2025/26 Transfer Portal Thread

I need to apologize to @Jackcrevol and @Weezer. I just listened to the VQ podcast. Both of you have been screaming about DTs and I have said we would be fine and there is no need to worry. I was wrong and look dumb now. AP said we don’t get enough DTs or CBs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volfan_1999
LB is much improved given Telander is now 3rd string and I’d say Edge is also improved with the additions and the upgrade in coaching. Chop was not a good coach and that group suffered.

Everyone will have to trust RG on DL. I certainly don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion they’re worse because they weren’t very good last year. They won’t have the rotation they did in 24, but there’s plenty of talent there.
Kind off-topic from your post: I like the idea of having Knowles coach from the sidelines. He's coached from the press-box before. Makes me wonder if that was part of the deal in coming here, coach from the field.

I wanted to drop-kick Tim Banks every time they showed him in the press-box after our defense just get embarrassed all game long.

*also. . . we may have some studs on defense, but didnt know it because of scheme/coaching. I mean, look at Jakobe Thomas. He looked like a different player at Miami.
 
I need to apologize to @Jackcrevol and @Weezer. I just listened to the VQ podcast. Both of you have been screaming about DTs and I have said we would be fine and there is no need to worry. I was wrong and look dumb now. AP said we don’t get enough DTs or CBs.
AP says anything that gets people to pay attention to him, and from my experience working in media positivity almost never drives traffic like negativity does. I'm not saying Tennessee does or doesn't have what it needs at any position. None of us know, Price and the VQ crew included. No one will even have a true inkling for two to two and a half months when spring practice begins, but they can't wait until then for traffic to the podcast to spike. Gotta keep that momentum going.

I do not and will not listen to sports talk radio or podcasts. Life is too short to willingly consume BS. I know the game because I did my time playing it.
 
Fans are quick to forget that RG knows what he’s doing. First year with us after Pruitt, 60th in run defense. 2022-2024 we were top 20 or better. Last year we should have gone after more DT in the portal and it’s known that Banks didn’t prioritize that which resulted in poor performance. No reason to think that between RG and Knowles, they just forgot how to do their jobs.
But....we only added 1 DT in the portal this year.
 
Those same people will criticize the staff for not playing and developing those recruits, then say we can't go into a season relying on them because they are not ready and something about 6-6.
Respectfully, that's a straw man argument. This is strictly about the DL, where we simply don't have enough bodies and at the same time it's a position where playing young guys is rarely if ever a recipe for success. That doesn't mean I think Campbell/Utley/House and the 10 true freshmen suck; quite the contrary, I think we've got some outstanding young DL prospects in the pipeline. But in the portal era there's just no reason to have the bulk of your DL be young (and light, but that's a different story). It's completely avoidable and yet other than Gilliam (huge pickup!) we seem to have decided that once we missed on our next few targets we just were going to stop trying. And ultimately that's likely to bite us in the butt come next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JT3 and Ttucke11
I need to apologize to @Jackcrevol and @Weezer. I just listened to the VQ podcast. Both of you have been screaming about DTs and I have said we would be fine and there is no need to worry. I was wrong and look dumb now. AP said we don’t get enough DTs or CBs.
He obviously reads VN and knows Yeti wisdom is damn near infallible. I am AP's source.
 
AP says anything that gets people to pay attention to him, and from my experience working in media positivity almost never drives traffic like negativity does. I'm not saying Tennessee does or doesn't have what it needs at any position. None of us know, Price and the VQ crew included. No one will even have a true inkling for two to two and a half months when spring practice begins, but they can't wait until then for traffic to the podcast to spike. Gotta keep that momentum going.

I do not and will not listen to sports talk radio or podcasts. Life is too short to willingly consume BS. I know the game because I did my time playing it.
It seems silly but this is why I only consume film study related channels on YouTube, who are actually focusing on what is happening on the field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LoudOrange
Returning/Portal
- Hobbs - 6’3” 290
- Gilliam - 6’2” 302
- Campbell - 6’4” 295
- Robinson - 6’6” 300
- Utley - 6’4” 285
- House - 6’3” 295

Incoming freshman
- Albert - 6’1” 305 (not going to be here until the summer)
- Rivers - 6’5” 273
- Finch - 6’2” 292
- Simmons - 6’3” 320

We currently have 10 DT’s on the roster (we may have a couple walk-ons, but I wouldn’t count them). You expect those guys in the first group to take a step forward, especially with Owings.

