Big 10+1 Commisioner

Let me just say this. If Peyton was the God some people seem to think he is, then he would have won more than one region. (the south) It wasn't just a bunch of northerner that thought Woodson was deserving. No one here has actually tried to convince me that he was. No one year would actually give respect to a Michigan player. Basically from what I know that year. Manning was a stat machine. And if the award was supposed to go to a stat machine, then fine. But it was supposed to go to Most Outsanding Player, and Woodson was in my eyes, and the eyes of many, the most outstanding player. Some of you may be bias towards Manning, I don't know. But obviously, since I was young, I wasn't worshiping the ground Manning walked on. I view that year with very little bias, and I just don't see how anyone was more deserving than Woodson.

The process did seem extremely biased. "Highlights" of the two seemed to focus on Woodson making INTs and Manning throwing them. Even at the awards banquet, I think they mentioned some shortcomings of Peyton.
 
Let me just say this. If Peyton was the God some people seem to think he is, then he would have won more than one region. (the south) It wasn't just a bunch of northerner that thought Woodson was deserving. No one here has actually tried to convince me that he was. No one year would actually give respect to a Michigan player. Basically from what I know that year. Manning was a stat machine. And if the award was supposed to go to a stat machine, then fine. But it was supposed to go to Most Outsanding Player, and Woodson was in my eyes, and the eyes of many, the most outstanding player. Some of you may be bias towards Manning, I don't know. But obviously, since I was young, I wasn't worshiping the ground Manning walked on. I view that year with very little bias, and I just don't see how anyone was more deserving than Woodson.

If we use this logic, all Reggie Bush was, was a stat machine...
 
Let me just say this. If Peyton was the God some people seem to think he is, then he would have won more than one region. (the south) It wasn't just a bunch of northerner that thought Woodson was deserving. No one here has actually tried to convince me that he was. No one year would actually give respect to a Michigan player. Basically from what I know that year. Manning was a stat machine. And if the award was supposed to go to a stat machine, then fine. But it was supposed to go to Most Outsanding Player, and Woodson was in my eyes, and the eyes of many, the most outstanding player. Some of you may be bias towards Manning, I don't know. But obviously, since I was young, I wasn't worshiping the ground Manning walked on. I view that year with very little bias, and I just don't see how anyone was more deserving than Woodson.

So you think the measure of outstanding is a subjective thing?
 
Fine, just because it does go to stat machines sometimes (and 2000 yards is certainly no small task), doesn't mean it should always go to someone else. Who would you have given it to in 1998 anyways.

It's a ridiculous argument. Ricky Williams was insane. He kept Priest Holmes on the bench. Nobody deserved it more that year.
 
Reggie Bush was amazing. I'm not even sure he had the best stats, but I didn't expect anything other than a lanslide after his performances.

He had tremendous stats. Some of the best yardage ever. I still think Vince Young should have gotten more consideration. He was good enough to at least make it competitive.
 
Fine, just because it does go to stat machines sometimes (and 2000 yards is certainly no small task), doesn't mean it should always go to someone else. Who would you have given it to in 1998 anyways.

Never mind, you answered my previous question.
 
He had tremendous stats. Some of the best yardage ever. I still think Vince Young should have gotten more consideration. He was good enough to at least make it competitive.

If the award was handed out after bowls, it was Young in a lanslide.
 
He had tremendous stats. Some of the best yardage ever. I still think Vince Young should have gotten more consideration. He was good enough to at least make it competitive.

I know Fresno State isn't a powerhouse, but how many yards did he have that game?

I also remember he rushed for 175 yards in the first quarter against UCLA.
 
Don't confuse negativity with realism.
Realistically, how many QB's have you ever seen make a 180 the way Ainge did? It just doesn't happen often. Prior history would have suggested Ainge would had Steve Sax Syndrome...

I watched him his freshman year and he did good. I realized that Sanders was a terrible coach and that Cutcliffe had worked wonders with QBs before. After the Cal game, I was never concerned again about Ainge
 
If the award was handed out after bowls, it was Young in a lanslide.

He was impressive in the regular season, as well. At least good enough to where I don't think Reggie should have won in the third largest landslide ever.
 
Fine, just because it does go to stat machines sometimes (and 2000 yards is certainly no small task), doesn't mean it should always go to someone else. Who would you have given it to in 1998 anyways.

Well, since the template had already been set with Woodson, why not Champ Bailey? :ermm:
 
He was impressive in the regular season, as well. At least good enough to where I don't think Reggie should have won in the third largest landslide ever.

It may not have been that people thought he was that much better, but a ton of people thought he was a little better.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top