6 Wisc @ 16 Mich St

#51
#51
He was in, but it was veeerrry close. Amazing play and amazing game. Sparty pulls it out in the end. No national championship for Wisconsin.
 
#64
#64
Hell no it wasn't that far over. An inch maybe.

The camera angle can change the look of the play.
It seemed like the camera was on the 10 yard line which made the ball look closer to the goal line. They need to have a camera on the ground at the goal line for this kind of play.
 
#67
#67
I don't think it should have been overturned..there's no way there was enough evidence to overturn the call on the field..
 
#68
#68
I don't think it should have been overturned..there's no way there was enough evidence to overturn the call on the field..

I thought it was probably a touchdown. But you're right--the replay didn't really meet the "indisputable" evidence standard to overturn the call on the field.
 
#69
#69
yea, I just think the ruling on the field should have stood, and let them play it out in OT
 
#71
#71
However, imagine the downfall if the game goes to overtime and Wisconsin wins even though MSU really won it in regulation.
 
#73
#73
That was a helluva game - great comeback by Wiscy then the dagger. Thought the post game celebration was what college football is all about - it was awesome.
 
#75
#75
I don't think it should have been overturned..there's no way there was enough evidence to overturn the call on the field..

Then you need to scrap the instant replay completely. The picture, and the video all show the ball crossing the plane of the goal line. If it is good enough to make the call at other times of the game, then you should be able to use it on the last play of the game.

Touchdown MSU.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top