beating a team twice, thus decreasing your schedule strength? Though the rankings have them at 4 right now, they don't control their own destiny. ARK owns the tie breaker, and as Auburn keeps winning, it helps their sos....
ARK...win out and play a one loss FL team...that would give them wins against all the big boys...FL, TN, Aub and LSU....wow wouldn't that be something? Playing TN again wouldn't help them as much...same thing for Auburn playing FL again...how much credit do you get for beating a team twice?
TN...win out and play a one loss Auburn team. this is the biggest long shot of them all in my opinion. Mainly because we could still win out and not play in the SEC Title game, which would help UF's sos in scenario 1.

what will happen: Auburn and FL play each other again, and FL goes to the sugar bowl.
 
#9
#9
what will happen: Auburn and FL play each other again, and FL goes to the sugar bowl.


I can live with that as a Gator fan, naturally. But in terms of the SEC and basic fairness, it is starting to look like the SECCG could either help a team make it in to the NT game (in the event there is only one undefeated team at seasons's end) or it could kill the loser of the SECCG if it went into the game with one loss.

What if, for example, you are right and add into your schenario that Auburn has not lost again. So Auburn, at 11-1, faces Florida (or less likely UT) and loses.

Even more likely, it may well be that the SECCG can't help either of the participants at all. If there are two undefeateds, the NT game would likely not be affect by outcome of SECCG, but the teams going into the SECCG could easily have nothing to gain and everything to lose by playing in it.
 
#10
#10
I can live with that as a Gator fan, naturally. But in terms of the SEC and basic fairness, it is starting to look like the SECCG could either help a team make it in to the NT game (in the event there is only one undefeated team at seasons's end) or it could kill the loser of the SECCG if it went into the game with one loss.

What if, for example, you are right and add into your schenario that Auburn has not lost again. So Auburn, at 11-1, faces Florida (or less likely UT) and loses.

Even more likely, it may well be that the SECCG can't help either of the participants at all. If there are two undefeateds, the NT game would likely not be affect by outcome of SECCG, but the teams going into the SECCG could easily have nothing to gain and everything to lose by playing in it.
i think you're right...and i think that will likely happen, and the same would apply if Fl goes in with one loss and loses to either Auburn or Ark...same rationale applies.

Auburn and FL shouls win out, ARK will hopefully lose to TN and i think LSU will beat them.

two 11-1, top 5 teams playing for the SEC title, and the winner still needs help to play for the NT. that just sounds wrong?

the championship game for the SEC is only a beneift if there are multiple 1 loss teams or one undefeated team, as you said, and the winner of the SEC is also a one loss team....

other than that, you have to go undefeated. and in the current landscape, the big 10, big 12 and Pac 10 are at an advantage either because they have no Conf. CG or the conf. is fairly weak, ah, hem...big 12.

which is why at the end of the day, i've quit worrying about BCS title games. Win the SEC....that's the only realistic goal any of us can have these days...and besides, we all know what it means to win the SEC, even if the system doesn't.
 
#11
#11
What if you have OSU undefeated and the following teams with 1 loss:

Texas, Michigan, USC, Auburn, UF, Tennessee, and Cal.

plus an undefeated WVU from the Big East?

Will the BCS formula put WVU above all those 1 loss teams?

Could be trouble...
 
#12
#12
i think you're right...and i think that will likely happen, and the same would apply if Fl goes in with one loss and loses to either Auburn or Ark...same rationale applies.

Auburn and FL shouls win out, ARK will hopefully lose to TN and i think LSU will beat them.

two 11-1, top 5 teams playing for the SEC title, and the winner still needs help to play for the NT. that just sounds wrong?

the championship game for the SEC is only a beneift if there are multiple 1 loss teams or one undefeated team, as you said, and the winner of the SEC is also a one loss team....

other than that, you have to go undefeated. and in the current landscape, the big 10, big 12 and Pac 10 are at an advantage either because they have no Conf. CG or the conf. is fairly weak, ah, hem...big 12.

which is why at the end of the day, i've quit worrying about BCS title games. Win the SEC....that's the only realistic goal any of us can have these days...and besides, we all know what it means to win the SEC, even if the system doesn't.


Not only that, but the loser (probably still one of the best 6 or 8 teams in the country) conceivably drops all the way to the Capital One Bowl. Astounding.
 
#14
#14
Not only that, but the loser (probably still one of the best 6 or 8 teams in the country) conceivably drops all the way to the Capital One Bowl. Astounding.
the loser of the SEC title game has not ever gone to a BCS bowl...(i'm almost positive of that anyway...) and it won't start now. If Auburn and FL play and both have 1 loss...the winner will not play for a nt and loser will be in Orlando. that i have no problem in predicting.

And right about then, Mike Slive should stand up somewhere and start screaming about seceding from the NCAA, and we'll just crown our own champion.:birgits_giggle:
 
#15
#15
the loser of the SEC title game has not ever gone to a BCS bowl...(i'm almost positive of that anyway...) and it won't start now. If Auburn and FL play and both have 1 loss...the winner will not play for a nt and loser will be in Orlando. that i have no problem in predicting.

And right about then, Mike Slive should stand up somewhere and start screaming about seceding from the NCAA, and we'll just crown our own champion.:birgits_giggle:
Would that make Mike Slive the Jefferson Davis of College Football ?
 
Advertisement



Back
Top