Daloth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2011
- Messages
- 6,727
- Likes
- 1,403
I normally lurk, but this was a great read. Good job OP. I personally think Barnett has a better pro career. He can be effective in multiple schemes.
This is how I view him too, and from what I've seen of similar college/pro players at the positions. Garret is a more consistent Clowney (without the insane single year Clowney had) and I expect him to be the same in the NFL, very feast or famine type player. His potential is higher than Barnett's, but he needs the right team and system and to not get injured for it to happen.
Barnett is more akin to Reggie White or Dwight Freeney. Able to play in multiple positions and athletic enough to do them all pretty well. Though neither Garret nor Barnett have the sheer size + speed that either of those guys had, both are quicker than the two, but Barnett more so laterally from what I've seen.
We forget, Barnett and Garret are virtually the same weight, but Garret is two inches taller. If Barnett was even an inch taller, then the two wouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence most likely. But pro scouts in all sports love potential and "prototypical measurables" over sure fire things more often these days, mostly because they HAVE to find that next freak player.