tmodaniel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2005
- Messages
- 1,933
- Likes
- 4
I am saying that the players lost hope after being down by 21 points, they gave up on the game.My comment has nothing to do with giving up on Dooley at all, maybe if taking out of context. It wasn't just our O-line the whole damn team was tired and knew the game was over.
It comes down to what the coach (which I am not) believes to be the best opportunity cost for the team and for the players. Do the benefits out weigh the risk?
And if a team doesn't play whistle to whistle then I definitely put that on the staff.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
That's fine you can put that on the staff, that is your opinion and I respect that, however, look back at games were a team is getting it's ass handed to them and are losing by 21+ points, the team loses it's swagger and players give up on the game. Does that mean fire all the coaches and all of the staff on teams that have given up?
Ainge basically said he thought the staff took all the credit when Worley was successful against MTSU and let Worley shoulder all the blame when the offense struggled versus USC and Arkansas. Ainge has been relatively pro-Dooley to this point, but he is starting to take issue with Dooley throwing players under the bus. I think we have a lot of dissension in the ranks, but I'm hoping a couple of wins calm the waters. We need the practice time, and we need to end the season on a high note. I think we can get it done. Bray may give us just enough to beat Vandy and Kentucky, God willing. Go Big Orange. Dooley is here for at least one more year. Hopefully he will make some staff changes and relax into a figure head role. He's good with the press. He seems like a good recruiter thus far. I believe he could possibly be successful if he would stay out of the way. I think he is tinkering with Chaney's offense similar to how Fulmer meddled with the Clawfence. I don't know. Just beat Vandy, and we can argue about it later.
Fulmer's biggest mistake was the Clawfense. He still would have had a job if it wasn't for Dave C. He made a terrible hire and it cost him his job.
Dooley should tinker with Chaney's Big 10 pass-first offense. So predictible!
Then why not pull all the starters and build for the future? Why risk injury to any starter?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
As it turns out, Worley's RS should have never been burned. Simms could have won the MTSU game and the others wouldn't have mattered. Hind sight is 20/20 though.
Exactly. But that makes to much sense for many on here to understand.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
1) this isn't his only redshirt year
2) http://www.volnation.com/forum/tennessee-vols-football/145840-worely-concussed.html
the same can be said for dooleyThis is SEC football, if you do bad, you get pulled. If it bothers Worley that much, then he doesn't have what it takes to play in the SEC. Once your a starter, your fair game to every reporter, fan, player, and everyone else. If he can't handle getting benched for performing bad, then he cant handle the SEC. Thats all there is to it.
No player should get special treatment, Coleman got pulled for doing bad this year, just because he is a qb, doesn't mean he deserves different treatment.