TxVolFan4Life
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2014
- Messages
- 41
- Likes
- 26
Here's the thing. It's been discussed a lot on this board (and this is an issue that applies to both of us right now) and that is how good do you really have to be to win the SEC East? How good really?
I maintain that some of the non-championship Spurrier Gator teams would be able to sleep walk to Atlanta in the current SEC East. Teams that, at the time, I just thought were OK. They'd laugh at the current East.
So, how good do you have to be? Missouri went 10-2 in 2014. How good were they, really?
I don't think, in 2015, you have to be "good" to beat Kentucky, Florida, Vanderbilt....South Carolina at home. If you catch Georgia on the right day (like Florida did last year) not sure how good you have to be to beat them.
So, if Tennessee is actually "good" in the way we would classically define it (and I can't describe it, I just know it when I see it), Tennessee should win an awful lot of games.
There are still question marks, but Tennessee has no more question marks than anyone else in the East, except maybe Georgia.
Sooner or later, you have to win.
and i think more than anything, this is more an indictment on GA than anything else. by all rights, they've had the ability to take the East and dominate it the past 3-4 years and failed to do so for one reason or the other, but it's always something.Here's the thing. It's been discussed a lot on this board (and this is an issue that applies to both of us right now) and that is how good do you really have to be to win the SEC East? How good really?
I maintain that some of the non-championship Spurrier Gator teams would be able to sleep walk to Atlanta in the current SEC East. Teams that, at the time, I just thought were OK. They'd laugh at the current East.
So, how good do you have to be? Missouri went 10-2 in 2014. How good were they, really?
I don't think, in 2015, you have to be "good" to beat Kentucky, Florida, Vanderbilt....South Carolina at home. If you catch Georgia on the right day (like Florida did last year) not sure how good you have to be to beat them.
So, if Tennessee is actually "good" in the way we would classically define it (and I can't describe it, I just know it when I see it), Tennessee should win an awful lot of games.
There are still question marks, but Tennessee has no more question marks than anyone else in the East, except maybe Georgia.
Sooner or later, you have to win.
Anyone going to mention Tee Martin? Not high expectations the year we won the NC and we did get a lucky break Vs Arkansas.
Edit: Didn't he set some kind of passing record in a game but was known as a runner?
i didn't get a negative vibe at all from that article. and nothing in the article was false, as far as what our ?'s are headed in to 2015.Some of us are pathetic! Why do we jump on the side of any article that has some negative bs about our players. Let the season start before we start validating these backhanded articles about our team. Everyone is trying to infuse doubt to slow down this big orange train. Don't buy it! Go Vols!!
Some of us are pathetic! Why do we jump on the side of any article that has some negative bs about our players. Let the season start before we start validating these backhanded articles about our team. Everyone is trying to infuse doubt to slow down this big orange train. Don't buy it! Go Vols!!
8-4 is this year's 6-6. Would there be some crazy vol fans on the fringe who think it's a terrible season? Yeah. Would they be idiots? Yep.
IMO the article is pretty spot on about Dobbs. He's never gonna be an elite passer. He doesn't have an NFL arm. He's shown both questionable accuracy and decision making at times as a passer.
But that doesn't mean he can't be an effective QB, especially in our system. IMO Dobbs's accuracy issues won't be too much of an issue for us as long as he can improve his decision making and cut down on turnovers.
If the OL takes a step forward and our running game is able to improve enough, I doubt we'll be worrying too much about Dobbs's accuracy anyway.