IMO, if you can get 2 of those incoming freshman guys to step up and give you 10 or so snaps a game, I don’t see all the reason for a freak out.
 
Respectfully, that's a straw man argument. This is strictly about the DL, where we simply don't have enough bodies and at the same time it's a position where playing young guys is rarely if ever a recipe for success. That doesn't mean I think Campbell/Utley/House and the 10 true freshmen suck; quite the contrary, I think we've got some outstanding young DL prospects in the pipeline. But in the portal era there's just no reason to have the bulk of your DL be young (and light, but that's a different story). It's completely avoidable and yet other than Gilliam (huge pickup!) we seem to have decided that once we missed on our next few targets we just were going to stop trying. And ultimately that's likely to bite us in the butt come next season.
Light you can address, and youth/experience is impossible to fix from the bench. I'd argue part of what happened to us last year is about leaning too heavily on the veterans with the COVID exemptions extending playing careers. We simply weren't getting young guys enough run, so they were as untested as they were young. Add in that this portal cycle was light on quality at DT, and this was arguably inevitable.

Tennessee essentially had three choices: wait and hope more guys that fit what they wanted hit the portal and that they can get them on campus and committed, take more than one of the guys they did get on campus even if they were a bit smaller, or don't waste time with guys who run the risk of being bench warmers. What good did adding Josh Schell end up doing for the Vols last year?

Ultimately, I do think they should have taken Brewu or Mathis if they were prepared to commit rather than waiting and hoping for someone heavier to come along, but there was no guarantee Mathis would pan out either, and they could have easily still ended up having to go young because, despite fans acting like they can, Tennessee isn't allowed to force anyone to play for them. A small amount of bait in a shark tank is going to lead to fighting and some people going hungry. Tennessee did well to get anyone capable of contributing this cycle because things dropped off pretty precipitously past the top 15-20 defensive tackles.
 
I need to apologize to @Jackcrevol and @Weezer. I just listened to the VQ podcast. Both of you have been screaming about DTs and I have said we would be fine and there is no need to worry. I was wrong and look dumb now. AP said we don’t get enough DTs or CBs.
At worst, Heupel needs to bring at least one dude at DT that has some more snaps than some of our younger DTs. That would make me feel better about the depth in that unit.
 
I need to apologize to @Jackcrevol and @Weezer. I just listened to the VQ podcast. Both of you have been screaming about DTs and I have said we would be fine and there is no need to worry. I was wrong and look dumb now. AP said we don’t get enough DTs or CBs.

You base your opinion off AP’s opinion?

He knows as much about running a football program and building a roster as you do.
 
AP says anything that gets people to pay attention to him, and from my experience working in media positivity almost never drives traffic like negativity does. I'm not saying Tennessee does or doesn't have what it needs at any position. None of us know, Price and the VQ crew included. No one will even have a true inkling for two to two and a half months when spring practice begins, but they can't wait until then for traffic to the podcast to spike. Gotta keep that momentum going.

I do not and will not listen to sports talk radio or podcasts. Life is too short to willingly consume BS. I know the game because I did my time playing it.
Yeah, I continue to be confused by people paying attention to these guys, especially their opinions. Then they constantly criticize them.
 
He’s been so off, which is kind of annoying considering i used to like listening to the VQ podcasts.
The selling of VQ changed how they behave, what access they have, and generally how useless they’ve become. They have to be nice dogs til the earnout is done. It’s just an advertising platform with repetitive blather in between. They spend all their energy trying to extend a single point into ten minutes to fill the segments between the two minute commercials. The AD has basically frozen them out over some big gaffes in their judgment. You can hear that in their pissy comments. At this point there is zero real reporting from any beat reporter, podcaster etc. It’s all hot air.
 
We currently have 10 DT’s on the roster (we may have a couple walk-ons, but I wouldn’t count them). You expect those guys in the first group to take a step forward, especially with Owings.

