Nice job of evaluating talent by Haystacks. The fact that the junior and senior classes are almost total washouts reflects very well on his work.
ha, ha, ha..........not that any of that is untrue, but honestly, looking at the current personnel, who we lost etc, etc, etc, and the experience level of this team the past two years, should we really expect a whole lot more than what we got last year from this year's team?Yeah, "Wait 'til next year." Never heard that before
Why would I assume that '07, '08, or '09 will be any different from the preceding years? The Munoz class had the same credentials as the last two recruiting classes, how did they turn out?ha, ha, ha..........not that any of that is untrue, but honestly, looking at the current personnel, who we lost etc, etc, etc, and the experience level of this team the past two years, should we really expect a whole lot more than what we got last year from this year's team?
for me, not so much.......i've been saying for quite a while that 07 would probably be a lot like 06......and that our next real chance to make a SERIOUS title run of any kind would likely be 08 and 09........the age and experience level of the current team are part of the reason, the current, stress current, talent level on this team is part of it, and then you compare that to getting who's here, better and more experienced, with brining in a recruiting class like the one we got this year....it sets up for it then......
i'll say this.....in 08 and 09, Talent level should NOT be the reason we don't win a title, conf. or otherwise.
i dunno.......i'm not assuming either, just saying that it would be our next best chance given the current personnel stuff i've already talked about.Why would I assume that '07, '08, or '09 will be any different from the preceding years? The Munoz class had the same credentials as the last two recruiting classes, how did they turn out?
as has been stated in other threads, it's no secret that it is much harder today than it probably ever has been to win the SEC given the overall talent level of our competition.Grrrrrrrreat, so we need to wait until 2008 or 2009 when Florida's BETTER recruiting classes get better, too. And 2008 or 2009 when Nick Saban has 3 classes under his belt. GRRRRRRREAT. Or 2008 or 2009 when Matt Stafford will be a JR and SR.
Being a Vol football fan is becoming like being a Cubs fan.
all correct, except, i guess it depends on where you view our current talent level, depth and experience level for 07 as to how good our shot at the SEC is in 07. for me, i still don't think we have the horses to compete wtih an LSU or FL in 07, so that removes coaching from the equation for me, at least for a season.See, here's the situation:
Our talent will be as good as Florida's and Georgia's, so it comes down to coaching - Fulmer is what, 2-6 against those two coaches?
I've said it before, 2007 will be our best chance to win the SEC over the next 3 seasons. Sure, we'll have a chance in 2008 and 2009, but our BEST chance is 2007.
And after I say that, some people pretty much say that we won't win it in 2007, so what does that say about 2008 and 2009? I mean, Florida's classes have been better than ours. The only way Florida doesn't win an SEC title in 2008 or 2009 is if Meyer's 100% spread option bombs. If it's good, we're in deep doo-doo.
One positive thing that I can say is that when Tennessee started to descend, it was with Randy Sanders at the offensive coordinator position. There were obvious improvements on the field when Cutcliffe came back, and not just from 2005. We looked more organized in 2006 than any other season this decade. Mayyyyyybe Cutcliffe can take the equal talent we have and create an offense that will lead us to an SEC title in 2008 or 2009. Will he be here?
Well, then that explains a lot right there....that's where i would disagree with you....i don't think our talent level, across the board, is where FL or LSU are right now.See, I think our current talent level is just fine. Our 2004, 2005, and 2007 classes are all top notch, and our 2006 class had some good players in it. You can't name one area on the team that is far far below our competition in raw talent.
And as for the 3 legitimate SECE contenders in 2007, Tennessee has the most experience.
I just heard this morning that 60 of UT's current 85 scholarship players are either freshmen or sophomores. I hadn't thought about it, but this is a really young team - again.