NighthawkVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 14,528
- Likes
- 51,520
The tweet is garbage because of the way it is framed. Connelly isn’t ranking them based on who he believes is the best coach. Here’s the explanation:That list got to be just to get fanbase clicks and people talking
Kelly has a 10x greater argument for being top 10 than Heupel does for being no top 2. Outside of Tennessee fans, Heupel’s ranking is the one that would cause anyone else to say the list is BSWeird as hell list imo even though I think Heupel is top five probably.
No way in hell Day is first. No way in hell Kelly is top ten imo. Smart should be default be first at this point. Sark probably wins a title in the next couple of years. Mullen wtf??? Franklin is mediocre imho.
Agree with all that.Weird as hell list imo even though I think Heupel is top five probably.
No way in hell Day is first. No way in hell Kelly is top ten imo. Smart should be default be first at this point. Sark probably wins a title in the next couple of years. Mullen wtf??? Franklin is mediocre imho.
Schiano would’ve been a terrible fit here and was awful in the NFL, but he’s good at a place like Rutgers. That place has been completely worthless except when he is there, and they have undoubtedly improved a lot since he returned there.I was excited for CJH until I saw Schiano on the list. That pretty much cancels out the legitimacy of the entire list.
Schiano and Heupel are basically night and day as far as human beings as well.Schiano would’ve been a terrible fit here and was awful in the NFL, but he’s good at a place like Rutgers. That place has been completely worthless except when he is there, and they have undoubtedly improved a lot since he returned there.