zeppelin128
Look at the bones!
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2014
- Messages
- 23,197
- Likes
- 32,886
Here's a thought I sense you will find odd.Why did this need to be publicly disclosed?
Here's a thought I sense you will find odd.
1. Hypocrisy of Hannity not disclosing his relationship with Cohen when he is mouthing off about the corruptness of Mueller and expressing outrage over the FBI raiding Cohens residence, office and hotel room as he defends Trump, ineptly, almost every night
2. It points up the steps those of Trumps surrogates are willing to go to to attempt to massage the image of Trump
Let me know if you need more reasons.
Question for you. Why do you attempt to conceal your racism with your Avatar when many of your posts out you as a blatant racist
Hannity is a moron. Check this quote:
"...Fox News host Sean Hannity, while speaking on his radio show, insisted that he never paid a retainer fee to attorney Michael Cohen for legal fees.
However, Hannity said he might paid him for attorney-client privilege.
"What else can you say except that, 'I never gave him a retainer, never received an invoice, never paid any fees,'" he said. "I might have handed him 10 bucks. 'I definitely want attorney-client privilege on this.' Something like that.""
Oh, sure. You never retained Cohen, you never received an invoice from Cohen, but you gave him a $10 bill. LMAO.
Newsflash: If you didn't retain him and you never received an invoice, you're not a client dip****. There is no attorney client privilege, because you're not a client. Clearly he wants what's hidden here to remain hidden. This is going to get juicy.
View attachment 155815
Will he inform us of the crimes committed by Hannity?
Hannity has done more to harm this country over the past 20 years than any other single person. I don't even know of a close second. Maybe Roger Ailes.
We don't know them.
Yet.
Ok, now I've had my fun. Fact is that Hannity might just have occasionally asked him about his contract with Fox, or about writing a book, or whatever. Might be absolutely no issue, no shenanigans by Hannity at all.
But what this is about is that Cohen's lawyers went in and made it sound to the judge like he had a bunch of clients whose "secrets" might be exposed by the document review. So the judge started asking questions. And on Friday Cohen's lawyers didn't know who these other "clients" were.
So today Cohen comes in and says Trump, the RNC guy, and an unnamed third client. The judge says no, no. Not good enough. Who is it and what is the issue?
So Cohen says its Hannity. He's reaching. Trying to make it seem like other clients' stuff is at risk. It really isn't, and Trump and the RNC guy were in deep shenanigans. That's what Cohen worked on, that's it.
So maybe Hannity is off the hook at the end. That's fine. But it just goes to show you how much of a weasel Cohen is to invoke this third client as needing protection, when he really isn't a client at all.