1) Wrong. Should someone be at fault and have to pay in the death of an animal, they have to pay for progeny and future income potential. In this case, they would owe for eight offspring per animal and all the loss of income from the I'll begotten guv'ment checks received in the dogs' names.
2) You made an absurd assumption here. In assuming that any animal that close to a trailer wasn't claimed as tomorrow's dinner or the weekend's bride was senseless. See answer 1 for the real ruling.
3) Just like a idiotic AL clown to make fun of the property owner. If you idiots could cheat the government out of just a few more dollars per month, you could move up to Cousin Eddie Territory (see answer 1 for ideas). As to our side, why would we upgrade the property for two-bit clowns who don't know the difference? See, it works well for us. We own the property and make reasonable money for it. We pay taxes that support a lot of upgrades to our nation. Those upgrades clearly pass Alabama by, but nobody cares because it's AL. Those tax dollars also pay you clowns to live in our trailers (and we realize the cheating and theft), then you tur and hand the money back to us. That little circle is perfect. Without, shiftless, stupid as worthless, the little circle gets broken. We have you to thank. Let me be first: thank you.
4) Well, here's where your grammar lesso didn't pay off for me. You said the university can't legally be held liable for said cheating, which confused me, given that your grammar is better than ours, as you stated. See, I thought I could hold the university liable for lack of oversight and avoid running afoul of the law. Your wording here says that I might be in trouble for so doing. What are my legal rights here? Am I confused or is your adverb usage here just a reflection of the education I would expect in AL?
Posted via VolNation Mobile