Another Government Shutdown Thread

I honestly don't think its a terrible compromise. You give them an extension but it's not permanent. Of course who's to say this doens't happen again this time next year
If the Rs compromise on an extension it needs to be a 2 or 3 year extension. Otherwise the Ds will pull this same crap right before the mid-terms, it's a trap.
 
From one Mental President to Another with a detour through a woman's dream along the way. All three choices had/have us living in the Ancient History of Rome.
 
If the Rs compromise on an extension it needs to be a 2 or 3 year extension. Otherwise the Ds will pull this same crap right before the mid-terms, it's a trap.
I wouldn't worry about who is going to do what to whom. It all falls on Trump's shoulders.
Both sides will attempt to take their pound of flesh sand spin it in opposite directions, He said she said.

We will hear about this daily until the mid terms are over and there will be plenty more fodder used by Democrats and Republicans to boast their cases.
 
1. I said GDP is a single measure of the economy and on its own it's meaningless. It's like thinking because your heartbeat is normal you're healthy, or because it's a little different for a period you're dying. It's idiotic.
2. I didn't call "all" military people uniformed desk jockeys. I said the overwhelming majority. This is based on actual experience. Learn to read and comprehend, old man.
3. It's clear that you'll never think on your own, since you are either stupid or ignorant enough to think one metric is "muh economy" (like the retards that think the stock market is the economy), and because you can't even be bothered to understand basic words in the English language.

Boomer-ass dingbats like yourself are why we are where we are.
Yes you did by stating overwhelming majority. Based on actual experience? Did you flunk out of Basic Training or get a DHD? I have no idea what Branch of Service you experienced but it makes no difference and I am calling you out. I guess you must have been in the majority as you see it.
Units I served in were first to fight and last out. You must be the guy they put on Point to be a Bullet Stopper.
 
Yes you did by stating overwhelming majority. Based on actual experience? Did you flunk out of Basic Training or get a DHD? I have no idea what Branch of Service you experienced but it makes no difference and I am calling you out. I guess you must have been in the majority as you see it.
Units I served in were first to fight and last out. You must be the guy they put on Point to be a Bullet Stopper.
Did you sustain brain damage that prevents you from comprehending the English language? The VA can help you pump up that disability number (How to file a VA disability claim | Veterans Affairs).

PS: I take it you haven't read, well, any of the rest of my post. Take the butthurt elsewhere, big timer.
 
Read the rest of my posts is your excuse? So you can convince somebody that it is not as idiotic as it sounds of which you probably no nothing about. Your experience is null by the statement you made. Your interpretation I guess.

I am not butthurt at all, just calling you out for a stupid statement of which you know nothing about evidently. I am already a Disabled Vet and it is not because of a brain injury.

You keep telling people to read your posts, maybe it is because you can't write what you are trying to state. You seem to use it as a crunch to avoid being brutally questioned about your statements.

Grow up and learn from experience and quite relying on your own misinterpretations or thoughts.
Deal with reality and not just what you conjure up in your brain. Take accountability for your own words.
 
Read the rest of my posts is your excuse? So you can convince somebody that it is not as idiotic as it sounds of which you probably no nothing about. Your experience is null by the statement you made. Your interpretation I guess.

I am not butthurt at all, just calling you out for a stupid statement of which you know nothing about evidently. I am already a Disabled Vet and it is not because of a brain injury.

You keep telling people to read your posts, maybe it is because you can't write what you are trying to state. You seem to use it as a crunch to avoid being brutally questioned about your statements. Grow up and learn from experience and quite relying on your own misinterpretations or thoughts.
Deal with reality and not just what you conjure up in your brain. Take accountability for your own words.
Try quoting me next time, there, chief.

Where's my experience come from? Sitting on the contractor side watching the military fund a $2B "weapons system" project to build something another branch already has, only to produce zero viable products purely because a bunch of chuckle**** officers needed something to make their "legacy". Sitting in a logistics function watching us order a bunch of XXL uniforms for the fat people that are unemployable elsewhere riding the military chain as far as they could. Watching family members get in and get saddled with bureaucratic ******** dreamed up by some officer and Congressman rather than honing their combat skills. I'll repeat it again, because I have current experience working in both- the military is virtually indistinguishable from civilian government in most of how it operates, with the exception that its lowest level people are paid like donkeys.

