A New Recruiting Site

#4
#4
Did you see that 5 star beside the Big Orange, like that site, Home signing day loves TENNESSEE, nice number 3 feels real good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5
#5
TkJ is in the mid 300s on this site? To top that he's still a four star too?
 
#7
#7
That site is garbage.

It could potentially grow. 247 was garbage at one point and now it's my favorite site as it updates frequently and has composite rankings...
 
#10
#10
lovavol said:
Don't go there, its that easy man
Click to expand...

Love it man recruiting junkie need a fix, the more the better, started shaking when i saw that 3 beside our name and fell out in the floor shaking when i saw that 5 beside Jalen name, find more man dig im a hurting.:eek:lol:
 
#11
#11
UTCVol said:
They separated the players by star rating but it's in alphabetical order.
Click to expand...

How do you judge one 4 star player from the other then? Plus, it doesn't show anything when you click on TN other then the players name, not even their star rating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#12
#12
They got us with two 5* three 4* and one 3*...so not so bad smelling trash..
I will be ever vigilant to keep them in line...no thanks needed...yes I know I'm a great man...no please stop...praise embarrasses me
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#17
#17
butchna said:
They got us with two 5* three 4* and one 3*...so not so bad smelling trash..
I will be ever vigilant to keep them in line...no thanks needed...yes I know I'm a great man...no please stop...praise embarrasses me
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

My bad..one5* four 4* and one 3*...cancel superstar tour
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#19
#19
Kinda wish one of the sites would introduce a different system, like perhaps adding a sixth star or actually using one and two stars to rate players. I'd like to see a little of both. Add a sixth star for the truly elite, top 1 or 2 percent. 247 has sorta done this already with rating players over 100. Then, spread the 3s and 4s out some. Haven't followed recruiting near to the level that many have on here, but aren't about 75% of all FBS recruits either 3 or 4 stars? And for the power conference teams, it's WAY more than that, I think. Just seems like something should be done or could be done to show a little more disparity among these athletes.
 
#21
#21
onefesternation said:
Kinda wish one of the sites would introduce a different system, like perhaps adding a sixth star or actually using one and two stars to rate players. I'd like to see a little of both. Add a sixth star for the truly elite, top 1 or 2 percent. 247 has sorta done this already with rating players over 100. Then, spread the 3s and 4s out some. Haven't followed recruiting near to the level that many have on here, but aren't about 75% of all FBS recruits either 3 or 4 stars? And for the power conference teams, it's WAY more than that, I think. Just seems like something should be done or could be done to show a little more disparity among these athletes.
Click to expand...


I don't disagree in principle, but the 5-star cohort of recruits is already an extremely small group. Out of Rivals' Top 250 nationally for this past recruiting season, only 33 (13.2%) were awarded that coveted 5th star (see Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com Ranking - Rivals.com Rivals250 2013). When you add in all of the 4-star prospects that did not make that list, not to mention the much larger group of 3-star prospects, you are probably approaching the 2-5 percentile range.
 
#23
#23
Volosaurus rex said:
I don't disagree in principle, but the 5-star cohort of recruits is already an extremely small group. Out of Rivals' Top 250 nationally for this past recruiting season, only 33 (13.2%) were awarded that coveted 5th star (see Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com Ranking - Rivals.com Rivals250 2013). When you add in all of the 4-star prospects that did not make that list, not to mention the much larger group of 3-star prospects, you are probably approaching the 2-5 percentile range.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I don't know the best way to go about it. Wish I did for monetary purposes ha. Just seems so odd to see a player one spot away from getting that coveted 5th star, thus being a 6.0 (Rivals) and now appear as only one star better than a 5.5 rated guy. This is why most of us choose not to be star gazers, but it can make a big difference in class rankings, which is what most go by to determine the success of their class. All 5 stars being rated 6.1 on Rivals has never made sense to me either.
 
#24
#24
onefesternation said:
Yeah, I don't know the best way to go about it. Wish I did for monetary purposes ha. Just seems so odd to see a player one spot away from getting that coveted 5th star, thus being a 6.0 (Rivals) and now appear as only one star better than a 5.5 rated guy. This is why most of us choose not to be star gazers, but it can make a big difference in class rankings, which is what most go by to determine the success of their class. All 5 stars being rated 6.1 on Rivals has never made sense to me either.
Click to expand...

The Rivals decimal system makes no sense.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top