gasguy98
Ih8themaroonwave
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Messages
- 2,826
- Likes
- 801
I realize that recruiting is the lifeblood of good teams but something doesn't add up.
Take Virginia Tech. I never recall seeing them have top 5 or top 10 classes but they have been consistantly good for 17 years now.
The majority of their players come from Virginia. They tend to be local guys.
We all know that Fulmer decided to recruit kids he could be a father fiqure to instead of how good a player they were but generally speaking the classes were at least top 20 (I know we had the class a few years ago that was like 34 but that was just one class).
I guess I am asking what the "intangibles" are that makes VT so good and us so pitiful.
Are the class rankings just BS?
Are they not properly motivated? Only interested in the NFL?
There has got to be something more than just recruiting that is the reason we stink now.
Thoughts?
Take Virginia Tech. I never recall seeing them have top 5 or top 10 classes but they have been consistantly good for 17 years now.
The majority of their players come from Virginia. They tend to be local guys.
We all know that Fulmer decided to recruit kids he could be a father fiqure to instead of how good a player they were but generally speaking the classes were at least top 20 (I know we had the class a few years ago that was like 34 but that was just one class).
I guess I am asking what the "intangibles" are that makes VT so good and us so pitiful.
Are the class rankings just BS?
Are they not properly motivated? Only interested in the NFL?
There has got to be something more than just recruiting that is the reason we stink now.
Thoughts?