90%+ of the people in the military are non combat. Of those, I'd wager 3/4 are either doing obsolete jobs or nothing at all but painting rocks in a field. You want to know why enlistments are suffering and recruiting sucks? Because nobody thinks dying for the country in the same organizations that put some lardass that can't fire a gun into a position to ruin your life is worth it. Whether you like it or not, that's the military of 2025.

Good on you for serving in a combat role. That doesn't make you anywhere close to an expert- in fact, it probably makes you as far from an expert as possible. Other people are allowed to have opinions, especially when you can't even distinguish between "all" and "the majority of" because your wittle womanly feewings get in the way.
 
If the Rs compromise on an extension it needs to be a 2 or 3 year extension. Otherwise the Ds will pull this same crap right before the mid-terms, it's a trap.
That's crap too. You really want to extend Biden administration spending for 2-3 more years? Leave the government shut down into 2026 for all I care.
 
You are full of it.
If You did served, you clearly have no understanding at all. I can only guess you must have been slacking.
You sound as though you have such keen observation skills for tunnel vision to state 90% are non combatant and sitting on their backside. You evidently don't have a clue.

Did you see where or to whom were headed to XXL uniforms, funny thing I had to buy my uniforms after initial issue. Try telling a better story.
90% are not combatant soldiers. Not true and I don't have time to explain that to you.
Again you are trying to save a false statement and beginning to sound like Trump to cover your backside. OBTW I have work at system weapons testing Site at White Sands as a contractor and as a soldier.
If you served, I doubt you were around long enough to know what really happens and how all forces fight.
I had some Admin jobs in DC and FORSCOM did not sit still doing my job. Non Combatant job sure was but it was 24/7 on call.
So I don't get your point.

OBTW, I am as close to an expert as you will ever cross.

Stupid is as stupid does as stupid says. Everybody is entitled to their opinions, you are correct, but when they are off based, taken out of context, and misinformed or disgraceful based on one person's opinion, those opinions need to be called out.






It makes me more of an expert than you.
 
That's crap too. You really want to extend Biden administration spending for 2-3 more years? Leave the government shut down into 2026 for all I care.
Who cares Trump spends just as much. At least it's somewhat a compromise
 
There is a EBT contingency fund that is just for EBT. established under 7 U.S.C. § 2027.
Issue seems to director interpretation

Both (Trump and judge for playing politics) are at fault.

I know we talked about your situation in the past. Are you all good?
 
You are full of it.
If You did served, you clearly have no understanding at all. I can only guess you must have been slacking.
You sound as though you have such keen observation skills for tunnel vision to state 90% are non combatant and sitting on their backside. You evidently don't have a clue.

Did you see where or to whom were headed to XXL uniforms, funny thing I had to buy my uniforms after initial issue. Try telling a better story.
90% are not combatant soldiers. Not true and I don't have time to explain that to you.
Again you are trying to save a false statement and beginning to sound like Trump to cover your backside. OBTW I have work at system weapons testing Site at White Sands as a contractor and as a soldier.
If you served, I doubt you were around long enough to know what really happens and how all forces fight.
I had some Admin jobs in DC and FORSCOM did not sit still doing my job. Non Combatant job sure was but it was 24/7 on call.
So I don't get your point.

OBTW, I am as close to an expert as you will ever cross.

Stupid is as stupid does as stupid says. Everybody is entitled to their opinions, you are correct, but when they are off based, taken out of context, and misinformed or disgraceful based on one person's opinion, those opinions need to be called out.






It makes me more of an expert than you.
This would make a lot more sense if it was written with better grammar and less butthurt, big timer. I'd also point out that you're putting on me several claims that I've never made.

Now, when you can prove to me I'm making up the non-combatant number, I'll take you seriously. Go ahead, dig around, see what you can find. When you can prove to me what I've said is "false", you can sling your mud.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top