Bama's very beatable

#4
#4
grizzliesrule888 said:
Most of the players that were hurt in the A&M game will be back and DKJ coming back will help a ton. The Bama O and D lines are overrated and their receivers aren't as good as those from A&M.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDcKRjjK3OQ
Click to expand...

Bama's O-line is inconsistent, I'll grant you that. But Bama's D-line (and front 7 in general) are fantastic. And we could debate the quality of Bama's receivers compared to A&M's, but it's a dumb debate since both groups are very good.
 
#7
#7
grizzliesrule888 said:
Most of the players that were hurt in the A&M game will be back and DKJ coming back will help a ton. The Bama O and D lines are overrated and their receivers aren't as good as those from A&M.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDcKRjjK3OQ
Click to expand...

Did you see what Dieter did to us last time around?
7 for 133 and 1 TD. And toss in Calvin Ridley and OJ Howard. The player to watch out for is ArDarius Stewart IMO. They are loaded everywhere op. We can still win the game. GBO
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#8
#8
"Very beatable"?? No.

We're gonna have to play a near flawless, sound, fundamental game, AND get some breaks to pull this upset.

No offense, but there's a lot wrong with your reasoning here. Ridley, Stewart, Howard and even Dieter are as good a receiving corps as there is in the country.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#9
#9
KBVol said:
"Very beatable"?? No.

We're gonna have to play a near flawless, sound, fundamental game, AND get some breaks to pull this upset.

No offense, but there's a lot wrong with your reasoning here. Ridley, Stewart, Howard and even Dieter are as good a receiving corps as there is in the country.
Click to expand...

I'm not disagreeing with you but the qb can't get them the ball if Barnett and company have him on his back. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#11
#11
We are just as good as Alabama. We just have to play 4 quarters.

Is their D as good as Florida's? Nope and look what we did to them.

Is their offense as explosive as AM's? Nope. Our defense locked them up when not playing on a short field.

We play a full game and we win. The days of needing to be perfect and catch breaks are over. This team is stupid good. We just need to play like it for once.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#12
#12
That was a team with a freshman QB playing in his first road game against a top 20 team that had their number two years in a row.

Then they won that game byw.

So I guess they are no good.
 
#15
#15
The Orange Pants said:
We are just as good as Alabama. We just have to play 4 quarters.

Is their D as good as Florida's? Nope and look what we did to them.

Is their offense as explosive as AM's? Nope. Our defense locked them up when not playing on a short field.

We play a full game and we win. The days of needing to be perfect and catch breaks are over. This team is stupid good. We just need to play like it for once.
Click to expand...

Wow denial in full force or delusional
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#16
#16
KBVol said:
"Very beatable"?? No.

We're gonna have to play a near flawless, sound, fundamental game, AND get some breaks to pull this upset.

No offense, but there's a lot wrong with your reasoning here. Ridley, Stewart, Howard and even Dieter are as good a receiving corps as there is in the country.
Click to expand...

Tennessee will put them to the test.
 
#17
#17
I'm not sure what "very beatable" is supposed to mean but I don't think it works well. They're averaging nearly 45ppg and 490ypg on offense while giving up less than 16ppg and 300ypg.

If it's just a matter of "they can be beat" then absolutely, they can, but "very beatable" seems a bit blase when referencing a team that hasn't finished outside the AP top 10 since '08 and finished #1 4 times in that span.*

*Of course, that very observation would make a victory all the more satisfying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#20
#20
ArmyVol697 said:
That was a team with a freshman QB playing in his first road game against a top 20 team that had their number two years in a row.

Then they won that game byw.

So I guess they are no good.
Click to expand...

I don't think they're no good. Neyland is a lot bigger than Vaught-Hemingway fwiw. They're just very beatable.
 
#22
#22
hndog609 said:
I'm not sure what "very beatable" is supposed to mean but I don't think it works well. They're averaging nearly 45ppg and 490ypg on offense while giving up less than 16ppg and 300ypg.

If it's just a matter of "they can be beat" then absolutely, they can, but "very beatable" seems a bit blase when referencing a team that hasn't finished outside the AP top 10 since '08 and finished #1 4 times in that span.*

*Of course, that very observation would make a victory all the more satisfying.
Click to expand...

We've played harder teams
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top