I have plenty of issues. I know my faults. I know my strengths. I know what I can/cannot do. What I know and don't know. I have no issue calling people out over their stupidity. Just being old doesn't make one rich. You have to play it right along the way. Huff saying being old is the only reason for wealth and then changing his tune to include early investments and growth after being called out on his original bit is ridiculous. I merely pointed out that just being old doesn't make one wealthy. He got embarrassed and escalated. Fuzzy, warm feelings of compliments only get you so far.
You also may want to check your posting history on insults, glass houses and all.
You have been my b!tch for the past two days. Over and over you've shown your inability to read. You need to only look in this thread. I'll help...
Originally Posted by SergeantVol View Post
Taxing the wealthy should be the issue, not high income earners. Most high income earners have worked their way to where they are. Taxing them at a high rate creates no incentive for people to excel. The wealthy on the other hand, have assets that are accumulated over time.
Me - The fundamental flaw in this argument is that high earners would be satisfied being poor. They won't. They will continue to earn.
You -
You're unbelievable, LG Downer.
Are you really saying high earners should be taxed ridiculous amounts because they'll just keep working harder to keep getting taxed ridiculous amounts? High earners should just be taken advantage of? We should just punish high earners?
My next post - No, I didn't advocate a position. I simply noted the flaw in the argument. I am for a flat tax. One bracket. Tax begins being assessed at X dollars of income. No deductions. No credits.
At this point I responded directly to your post - You have got to start reading. You continue to add unsupported assumptions instead of simply reading carefully. It makes you look stupid.
Then you asked to clarify what I typed. It is a stupid request. How can I clarify an unambiguous statement? What you were asking me to do was to address the assumptions you made about my statement.
There is no need for me to defend positions that exist only in your mind.
Then you decided to start gloating about it...
Just as I had suspected, my original response sufficed leaving you with no way to defend your point.
Huh? You said nothing to challenge my point...
Then I showed you my position on taxes and you ignored.
Then you got mouthy in another thread...
Originally Posted by ClearwaterVol View Post
I notice you had no response on my tax stance. You're out of your depth, Donnie
Tums - What tax stance? The one where you had nothing to say? I already shut you down after you refused to clarify the comment you couldn't clarify. Now, go enable some worthless people and punish those who are successful. You've been having a rough few days. Dragging some hard working people down should cheer you right up.
Face it, you've been running your trap without reading. You may apologize now.