Sandvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2010
- Messages
- 12,785
- Likes
- 3,723
Maybe if you came across more like here is what I think and why rather than a pompous know it all who has to come in to educate the unwashed masses on the only correct way to view the case your arguments might gain more traction
So the way I presented it bothered you? Sorry to hurt your feelings. I guess I need to tread more lightly so as not to offend anyone. But, the truth is the truth no matter how it is presented. I replied to this thread by recommending people read the Massei report. That was too hard for everyone. When everyone undoubtedly refused to read it and started printing "easy" and factually wrong tabloid material my only goal was to correct what was posted and point out the facts. Is it my fault no one cares to discover what the facts are themselves? It does require a little work. But, instead of appreciating what I did so that you don't look so ignorant when discussing the case with your friends you resent me for it. Doesn't make sense.
You just proved my point. I know it may be hard for you to believe, but my friends have better topics of discussion than a murder case that has no bearing on my life or theirs.
So the way I presented it bothered you? Sorry to hurt your feelings. I guess I need to tread more lightly so as not to offend anyone. But, the truth is the truth no matter how it is presented. I replied to this thread by recommending people read the Massei report. That was too hard for everyone. When everyone undoubtedly refused to read it and started printing "easy" and factually wrong tabloid material my only goal was to correct what was posted and point out the facts. Is it my fault no one cares to discover what the facts are themselves? It does require a little work. But, instead of appreciating what I did so that you don't look so ignorant when discussing the case with your friends you resent me for it. Doesn't make sense.
You just proved my point. When her extradition hearing goes forward this is going to be a media circus. It will be front-page news. Everyone will be discussing it. And, when sitting around a table and one of your friends might say she's innocent and I can't believe they are allowing this to happen then you might say, "not so fast, have you actually read the facts of the case." Well maybe not you probably don't want to offend anyone.
You just proved my point. When her extradition hearing goes forward this is going to be a media circus. It will be front-page news. Everyone will be discussing it. And, when sitting around a table and one of your friends might say she's innocent and I can't believe they are allowing this to happen then you might say, "not so fast, have you actually read the facts of the case." Well maybe not you probably don't want to offend anyone.
What is interesting is that if she had just pled guilty and fast tracked her trial she would probably be getting out about now. But, she has served 4 years and will have about 24 more to go. She will have to serve most of that.