DinkinFlicka
Erect Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 32,631
- Likes
- 29,902
The story that the market has been telling about AI in general over the last several weeks is strange and contradictory to me. Seems like it will be made consistent one way or the other at some point.
For the last several weeks, the names supposed to benefit from AI have been flat to down. The names supposed to be disrupted from AI have been getting annihilated (software, etc.). You have people on X and other places talking about how it is going to completely disrupt every industry, make millions of jobs unnecessary, etc., while simultaneously saying that the capex spend is a big waste of money. How can it be both of those things?
Haven't posted in awhile.
I recently took a large position in VITL. They've posted some strong earnings over the last year plus, yet the stock has been beat down pretty hard since they peaked at $53 back in August. Earnings will post in a little over a week and they are expected to post strong earnings again. It's been a very volatile stock over the last 2 years, so this is strictly a couple months swing for me and not a long term hold. But the volatility also presents a strong opportunity for some massive gains in the short term. If traces back up to August highs in the coming months, that's a 100% gainer.
With the energy consumption required by these data centers going forward, took a position in VST a couple of weeks ago with its pullback. Picks and hammers approach. Been expanding their nuclear capacity via acquisitions. Concern is booting up new nuke facilities is excruciatingly slow, but we’re going to have to likely have more to meet data center power demand.


I don't think yesterday was about tariffs. Wasn't a coincidence that every specific name mentioned in that Citrini piece got slammed. The market seems to have marked up everything it thinks is going to benefit from AI, and now is marking down things that it thinks will be hurt by it. Whether it is correct or incorrect in doing so is TBD.Another stupid tariff tantrum in the market. S&P up about 40% from the last tantrum lows in April 2025. Don't fall for it, stay the course.
I don't think yesterday was about tariffs. Wasn't a coincidence that every specific name mentioned in that Citrini piece got slammed. The market seems to have marked up everything it thinks is going to benefit from AI, and now is marking down things that it thinks will be hurt by it. Whether it is correct or incorrect in doing so is TBD.
But desk jockey pencil pushers shouldn’t have ever been getting compensated considerably more than plumbers, electricians, and other skilled labor workers.
Why not? Wages are determined by supply and demand and how easily you are to replace, not how "hard" or "important" the job is. Should Kim Kardashian make more than a pediatric cancer doctor?It’s difficult to figure it all out. I think that the software sell off is over done. AI can help create it, but I’d think that it makes developers and software producers much more efficient and effective than enabling companies to create their own versions of the programming.
White collar jobs are more vulnerable. But desk jockey pencil pushers shouldn’t have ever been getting compensated considerably more than plumbers, electricians, and other skilled labor workers.
Shouldn’t have ever? I would wager most desk jockeys could learn to be a plumber. Not sure that most plumbers could learn to be an engineer or accountant.
Having said that, I’ve seen plenty of welders and electricians earn more than a “desk jockey.”
Why not? Wages are determined by supply and demand and how easily you are to replace, not how "hard" or "important" the job is. Should Kim Kardashian make more than a pediatric cancer doctor?
Hasn't been my experience. To the extent that I've seen it, DEI is something trendy that they thought they needed to pay lip service to.In the real office world, DEI took over. And many of the better jobs have been getting filled based on who their daddy is.
As far as DEI, the letters brigade were highly sought after at a big company that I worked for.
In the real office world, DEI took over. And many of the better jobs have been getting filled based on who their daddy is.
As far as DEI, the letters brigade were highly sought after at a big company that I worked for.
The real office world? I've worked in real offices - DEI isn't even something that is discussed much anymore. Large companies are political, yes, and often chase shiny objects, often at the behest of investment banks and/or consultants. Six Sigma, Toyota Way, DEI, ESG, etc, etc. They all seem to fade with time, though.
Additionally, I'm sure it is rare that the "daddy" passes on the family electrical, plumbing, whatever business they run to the kid(s). Who you know touches virtually every industry/job.
"This is just like the Bear Stearns HFs that blew up in 2007" is an attention-grabbing headline. While there are parallels there, I don't think bad loans in private credit have infested the financial system to anywhere near the same extent residential mortgages did. That was the whole point of the reforms after GFC; to get stuff like that off the balance sheets of the commercial banks.Yesterday a couple of the destroyed shares that I own were some of the leaders. Maybe a sign tgat the selling was overdone.
The most talked about stock in the financial media is Blue Owl. Even though it’s not having complimentary comments, they’re getting a ton of PR. It’s almost like the media has been told that they need to discuss the name every hour.
