Angel Reese or Caitlin Clark is GOAT…and Sakerlina Banner!

[DarkPhoenix]

Your list is not sorted correctly. If #4 - #7 are out of order, what else might be wrong with it?

I like the Win Share stat, while no stat is perfect, what stat could be more useful than the player's contribution to winning?

It’s not my list, it’s the WNBA. I’m sure they have different factors, u can ask them to explain if you want. You like Wn Shares and I like Efficiency, and that’s ok.

 

[chuckiepoo]

It's not "used to assign trade values" at all, Naz Hillmon or Veronica Burton do not have more trade value than Kiki Iriafen for example

True. “One of the metrics” would have been a better way to state it.

 

[chuckiepoo]

Your list is not sorted correctly. If #4 - #7 are out of order, what else might be wrong with it?

I like the Win Share stat, while no stat is perfect, what stat could be more useful than the player's contribution to winning?

Obviously not sorted by efficiency.

 

[chuckiepoo]

Efficiency shows how u are across the board, and Angel is top 5 in the WNBA. I’m still waiting for them to tell me where Rodman ever did any of these things.

View attachment 759931

Got a link so someone can provide an assist?

Found it:

Players Advanced

League Players Advanced Stats

stats.wnba.com

 

[DarkPhoenix]

Got a link so someone can provide an assist?

Season Leaders

The official leaders for the latest WNBA season. Features the ability to filter by season, season type, per mode, stat category, and more.

stats.wnba.com

 

[37620VOL]

Season Leaders

The official leaders for the latest WNBA season. Features the ability to filter by season, season type, per mode, stat category, and more.

stats.wnba.com

Something is weird or broken on the W site. It is only listing 66 players, and it doesn't sort them correctly either. Not blaming you, but that list is worthless.

 

[DarkPhoenix]

Something is weird or broken on the W site. It is only listing 66 players, and it doesn't sort them correctly either. Not blaming you, but that list is worthless.

I’m not sure what’s that about, maybe players being eligible or something idk.

 

[chuckiepoo]

Something is weird or broken on the W site. It is only listing 66 players, and it doesn't sort them correctly either. Not blaming you, but that list is worthless.

I’m assuming there’s a cut off of total minutes for the efficiency stat. That’s pretty fair.

Angel is clearly in the top five of those listed.

 

[37620VOL]

I’m assuming there’s a cut off of total minutes for the efficiency stat. That’s pretty fair.

Angel is clearly in the top five of those listed.

If you sort it by total instead of by game and limit it to >15 games played, there are 126 players. It doesn't have them in the right order but Angel would appear to be in the 8-12 range.

Whoa, there are some flaws in this data. Go down to Nalyssa Smith. It says she's played in 58 games this season.

 

[37620VOL]

DPho, don't get the impression that I'm negative on Reese. I've been thinking about NBA comparisons a little more and maybe Reese compares a little better to Charles Barkley. I originally picked Rodman because they both have a very distinctive skill for rebounds. I still think that comparison works; Rodman was one of my favorites, at least until he went loco.