i heard stubborness. Doesnt wanna change a damn thing. Lets just keep running our 5 plays on offense while every other team thinks outside the box and attacks.
I do analytics as part of my job every day. Analytics is a guide, not a gospel. Sometimes we have to make decisions based on the situation, rather than what raw numbers tells us because each scenario and its variables are different in a given situation.
But if Butch wants to go analytics, then he needs to take a look at the decision to go conservative mid-way through the 2nd Quarter. And run some thorough analysis on why they kept running the same plays through the 2nd half when they were getting shut down.
Analytics, physicality. Worry more about winning a game instead of impressing the fan base with your vocabulary! Sorry CBJ not accepting responsibility for this game pisses me off.
In his presser today he said that OU did not make adjustments at halftime.k:
He was a 1/2 yard away from a TD and had a more than physically capable RB in Hurd who had a good chance of punching it in and, even if the try had failed, OU would have had to have been forced to go 99 yards for a score.
I am not against analytics in certain situations, but you go for it there....every time.
We weren't at midfield. We were on their half yard line. If you don't get it you force them to go 99.5 yards in front of our frenzied crowd vs our defense which was playing great. We also have a certain large running back that should've been relied on to get a foot and a half of real estate. As it turns out, those 4 extra points would've been in the difference in the game. Have to show confidence in your team there to win that battle and set the tone IMO.
CBJ said that analytics went into the decision to kick the field goal from the 8 inch line. 4 or 5 hours of planning.
He says that the coaching staff leaves nothing to chance.
I believe CBJ is a good coach and is on the right track, but do any of you agree that relying too much on such logical analysis handicaps you in game situations.
Mr. Spock made an excellent science officer but...
CBJ said that analytics went into the decision to kick the field goal from the 8 inch line. 4 or 5 hours of planning.
He says that the coaching staff leaves nothing to chance.
I believe CBJ is a good coach and is on the right track, but do any of you agree that relying too much on such logical analysis handicaps you in game situations.
Mr. Spock made an excellent science officer but...
![]()
Retweeted by @daniel_hood5855
LOL.....so many opinions and not a single, solitary one qualified to coach SEC football.
CBJ has yet to prove that he belongs as well. So what does that say? His greatest accomplishment in 3 years in a couple wins over South Carolina. I think CBJ is capable of 7-9 wins per year, but that will be his max. The only way he surpasses that is to hire top level coordinators and let them run the show.
Hearing this is what bothered me the most about the coaching Saturday. It's always easy to blame the coaches, but even though their play calling lacked aggression, this was the perfect storm of things going wrong: Alex Ellis dropped sure TD pass, offensive penalties, Hurd's fumble, Pearson falling down on a counter with room to run, phantom defensive holding penalties, etc. etc.
However, not going for it on 4th down and using the reasoning against as analytics is BS. I'm all for using probabilities 90% of the time, but big time coaches in big games, have to take chances on the fly. Sometimes you just have to say **ck it, we're going to kick your butt and run you right over with our best. We have the players to do this now. Butch needs to take notice and do it.
Stoops did it in the end with Shepard - and it worked. Same thing with the WR's. Use your best- establish a go to guy and throw him the dang ball. The analytics crap is BS if you want to win championships.