Presently Alabama has on their roster 19 five star players and Tennessee has six and that is going back to 2013. Coming up For 2017 class Alabama has five and Tennessee has none. How is that catching up? I remember CBJ said they know the type athletic they look for. I remember he took E. Mosley and he only weighted only 145# but he said we will get him in the weight room and build him up. Well Butch how did that work out? He cannot recruit on the level with Sabin but many other coaches have the same problem. If his assistance could do a little better. Just think the year was suppose to be a rebuilding year for Alabama. Of course cutcliff at Duke does very well with two star players and so does Louisville. There just a few coaches around the country that can take less talent and complete with big time programs. It also seems coaches that has a snare on their face , do a better job. Sabin hardly ever smiles, Belick, Ditta, Myers, many many other big time coaches. What happened to "Power of Positive Thinking" I guess in football it doesn't work.
One list shows AL with 5 5*, OH St with 6, and Clemson with 2 - nobody else has more than one and most have none. Another shows AL with 4, OH St with 6, a handful with 1, and most with 0. I'd say UT is keeping up with AL just about as well as anybody else in the country except OSU.
A little comparison. If your house was damaged in a storm, your first priority (for the house) would be to prevent further damage and make it at least habitable. First priority if you take over a depleted football team is find enough players to start and minimize losses - critical for a coach wanting to keep a job. The second thing would be to keep ahead of things - keep the patches working as you make more permanent fixes - like better starters in the next year or so. Next you start trying to do something about keeping a decent first team because of known attrition - graduation, injuries, players who leave - NFL, personal reasons, etc. Finally you try for depth while keeping up with attrition. A coach who knew he didn't have to win immediately to keep his job, might prioritize differently and build a stronger team more efficiently - but with a poorer initial record - if he kept his job.
AL is there on depth - it's a strength, and some teams probably keep up but could never match AL if they have to dig deep - 3rd - 4th level. Fixer upper teams many times starting with coaching turnover will struggle with depth even at a secondary level. With recruiting restrictions a fixer upper coach can only do so much about depth while filling immediate needs. A coach in Butch's position can only hope starters stay healthy because there's not much depth yet to work with.
Imagine trying to run a company when employees could leave any time; but you could only fill positions once a year; and regardless of how many left, you could only add so many people at that one hiring period. Oh yeah, everybody else is trying to add top quality people at the same time, and they are poaching new hires you have lined up. Then once you hire them you can only train them at certain times and on a limited schedule. Easy, huh?