You'd think so, but the recruiting says otherwise. If it's the investigation, it'll never pick up because it'll probably be years before the NCAA gets their fingers out of their asses
I'm not in love with the recruiting at the moment - who would be - but I think that it's a tough spot for them to be in for several reasons.
1. The investigation is absolutely being used against them on the trail. Now that the internal investigation is over, and no self-imposed bowl ban has been handed down, they can at least partially ease parents' minds that they aren't facing the Sword of Damocles from the NCAA.
2. The school has been self-imposing recruiting restrictions. For instance, no official visitors for the Pitt game. This has been quiet, but has definitely occurred already.
3. The staff was always going to have to sell their production on the field, and during the season they have not been able to actually go in-home with recruits. The early signing period hurts us in this class in that regard, because while the results on the field have been good, they haven't been able to fully capitalize off of them due to the season keeping them in Knoxville to coach the team.
4. They just don't have longstanding relationships with the kids they are recruiting. Aside from Garner, virtually none (and maybe actually none) of these coaches were recruiting kids in the SEC footprint - or at least not the same caliber of kids. So, they are behind the eight ball from a relationship standpoint, and recruiting is the relationship business.
All told, I think we will see dividends in the 2023 and 2024 classes that are a by-product of this year's on-field success, but there may not be enough time to make significant headway before early signing day. It sucks, but the portal and the JUCO ranks may just have to be our friend for a year. We have had good success there with Tiyon, Javonta, and Tremblay (to an extent), as well as McGrath to lesser degree. We just have to find the stop gaps while also building relationships with underclassmen.