Ainge is on again

#26
#26
Originally posted by GAVol@Nov 26, 2005 1:09 PM
I've seen a few people say that, and I disagree.  If you're going to throw out of your own endzone it seems to me that it's a lot safer to move the pocket.
[snapback]202799[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Moving the pocket takes time... I say if you throw it, make it a quick 3-stepper, and an outside slant/hook route a few yards out.
 
#27
#27
Originally posted by thebiglowboski@Nov 26, 2005 4:09 PM
well i guess the review officials missed that one then huh???
[snapback]202800[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

It's not reviewable. It's a judgement call made on the field.
 
#28
#28
Originally posted by thebiglowboski@Nov 26, 2005 4:09 PM
well i guess the review officials missed that one then huh???
[snapback]202800[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

It wasn't even reviewed. And since when do you defend refs over your own team?
 
#29
#29
Originally posted by milohimself@Nov 26, 2005 4:11 PM
Moving the pocket takes time... I say if you throw it, make it a quick 3-stepper, and an outside slant/hook route a few yards out.
[snapback]202804[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


I'll agree with that . . . the bigger question though is why even bother throwing the ball off your own goal line with a 3 TD lead?
 
#30
#30
Originally posted by thebiglowboski@Nov 26, 2005 4:09 PM
well i guess the review officials missed that one then huh???
[snapback]202800[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


I'm watching the replay now. He was clearly outside the tackle box and clearly had a receiver in the area.
 
#31
#31
Originally posted by CSpindizzy@Nov 26, 2005 4:07 PM
It has to not only make it back to the line AND he has to be inside the tackle box. It didn't meet both criteria and there was a receiver in the area on top of all of that!
[snapback]202794[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


It didn't meet those two criteria in a BAD way. It not only didn't make it to the line, but he was also inside the tackles.

On top of that, while there was a reciever remotely in the area, he was clearly in the grasp, going down, and just desperately flinging it.

It was the definition of intentional grounding.
 
#32
#32
Originally posted by GAVol@Nov 26, 2005 4:11 PM
It's not reviewable.  It's a judgement call made on the field.
[snapback]202806[/snapback]​
Click to expand...



REVIEWABLE PLAYS:
1. Plays governed by sideline, goal line, end zone and end line
a. Scoring plays, including a runner breaking the plane of the goal line.
b. Pass complete/incomplete, intercepted at sideline, goal line and end line
c. Runner/receiver in or out of bounds
d. Recovery of loose ball in and out of bounds
2. Passing Plays
a. Pass ruled complete/incomplete/intercepted in the field of play and end zones
b. Touching of a forward pass by an ineligible receiver
c. Touching of a forward pass by a defensive player
d. Quarterback (passer) forward pass or fumble (if ruled incomplete, play is final)
e. Illegal forward pass or illegal handing off beyond the line of scrimmage
f. Illegal forward pass or illegal handing off after change of possession
g. Forward or backward pass thrown from behind the line of scrimmage
3. Other Detectable Infractions
a. Runner ruled not down
b. Forward progress with respect to first down
c. Touching of a kick
d. Number of players on the field
e. Clock adjustments (in conjunction with overturned plays)
f. Fourth-down try fumble plays

NOT REVIEWABLE
1. Holding
2. Off-sides/encroachment
3. Pass interference
4. Personal fouls (like late hits)
5. Illegal blocks
6. Illegal formations
7. Face mask
8. Taunting/excessive celebration
9. False starts
10. Roughing the passer/kicker
11. Fighting participants
 
#33
#33
Originally posted by GAVol@Nov 26, 2005 4:12 PM
I'll agree with that . . . the bigger question though is why even bother throwing the ball off your own goal line with a 3 TD lead?
[snapback]202811[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


ESPECIALLY given Ainges recent goal line history. Just don't know why you put him in a position to fail.
 
#34
#34
Originally posted by CSpindizzy@Nov 26, 2005 4:12 PM
It wasn't even reviewed. And since when do you defend refs over your own team?
[snapback]202808[/snapback]​
Click to expand...



Every call is reviewed in cass you didnt know that!!! they do not stop the game for all of them!!!!


reviewed the calls that can be reviewed!!! and this one according to the rules should be reviewed illegal forward pass!!!!
 
#35
#35
Originally posted by MemphisVol@Nov 26, 2005 4:13 PM
It didn't meet those two criteria in a BAD way.  It not only didn't make it to the line, but he was also inside the tackles.

On top of that, while there was a reciever remotely in the area, he was clearly in the grasp, going down, and just desperately flinging it.

It was the definition of intentional grounding.
[snapback]202813[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


You're crazy. He was WAY outside the tackles. Tell me what yard line the ball landed.
 
#36
#36
Originally posted by Lexvol@Nov 26, 2005 4:10 PM
Not to mention the fact that Foster had two touchdowns called back as well.
[snapback]202801[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

The first one was just a sick run. I bet he ran 100 yards on that play, he is going to be a good one.
 
#37
#37
Originally posted by CSpindizzy@Nov 26, 2005 4:12 PM
It wasn't even reviewed. And since when do you defend refs over your own team?
[snapback]202808[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


It's not our fault. After 13 years we're developing a thing for old fat men with mental problems.......
 
