DinkinFlicka
Erect Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 32,451
- Likes
- 29,534
LOL! I do get it, but gheeeezzz....
This market.......???
Who ARE these people....?
That CPI report from yesterday just doesn't feel very valid to me. But, whatever.........GO VOLS!!!
Interesting thought on the lack of losers this year...hmmmm
I haven’t scanned through all the names, but the largest techs have carried the averages. They’ve been under pressure for a few weeks though as funds are locking in profits and rebalancing for 2026. Plus, IMO, there’s a fear of AI repeating the dot com bubble of 25 years ago. But I believe that the data centers and the cloud based data transmission infrastructure are long term opportunities even if AI tempers.
The rotation to the Buffett type of names didn’t seem to happen. Good chance that the best of the rest (non Mag7s) will make positive moves in 2026.
Robust housing could drive the economy.
Housing could be poised for big moves as the administration keeps throwing around terms of urgency regarding it.
That would surprise me greatly. My read is that they are just pretending to be fair.Their questions and comments at the hearing sounded to me like they will.
A major difference is that McKinley's tariffs were enacted with congressional legislation. That's the issue. Taxes fall under the Legislative branch, not Executive.That would surprise me greatly. My read is that they are just pretending to be fair.
Tariffs aren't a new idea. Couple of months ago, read a book about President McKinley. He loved tariffs in 1900.
Flipping back and forth between two political parties, I don't see them as a long-term solution.
But a dabble here and there has always been acceptable under our constitution.
I'm strictly stocks (I don't really care about my retirement from USG).Wow! What a year. Congrats!
If you don't mind sharing, which financial funds are hitting that level? My Vanguard / Fidelity stuff is more mid-20%'s.
I'm not complaining. God bless America!
