OK, I've been reading up a little on the Florida stand your ground law. Sounds like a license to murder to me.
IMO, Trayvon was the one in defensive mode that night three weeks ago. Unfortunately, he is the one being postured as guilty until proven innocent while his killer enjoys the innocent until proven guilty setting. If no charges are brought, I'm sure Zimmerman is aware that he could fall victim to this same bs law himself.
He was completely wrong to approach the youngster.
LG, are you defending the shooter, or just defending the process of the investigation?
If I'm neiborhood watch & see somebody suspicious in the neiborhood I probably would at least see what was going on. Wasn't it a gated community on a rainy night? Was he taking a shortcut or something? Not saying the guy was totally right but I could see an over zealous kid making it a difficult situation.
Had it been the other way around it would be 24/7 on every TV station in the US. I am sure that there will be a big story on what the boy did to provoke the attack. The attackers will get a slap on the wrist.
IMO, Trayvon was the one in defensive mode that night three weeks ago. Unfortunately, he is the one being postured as guilty until proven innocent while his killer enjoys the innocent until proven guilty setting. If no charges are brought, I'm sure Zimmerman is aware that he could fall victim to this same bs law himself.
The kid apparently lived in the community.
I am sure folks like Superdave feels the boy had it coming, and got off lightly. Even worse, is since the shooter was white he will get a really unfair trial. Historically the justice system has always punished whites more than blacks.
Or, they want to drop the hot potato in another lap. I don't know either, LG. Maybe, the police should not have waited three weeks to release information that they probably had/should have had on the night Trayvon was killed.
The process of the investigation in context of the law and what few facts regarding the confrontation we actually know.
Zimmerman seems like a complete tool, a zealous wacko. But that doesn't mean that he's guilty of a crime here. We need to let the investigation reach some conclusions, then review the facts.
very true. The media always grabs whatever will play on emotions and run with it no matter the facts, laws, or processes.
I've been pretty clear in how I feel about someone who isn't LEO initiating an armed confrontation, especially one with no particularly articulable threat to confront. Having said that you're dead right on this...emotions and sweeping assumptions based on little evidence is a common thing these days. Anybody remember how very different the Duke Lacrosse ended than how it began once the truth started to come out?
I,too, think that if Zimmerman got out of his car to follow the young man for no reason other than he was black should be considered. But it has to be considered in the entire scheme of the situation. According to the 911 tape Zimmerman says it was raining and the kid was just standing there, looking at houses. Also, according to the tape, Zimmerman says the kid is staring at him and starting to come over to him to confront Zimmerman.
It is after that when Zimmerman says he is following the kid and is told "we don't need you to do that" and Zimmerman says "o.k."
We don't know how the kid was acting towards Zimmerman. We don't know what words were exchanged. Some witnesses reported seeing a physical struggle going on. And we know Zimmerman was bleeding from the back of his head and from his nose when police arrived.
Did Zimmerman act in such a manner as to create the confrontation? Maybe so. I don't know. Did the kid act in some aggressive manner that contributed to the confrontation and ensuing use of the gun? Maybe so. I don't know. Was there a fight and was Zimmerman legitimately in fear for his life? Maybe so. I don't know. Or did Zimmerman shoot the kid simply because he was black? Maybe so. I don't know.
The police have announced that they will do a voice analysis to determine who is on the tape yelling for help. If it is Zimmerman yelling for help, and if Zimmerman is found bleeding, and if witnesses say that there was a physical struggle going on, you are left with that versus Zimmerman being a bit of a kook and into being a cop plus "we don't need you to do that." I'm just not sure that's enough to say a crime was committed, much less that a conviction is reasonably possible here.
Yes we do, he got out of the car to chase the kid.
I,too, think that if Zimmerman got out of his car to follow the young man for no reason other than he was black should be considered. But it has to be considered in the entire scheme of the situation. According to the 911 tape Zimmerman says it was raining and the kid was just standing there, looking at houses. Also, according to the tape, Zimmerman says the kid is staring at him and starting to come over to him to confront Zimmerman.
It is after that when Zimmerman says he is following the kid and is told "we don't need you to do that" and Zimmerman says "o.k."
We don't know how the kid was acting towards Zimmerman. We don't know what words were exchanged. Some witnesses reported seeing a physical struggle going on. And we know Zimmerman was bleeding from the back of his head and from his nose when police arrived.
Did Zimmerman act in such a manner as to create the confrontation? Maybe so. I don't know. Did the kid act in some aggressive manner that contributed to the confrontation and ensuing use of the gun? Maybe so. I don't know. Was there a fight and was Zimmerman legitimately in fear for his life? Maybe so. I don't know. Or did Zimmerman shoot the kid simply because he was black? Maybe so. I don't know.
The police have announced that they will do a voice analysis to determine who is on the tape yelling for help. If it is Zimmerman yelling for help, and if Zimmerman is found bleeding, and if witnesses say that there was a physical struggle going on, you are left with that versus Zimmerman being a bit of a kook and into being a cop plus "we don't need you to do that." I'm just not sure that's enough to say a crime was committed, much less that a conviction is reasonably possible here.
After, he said, the kid was staring at him and walking towards him.
I'm not saying he was right to continue after him after the dispatcher said "We don't need you to do that," but its hardly the same thing as "he got out of the car to chase the kid" or "after being told not to."
It depends in large part on what Zimmerman says and what the physical evidence shows. For example, if he ran after the kid for 200 yards, winding behind houses, cornered him and threatened him, I'd be more inclined to find criminal fault. But if he walked after him for 30 yards, between two houses, and the kid freaked out and came at him and punched him and had him on the ground, as has been reported by some, I'd be less inclined to find fault.
Depends on the physical evidence, which we don't know at this point and which is part of the ongoing investigation.
.
The most recent news is that the state attorney is going to convene a grand jury, the DOJ is going to conduct its own, independent investigation to determine if any federal crime was committed, and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement is going to conduct its own review, as well.
Trayvon Martin department of justice hate crime: Department of Justice to investigate Trayvon Martin shooting - Orlando Sentinel
What I think needs to happen now is that responsible leaders from the black community need to stop simply calling for the Zimmerman's arrest just because they think he might have done something wrong, let this process work itself out, and see where things are then. If there is an indictment, either by the grand jury or the DOJ, then they will have gotten what they want. If not, all of the investigative materials will be released and the issues fairly debated.
But it does no good, based purely on guesswork and speculation at this stage, to call for Zimmerman simply to be arrested and charged.