bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 76,971
- Likes
- 62,882
@TrippieRedd how do you feel about Ebuka Okorie from Stanford if he were to enter the portal?
Yeah he’s the PG. Tanner would probably fit our system a little better, but no way I’m taking Foxwell over him. I love Foxwell, but the guy averaged almost 25 a night. Had 40 against UNC, had 34 last night.Is that the PG from Stanford?
I’m making Tanner tell me no and I’d be curious to see who the other targets are at PG.
I’d take Foxwell over him as well.
This is a quick transcription of morning conversation. I’m not representing personal projections or analyzing likelihoods. Just sharing before I head into some meetings:
As of this morning every player has an understanding of role and their starting NIL number. Literally every non-walk-on has been given an overview of their role and an offer. It’s an opening move in a chess game. Offers convey priorities. April 7-15 will see substantial activity based on players not known to the public as portal entries currently. The predictions are that there will be better g movement and some great players available. Staff likes our guard lineup to bottom more than I would’ve expected. Current players with more sophisticated representation will probably make decisions more quickly than players riding the train. A game changer at 4/5 another scorer at 2/3 and an experienced pg are all in the consideration set since who leaves stays can change.
Yeah he’s the PG. Tanner would probably fit our system a little better, but no way I’m taking Foxwell over him. I love Foxwell, but the guy averaged almost 25 a night. Had 40 against UNC, had 34 last night.
That’s fair. I agree having a multi-year guy would be ideal.I still think he’s a really good player. Definitely think he has a solid chance at being a lottery pick next year.
He reminds me a lot of Damian Lillard.
My only preference for Foxwell is that he will be a multi year guy, where as with Okorie, you may just get one season.
Burg and Henderson need to go honestly. Not even close to enough scoring if those 4 all returnReading tea leaves, maybe staff would like to keep all of Bishop, Evans, Burg, and Henderson on roster. Obviously team needs a starting PG still, but don't know if that bodes well for bringing in another star guard like a Rice. Obviously actual transfers change everything.
guards on roster. they'll augment, but there is some growing enthusiasm around development over the season.
Probably means staff likes Burg and Massamba as being dependable back ups. Losing Ament and Gillespie leave huge glaring offensive needs that neither Evans nor Boswell would be expected to make that type of massive offensive jump.Oof. I mean I like Evans’ potential but if we don’t bring in 2-3 studs, it’s a swing and a miss, IMO. I do not want to go into next year needing Boswell and Evans to average 10-12 PPG for us to make a Final Four.
Yea, I won’t fall into that trap…those are good players and can play a role, but the bulk of what’s here are guys that would/should be 5-9 on a good team, we still need 1-4 to be a serious contender.Oof. I mean I like Evans’ potential but if we don’t bring in 2-3 studs, it’s a swing and a miss, IMO. I do not want to go into next year needing Boswell and Evans to average 10-12 PPG for us to make a Final Four.
