Ain't it funny....

#27
#27
Folks like Clause cause he whooped up on florida.
Mind you florida was really down one of those years(03)
and Clause had far better players around him.
On that 01 team every player he threw to and handed the ball off to was on a NFL roster within 2 years.
Stephens, Stallworth, Witten, Washington,
Think he also had wash blocking for him

On the other side he played for RS while Ainge got to play for cut.
 
#28
#28
dickens821 said:
Bottom line.... I would rather have Clausen in the SECC last year. With him we win.
Click to expand...

lol so now that your argument of statistics is broken, you go on gut instinct that Clausen is better.

So before when you said the stats speak for themself, now you're saying they don't?

Keep peddling backwards, your arguments keep helping me.:clapping:
 
#31
#31
Lucky Dice said:
lol so now that your argument of statistics is broken, you go on gut instinct that Clausen is better.

So before when you said the stats speak for themself, now you're saying they don't?

Keep peddling backwards, your arguments keep helping me.:clapping:
Click to expand...

You are incorrect on your stats...Here are the correct stats right from utsports.com. Now what do you have to say for yourself?
University of Tennessee Football Official Athletic Site

Casey Clausen Stats
PASSING STATISTICS
Class/Year CMP ATT PCT. INT YDS TD LONG
Fr. 2000 121 194 62.4 6 1473 15 60-UM
So. 2001 227 354 64.1 9 2969 22 80-VU
Jr. 2002 194 310 62.6 7 2297 11 58-Rutgers
Sr.2003 233 412 56.6 9 2968 27 90-UGA
TOTALS 775 1270 61.0 31 9707 75 90-UGA

RUSHING STATISTICS
Class/Year NO YDS AVG TD LONG
Fr. 2000 40 -42 -1.0 0 11-UG
So. 2001 64 -36 -0.6 3 15-UK
Jr. 2002 61 -7 -0.1 1 14-UK
Sr. 2003 64 -45 -0.7 2 16-MU

TOTALS 229 -130 -0.6 6 16-MU
 
#32
#32
Lucky Dice said:
And to whom ever said that Clausen's stats were better than Ainge's are you blind?

I just looked at them, and Ainge's are better than Clausens across the board. For his career, and if you take their best seasons and compare.


Clausen career stats
Total yards: 8234
TD's: 60

Erik Ainge career stats
Total yards: 8700
TD's: 72


Clausens best year 2003:
Completion %:56.6%
Yards:2968
TD's:27
Int:9
Rating:134.32


Ainge's best year 2007:
Completion %:62.6%
Yards:3522
TD's:31
Int:10
Rating:135.48
Click to expand...


Not sure where you got some of those stats but they are not all correct.

Per UT's Media guide

Clausen career yards 9,707 TD's 75
Completion % career 61.0%

Ainge 8,700 TD's 72
Comp % career 60.6
 
#35
#35
VolGrad 04' said:
You are incorrect on your stats...Here are the correct stats right from utsports.com. Now what do you have to say for yourself?
University of Tennessee Football Official Athletic Site

Casey Clausen Stats
PASSING STATISTICS
Class/Year CMP ATT PCT. INT YDS TD LONG
Fr. 2000 121 194 62.4 6 1473 15 60-UM
So. 2001 227 354 64.1 9 2969 22 80-VU
Jr. 2002 194 310 62.6 7 2297 11 58-Rutgers
Sr.2003 233 412 56.6 9 2968 27 90-UGA
TOTALS 775 1270 61.0 31 9707 75 90-UGA

RUSHING STATISTICS
Class/Year NO YDS AVG TD LONG
Fr. 2000 40 -42 -1.0 0 11-UG
So. 2001 64 -36 -0.6 3 15-UK
Jr. 2002 61 -7 -0.1 1 14-UK
Sr. 2003 64 -45 -0.7 2 16-MU

TOTALS 229 -130 -0.6 6 16-MU
Click to expand...

