Seems unlikely this wave of top 15 visitors all fit based on skills. She may learn more about attitude, etc on a visit. But I doubt they are this far along trying to assess if the skills fit.
If you have time, can you explain more about what you mean about assessing
if the skills fit?
I think I must be reading that differently from how you mean it. I'd think they know almost everything about each player they invite before they even invite, and when they arrive, the only thing left to discover is how they will respond to the current team members and the support staff (academic, strength & conditioning, nutrition, etc.).
My guess is that the first question on the recruiting staff's flowchart is, "Does she like to play fast?" because some players do prefer--just from personality, attitude, or mental process--to walk the ball down the court and work the halfcourt game to generate a winning advantage for their team. If a girl
from an early age isn't pushing the ball, trying to create opportunities in transition, looking for teammates doing the same... I'd guess they're automatically off CKC's list.
I feel sure our staff is following girls from 8th grade who already show the athleticism and possibly the size, or simply the love of the game and drive to get better. Then they start tracking their progress in developing ball skills, setting up shots, extending their shooting range, etc. If the rules allow, I'd bet they even suggest (to parents or school coach) which club teams/coaches would most benefit the player.
Once the staff is legally able to have personal contact (I'm not up on all that stuff), I think they begin to establish a "coaching" relationship with them, advising each player on what skills they need to develop next, suggesting moves to work on, pointing out weaknesses in their game, so that they become the player Tennessee hopes to recruit by the time they finish high school.

But maybe I'm full o' hooey on all that. It's just my impression.