#38
#38
This I know this about EA. When they played UAB, I was there, he was overthrowing that game, and did so for the rest of the year. Today, I didn't see that. :clapping:
 
#39
#39
Originally posted by utfantilidie@Nov 26, 2005 4:15 PM
This I know this about EA. When they played UAB, I was there, he was overthrowing that game, and did so for the rest of the year. Today, I didn't see that. :clapping:
[snapback]202825[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Exaclty. He has not played well against any of the other crap defenses they played this year but today his mind seemed to be there again.
 
#40
#40
Originally posted by thebiglowboski@Nov 26, 2005 4:14 PM
Every call is reviewed in cass you didnt know that!!! they do not stop the game for all of them!!!!
[snapback]202819[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

It still doesn't matter. It was a bad call. You're telling me that every game is perfectly called? You're telling me you would believe the refs in every game and they'd never make a mistake? Or is your bias against Ainge just that much?
 
#41
#41
Originally posted by CSpindizzy@Nov 26, 2005 4:14 PM
You're crazy. He was WAY outside the tackles. Tell me what yard line the ball landed.
[snapback]202820[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


In reverse order:

3. the third cheerleader from the left prefers the term yard "person"

2. the line is where the tackles would be if they didn't fall down

3. yes, but isn't it attractive?
 
#42
#42
Originally posted by CSpindizzy@Nov 26, 2005 4:17 PM
It still doesn't matter. It was a bad call. You're telling me that every game is perfectly called? You're telling me you would believe the refs in every game and they'd never make a mistake? Or is your bias against Ainge just that much?
[snapback]202829[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

There have been plenty of bad calls in the SEC this year, many after review.
 
#43
#43
Originally posted by CSpindizzy@Nov 26, 2005 4:17 PM
It still doesn't matter. It was a bad call. You're telling me that every game is perfectly called? You're telling me you would believe the refs in every game and they'd never make a mistake? Or is your bias against Ainge just that much?
[snapback]202829[/snapback]​
Click to expand...



im not saying every game is called correct!!!! im telling you you are not a ref!!! and that the plays that can be reviewed is always reviewed!! They dont stop the game for everyone!!!! And since you are so sure maybe you should apply for the job since 2 different refs was incorrect!!
 
#44
#44
Originally posted by thebiglowboski@Nov 26, 2005 4:13 PM
REVIEWABLE PLAYS:
1. Plays governed by sideline, goal line, end zone and end line
    a. Scoring plays, including a runner breaking the plane of the goal line.
    b. Pass complete/incomplete, intercepted at sideline, goal line and end line
    c. Runner/receiver in or out of bounds
    d. Recovery of loose ball in and out of bounds
2. Passing Plays
    a. Pass ruled complete/incomplete/intercepted in the field of play and end zones
    b. Touching of a forward pass by an ineligible receiver
    c. Touching of a forward pass by a defensive player
    d. Quarterback (passer) forward pass or fumble (if ruled incomplete, play is final)
    e. Illegal forward pass or illegal handing off beyond the line of scrimmage
    f. Illegal forward pass or illegal handing off after change of possession
    g. Forward or backward pass thrown from behind the line of scrimmage
3. Other Detectable Infractions
    a. Runner ruled not down
    b. Forward progress with respect to first down
    c. Touching of a kick
    d. Number of players on the field
    e. Clock adjustments (in conjunction with overturned plays)
    f. Fourth-down try fumble plays

NOT REVIEWABLE
1. Holding
2. Off-sides/encroachment
3. Pass interference
4. Personal fouls (like late hits)
5. Illegal blocks
6. Illegal formations
7. Face mask
8. Taunting/excessive celebration
9. False starts
10. Roughing the passer/kicker
11. Fighting participants
[snapback]202816[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

See, post like this is why you gotta love this site. I'll bet you someone on this site knows who scored the very first TD in UT history.
 
#45
#45
The plays that can be reviewed are NOT always reviewed. It's only if it has a direct effect on the outcome of the game. (or something to that effect). Whatever the replay policy is . . . they blew the call royally.
 
#47
#47
...and to think it only took him until the 11th game of a 5-6 season to prove you right.
 
#48
#48
Originally posted by GAVol@Nov 26, 2005 4:23 PM
The plays that can be reviewed are NOT always reviewed.  It's only if it has a direct effect on the outcome of the game. (or something to that effect).  Whatever the replay policy is . . . they blew the call royally.
[snapback]202838[/snapback]​
Click to expand...



I have better things to do than argue with you!!! if you dont believe me then read it your self!!!!! go here http://www.secsports.com/doc_lib/fbc_replay_policy.pdf

go to the right side were it read the process and read that go all the way down to the bold black letters and read!!!!!!!!!
 
#49
#49
I'm not exactly sure what you think I'm arguing with you about. I just think they may have blown the call on the safety. :dunno:
 
#50
#50
Originally posted by Jmxvol@Nov 26, 2005 2:06 PM
If that's what makes you happy, but I want greatness.
[snapback]202607[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

I know somebody with some great sheep for sale if you're interested.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top