volfannbama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 16,406
- Likes
- 20,215
What's wrong with the S&C program? Short summary of what should bed different based on each case. Defense only.
Jalen Reeves-Maybin:
Cameron Sutton:
Darrin Kirkland:
Shy Tuttle:
Khalil McKenzie
Todd Kelly:
Evan Berry:
Micah Abernathy:
Daniel Bituli:
Danny O'Brien:
I've been hoping someone can explain how the SC program could have fixed each case this season. TIA.
Exactly and as you said thats only on Defense. At some point Every member of our defensive 2 deep has been on the shelf excepting Barnett, Vereen and Jumper.What's wrong with the S&C program? Short summary of what should bed different based on each case. Defense only.
Jalen Reeves-Maybin:
Cameron Sutton:
Darrin Kirkland:
Shy Tuttle:
Khalil McKenzie
Todd Kelly:
Evan Berry:
Micah Abernathy:
Daniel Bituli:
Danny O'Brien:
I've been hoping someone can explain how the SC program could have fixed each case this season. TIA.
just because you have a lot of injuries does not mean its on S&C most of the mouth breathing parrots just heard it said so they repeat it without understanding the meaning of the word CONTEXT. They think UT is a stand alone complex operating in a vacuum.Here's the thing about a good S&C program that people don't think about, when you begin to fatigue under heavy lifts it forces you to concentrate on technique and form when you begin to tire, it does not only build your body it builds your mental toughness to coin a butchism, soft S&C, loss of mental edge when fatiqued, can lead to bad technique and sloppiness in game situations and leave a player open and prone to injury.
Actually not it was not. The Oline started its mad keystones cops reenactment that very game. We were already down Kirland, (JRM) was ejected in the first quarter. Chance Hall was hurt before the game and we lost a couple guys during the game on the O-line not to mention JJ had been practicing in the green jersey the weeks leading up to it.The Ohio game is when it went mad when we lost Cam, JRM and Quarte Sapp also Malik foreman was hurt.Something was off from the beginning. Against Appalachian State and Ohio University we looked pretty damn bad. That was before most major injuries.
You're just about as oblivious to realitycrazy
as a supposed football fan can be, young man. OP's thread hit the nail right on the head. 'Proof once again that it's fruitless to argue with a lunatic. Nonetheless...I'll give it a shot.
Now, as for winning so ugly versus Appy State and Ohio: Even the greatest of teams occasionally play down to the competition; only to turn up the jets when the game comes down to the final moments. About the come-from-behind win over VT: With at least a caricature of the team which came out of fall camp, both coaches Shoop and DeBord had at least enough players who could execute a decent number of plays in the playbook, so they took off just before halftime. UF? This game was about adjustments and UT got it straight, then had enough studs in the game to lay it to the gayduhs. The UGA game saw the dawgs playing their best game, and like a championship team the Vols pulled off a play they "believed" they'd make work...and it did. A&M was indicative of the team's resilience, despite the injuries before and during that game. Bammer was impossible to beat by a group that, even if they had all their starters on the field, they still only had a slight chance of pulling it off. USCjr caught our guys disoriented due to the necessary reorientation necessary to be re-tooled by a staff missing some key parts...and for the moral dearth due quite a lot to the J. Hurd situation. Tech was a chance to get some very green players some valuable snaps and then UK's running all over the Vols' defense just makes Bob Shoop earn his big bucks for upcoming Missouri. Let's look forward to the next two games and another shot at bammer. The Vols ought to wind up champions of the SEC east. Got it?:salute:
It's obvious to those who're normal that that wasn't a tirade by any stretch of reason...simply (as I mentioned beforehand) a fruitless attempt to apply reason to a person's own subjective conjecture as it is, indeed, fruitless to argue with a lunatic. Thus: Case in point. Also, I explained that winning out would give the Vols the SECe title and a shot at bammer...nothing in the bag, but chuckle on in your whimsical oblivion.Hope you feel better about yourself after this little tirade. :good!:
I know it gave me a pretty good chuckle this morning being called a lunatic not based in reality by the guy who has the SEC title and a win over Bama in the bag already.
I'll take a stab at this. I wouldn't necessarily say S&C is bad. What is bad imo is I don't think we had a physical camp like years past under Jones. I think that is the biggest problem. If you think about it, I'm not sure we heard even once about practices being physical this year. I know in previous years we heard plenty note the injuries to other teams the previous years.
It's obvious to those who're normal that that wasn't a tirade by any stretch of reason...simply (as I mentioned beforehand) a fruitless attempt to apply reason to a person's own subjective conjecture as it is, indeed, fruitless to argue with a lunatic. Thus: Case in point. Also, I explained that winning out would give the Vols the SECe title and a shot at bammer...nothing in the bag, but chuckle on in your whimsical oblivion.lol:
OK. I'm game. Those of us who've participated in the game are patently aware that the only plays at a coaches disposal are those which have been executed successfully in practice. With a roster so bereft as the Vols could field, a great percentage of those available plays/adjustments/sets aren't any longer available, thus the coaches are left with fewer answers to the plays/adjustments/sets that are being thrown at them by their adversaries, who are also aware of that problem caused by this loss of personnel. Subsequently, the expert wannabes blame the coaches for not implementing those plays/adjustments/sets they think come about just by telling those who they know will botch those plays to do it anyhow. Thus, the playbook, regrettably, must be simplified. Minus the majority of those injuries, UT would already be on easy street at making the trip to Atlanta, and would most likely still be in the conversation for the NCG. Do I blame the injuries as opposed to Butch's play-calling or discipline or to any other deficiency other than personnel attrition? You bet I do. Now. Go away.You sure type a lot to say almost nothing. And you still haven't addressed a single point in my previous post about this team being undisciplined.
Thanks for the bloviation on the injuries though. Haven't seen anyone talking about that. :lol:
Well coached teams don't generally rank near the bottom in the nation in turnover margin and penalties.
Getting players to buy in and play hard and play smart has nothing to do with the injuries.
What has most upset is seeing how unprepared this team is week to week and how sloppy and undisciplined it has become compared to years past.
It's more of being lucky than playing well that has gotten them to 7-3 this season.
When you line your punter up at DT you stop saying it.
Seriously though, it is a stupid phrase.
Yes, next man up....but the next man was already deemed not as good by the coach hence he is a back up....and we he gets hurt that next man up was already deemed not as good as the guy before---by your own coach.
If all players are equal than why not just recruit a roster full of 2 stars and eliminate the recruiting budget?
The next man up stuff is stupid.
Your back ups are back ups for a reason and when you are playing teams like Bama and TX AM and FL you need your starters.