IMO, if you can get 2 of those incoming freshman guys to step up and give you 10 or so snaps a game, I don’t see all the reason for a freak out.

Maybe freak out is not warranted, but concerned is. That list of DT's is short on experience and small in stature. DT's tire out quick and need constant rotation. A couple of injuries and we're cooked. Lastly, it would be nice to see a couple guys in the 310-325# range for short yardage sneak plays. A bunch of worn out 290# guys are going to get pushed around. Even one more DT with some playing time would be gold!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jvols1999
Returning/Portal
- Hobbs - 6’3” 290
- Gilliam - 6’2” 302
- Campbell - 6’4” 295
- Robinson - 6’6” 300
- Utley - 6’4” 285
- House - 6’3” 295

Incoming freshman
- Albert - 6’1” 305 (not going to be here until the summer)
- Rivers - 6’5” 273
- Finch - 6’2” 292
- Simmons - 6’3” 320

We currently have 10 DT’s on the roster (we may have a couple walk-ons, but I wouldn’t count them). You expect those guys in the first group to take a step forward, especially with Owings.

IMO, if you can get 2 of those incoming freshman guys to step up and give you 10 or so snaps a game, I don’t see all the reason for a freak out.
We are fine at DT. We will be bigger and stronger. We can go 3 deep with all 6 over 300 by fall, which is the magic number someone evidently created to not get shoved around.
I liked Eason and West, but fact is our DTs looked awful last year. They are gone. I don’t know what part is on them, or scheme or disconnect with Garner or all of the above, but I don’t understand being worried about what we lost at DT.
Banks has also been known to play inferior players over better players based on tenure so let’s see what we got. Should be a good battle for top 4. If people recall, it was stated Indiana only played 13 different defenders all season. We don’t need 14 of these dudes. We just need 4 who will be more violent and not get shoved around.
 
The selling of VQ changed how they behave, what access they have, and generally how useless they’ve become. They have to be nice dogs til the earnout is done. It’s just an advertising platform with repetitive blather in between. They spend all their energy trying to extend a single point into ten minutes to fill the segments between the two minute commercials. The AD has basically frozen them out over some big gaffes in their judgment. You can hear that in their pissy comments. At this point there is zero real reporting from any beat reporter, podcaster etc. It’s all hot air.
247 still gets decent access and aren't half as petty or pissy in their podcasts or coverage as VQ

Letting the VQ sub lapse is the easiest decision I've ever made
 
Maybe freak out is not warranted, but concerned is. That list of DT's is short on experience and small in stature. DT's tire out quick and need constant rotation. A couple of injuries and we're cooked. Lastly, it would be nice to see a couple guys in the 310-325# range for short yardage sneak plays. A bunch of worn out 290# guys are going to get pushed around. Even one more DT with some playing time would be gold!
It's pretty much a 100% guarantee that those guys will put on more weight between now and the season.

I've read in a couple of different places that Knowles system doesn't require 320+ plus guys
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangenSC
Returning/Portal
- Hobbs - 6’3” 290
- Gilliam - 6’2” 302
- Campbell - 6’4” 295
- Robinson - 6’6” 300
- Utley - 6’4” 285
- House - 6’3” 295

Incoming freshman
- Albert - 6’1” 305 (not going to be here until the summer)
- Rivers - 6’5” 273
- Finch - 6’2” 292
- Simmons - 6’3” 320

We currently have 10 DT’s on the roster (we may have a couple walk-ons, but I wouldn’t count them). You expect those guys in the first group to take a step forward, especially with Owings.

IMO, if you can get 2 of those incoming freshman guys to step up and give you 10 or so snaps a game, I don’t see all the reason for a freak out.
Forgot Gooden!
IMG_3327.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ratvol
247 still gets decent access and aren't half as petty or pissy in their podcasts or coverage as VQ

Letting the VQ sub lapse is the easiest decision I've ever made
Callahan might be the closest thing to a reporter who does the work, but the bar is absurdly low. No one has the patience do develop long stories over time, and none of them are willing to gamble access to break early information either. You’re stuck with editorial commentary, and none of them are smart enough to handle that. Rucker obviously has a higher IQ than Hubbs, but that’s like comparing your dog to a hammer. I don’t really want to listen to the opinions of either.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top