Rather them be like AJ Johnson or Jameis Winston?
I do not understand why AJ can not get the benefit of the doubt..
This is america..innocent until proven otherwise?
But so many want to condemn over an arrest.
Sorry but I have been arrested over women making false allegations.
I could go make a police report on any person in this forum and have them arrested today..does not make it true that they did anything, yet people's reputations are destroyed...just sayin
I do not understand why AJ can not get the benefit of the doubt..
This is america..innocent until proven otherwise?
But so many want to condemn over an arrest.
Sorry but I have been arrested over women making false allegations.
I could go make a police report on any person in this forum and have them arrested today..does not make it true that they did anything, yet people's reputations are destroyed...just sayin
I do not understand why AJ can not get the benefit of the doubt..
This is america..innocent until proven otherwise?
But so many want to condemn over an arrest.
Sorry but I have been arrested over women making false allegations.
I could go make a police report on any person in this forum and have them arrested today..does not make it true that they did anything, yet people's reputations are destroyed...just sayin
I do not understand why AJ can not get the benefit of the doubt..
This is america..innocent until proven otherwise?
But so many want to condemn over an arrest.
Sorry but I have been arrested over women making false allegations.
I could go make a police report on any person in this forum and have them arrested today..does not make it true that they did anything, yet people's reputations are destroyed...just sayin
That's just simply not true. If you don't have any evidence of a crime possibly being committed, no one is getting arrested.
Oh OK, understood. I was replying to a post that was discussing someone's 30-some-odd years in law enforcement who said (or implied) that most rape cases involved men from "the hood." I don't think that he was discussing just college athletes and rape. I see that this appeared OT, and I apologize for any thread-jack, however unintended. I get irritated at the implication that crimes like this belong to a different group, "them", not "us."
I agree that with the current reality that many potential college (and pro) athletes come from environments that see sports as one of the few ways out, we're going to see students who don't fit the usual college student profile, and I completely agree that many didn't get the guidance needed on how a man should behave. OTOH, I know an awful lot of young men from privileged backgrounds who attended ridiculously expensive private schools who didn't get this either.
--Just to veer off yet again, I'm amazed at the posters who are blaming this (if it even happened) on Jones. Are they saying that anyone, including a college coach, is supposed to be able to look at a relative stranger and determine whether they are not only capable of rape, but likely to commit rape, and therefore shouldn't recruit them? That's just ridiculous.
If a woman gets drunk she deserves whatever comes her way.
Well that's what I've read in some posts here.
I don't know how it is in Oregon...but in North Carolina a woman can tell the police you said you were "going to hit her" and you get a free ride uptown to the concrete condo and a free meal for the night. I have seen it happen. I hate all this crap, I'm signing off until the spring game...
If a woman gets drunk she deserves whatever comes her way.
Well that's what I've read in some posts here.
