hohenfelsvol
How uwe doo-in?!?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 50,389
- Likes
- 2,739
I still think he can get the job done in time. However, he made a terrible coaching hire and he has to own up to it. IMO we have improved on special teams and offense but we have regressed on defense without question. The one hire that so many were happy about is the same one that is going to cause his dismissal.
I hate it for Dooley but his deciding to hire Sal and swap to the 3-4 is the reason were in the shape were in. If our defense could have just been mediocre, we would probably have at least two more games in the win column. Dooley should have hired a compitent DC no matter what conference they came from. It would have changed the entire outcome of all this mess. In the end Dools has to take responsibility for making the poor desicion of hiring Sal and swapping schemes when so much was on the line.
Sal is Dooley's Clawson.
Improved on special teams??? Some of our fans our worse than Dools.
Last night converted a lot of people. It is a 90-10 fanbase split in favor of firing Dooley at this point.
I have watched enough of this team, to realize that we resemble Vanderbilt, more than we resemble Tennessee. Always close, but never cashing the check. This team reminds me when Vandy had Cutler and Bennett, but then again they had a much better defense then, than we do now.
It's not about when's enough, is enough, for me, it's more like, do our big-time donors actually truly give a damn about winning football games at UT anymore?? ...
I hate it for Dooley but his deciding to hire Sal and swap to the 3-4 is the reason were in the shape were in. If our defense could have just been mediocre, we would probably have at least two more games in the win column. Dooley should have hired a compitent DC no matter what conference they came from. It would have changed the entire outcome of all this mess. In the end Dools has to take responsibility for making the poor desicion of hiring Sal and swapping schemes when so much was on the line.
Just for the sake of argument here.. If I were to argue the opposite of this I would say it was a calculated risk. Knowing that there are going to be a lot of mistakes made on defense you are going to have to score a lot of points to be in ballgames. Knowing the offense was our strength this year, maybe that's why the did what they did with the scheme change etc.. But then again, who knows what's really going on over there..
I wanted Dooley to make it, but I just don't know anymore.. Honestly though, it feels like we have been saying since 2001 the same things about poor tackling, mental errors, and all the other things you should have learned way before getting to college ball.
Yes there have been mistakes but if im not mistaken our return yards are way up and our return defense hasnt given up a lot of yards either. Weve had one dropped punt so far this year as opposed to one per game last year. No doubt our kickers are still somewhat struggling but all you can do is recruit the # 1 kicker in the nation and hope he pans out, so far he really hasnt. So yes , I still feel better about our ST compared to the last few years. If you focus only on the bad things I can see why you might not think so.
Here's the kicking game just last nite:
- A 14 yard punt
- 6 men on line of scrimmage negates 49 yard punt
- A time out for FG defense
- A kick off out of bounds
- A running into the kicker penalty
- A fumbled punt
- A botched pooch kick
Aside from CP the kicking game is a total embarrassment. And this is David Shula's- I mean Derek Dooley's area of expertise, right?
Because you have money too. Not as much as the top boosters but I'm sure if you gave thousands it wouldn't hurt.