JZVOL said:
Not sure where you got some of those stats but they are not all correct.

Per UT's Media guide

Clausen career yards 9,707 TD's 75
Completion % career 61.0%

Ainge 8,700 TD's 72
Comp % career 60.6
Click to expand...

I got his career stats at ESPN. My bad. Sorry for mistake on Career Stats.
 
#37
#37
VolGrad 04' said:
Your whole arument was based on your incorrect "stats." Now what will you base your argument on?
Click to expand...

Ainge's best season stats are still better than Clausen's.

And it wasn't an argument for me, someone else was saying that Clausen's stats were better. I just went to check them out, and I guess ESPN has the wrong career stats up for Clausen.
 
#39
#39
gatorhater_35 said:
IMO Clausen had as much talent as ainge but good ole randy sanders made him worse... Ainge would have been a lot worse than clausen if sanders was still here and not Cut so what is comes down to is Cut>Sanders
Click to expand...

I'm not going to disagree that Cut > Sanders, but Casey did not have as much talent as Ainge. Clausen was small without a great arm. Ainge was big with a rifle. I am actually a fan of Casey because he was able to have success through grit and heady play in spite of his physical limitations.

dickens821 said:
Bottom line.... I would rather have Clausen in the SECC last year. With him we win.
Click to expand...

Based on Casey's numerous SEC championships?
 
#40
#40
cotton said:
I'm not going to disagree that Cut > Sanders, but Casey did not have as much talent as Ainge. Clausen was small without a great arm. Ainge was big with a rifle. I am actually a fan of Casey because he was able to have success through grit and heady play in spite of his physical limitations.



Based on Casey's numerous SEC championships?
Click to expand...

Based on him not coughing it up twice in the last moments of important games.
 
#41
#41
Lucky Dice said:
lol so now that your argument of statistics is broken, you go on gut instinct that Clausen is better.

So before when you said the stats speak for themself, now you're saying they don't?

Keep peddling backwards, your arguments keep helping me.:clapping:
Click to expand...

There's some egg on your face...
And I never said the stats spoke for themselves. But apparently they do.
 
#43
#43
cotton said:
I'm not going to disagree that Cut > Sanders, but Casey did not have as much talent as Ainge. Clausen was small without a great arm. Ainge was big with a rifle. I am actually a fan of Casey because he was able to have success through grit and heady play in spite of his physical limitations.



Based on Casey's numerous SEC championships?
Click to expand...

You are probably correct that Ainge has more talent and a bigger arm. But do you ever remember that arm being on display? I don't his last two years. I know he had a pinky injury last year but I cannot remember one deep throw from Ainge the last few years. When Clausen was around I remember him connecting on plenty of deep balls.
 
#44
#44
Lucky Dice said:
Ainge's best season stats are still better than Clausen's.

And it wasn't an argument for me, someone else was saying that Clausen's stats were better. I just went to check them out, and I guess ESPN has the wrong career stats up for Clausen.
Click to expand...

And Ainge's worst season is far worse than Clausen's worst season.
 
#45
#45
VolGrad 04' said:
You are probably correct that Ainge has more talent and a bigger arm. But do you ever remember that arm being on display? I don't his last two years. I know he had a pinky injury last year but I cannot remember one deep throw from Ainge the last few years. When Clausen was around I remember him connecting on plenty of deep balls.
Click to expand...

Ainge had plenty of deep balls in 06.
 
#47
#47
dickens821 said:
Based on him not coughing it up twice in the last moments of important games.
Click to expand...

Interceptions or not, I'm not sure how losing to an inferior LSU team in the championship is any better than losing to a superior one.
 
#48
#48
cotton said:
Interceptions or not, I'm not sure how losing to an inferior LSU team in the championship is any better than losing to a superior one.
Click to expand...

Would you say that loss was completely on his shoulders?

I wouldn't

07 was on Ainge.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top