StepCross
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2010
- Messages
- 923
- Likes
- 237
Do we actually have a shot at both Igor and Tyson without running off Shack or another wing? Ramey alluded to it being either/or earlier, but definitely don’t trust him on this stuff.Didn’t see AP’s post shared above, basically my general thoughts…looking good for Igor & Okpara, and Tyson isn’t a UNC lock and is giving us a legitimate chance.
Do we actually have a shot at both Igor and Tyson without running off Shack or another wing? Ramey alluded to it being either/or earlier, but definitely don’t trust him on this stuff.
The staff went into this thinking it was one or the other just simply playing the odds, they set the visits the way they did for that reason. Now that Tyson has left UNC without committing and in is in dialogue with the staff and allowing a meeting to be set up they are fully prepared to take both players.Do we actually have a shot at both Igor and Tyson without running off Shack or another wing? Ramey alluded to it being either/or earlier, but definitely don’t trust him on this stuff.
We haven’t really been “in contact” with any other guys that play the 2, at least not publiclyThe staff went into this thinking it was one or the other just simply playing the odds, they set the visits the way they did for that reason. Now that Tyson has left UNC without committing and in is in dialogue with the staff and allowing a meeting to be set up they are fully prepared to take both players.
Maybe that means you don’t take Lanier later on, maybe it means someone leaves, maybe it means nothing, but imo you take the guys you like and ask questions later.
Fwiw I still think as of this moment the staff plans to pursue Lanier (assuming he enters the portal)…now if you land both does that change things? Maybe. As I said though, I’d still pursue him.We haven’t really been “in contact” with any other guys that play the 2, at least not publicly
I saw a poster earlier saying something about Lanier and Maryland. With the good news you posted, it all kind of goes together in a way.
If you land both Igor and Tyson. You’d have ZZ/Shack/Dubar/Igor/Okpara, with Cade being the 6th man that could still see 25+ minutes taking over for guys at the 2-3 or 2-4. Starters would still see normal minutes and everyone is happy. (Or whoever the 6th man is, could he Shack, Dubar or Tyson)
The staff went into this thinking it was one or the other just simply playing the odds, they set the visits the way they did for that reason. Now that Tyson has left UNC without committing and in is in dialogue with the staff and allowing a meeting to be set up they are fully prepared to take both players.
Maybe that means you don’t take Lanier later on, maybe it means someone leaves, maybe it means nothing, but imo you take the guys you like and ask questions later.
Fwiw I still think as of this moment the staff plans to pursue Lanier (assuming he enters the portal)…now if you land both does that change things? Maybe. As I said though, I’d still pursue him.
Honestly, I say load up on talent. If someone runs from competition, so be it. I look at it as the guys coming from the portal are running TO competition. I'll take those cats every single time.We haven’t really been “in contact” with any other guys that play the 2, at least not publicly
I saw a poster earlier saying something about Lanier and Maryland. With the good news you posted, it all kind of goes together in a way.
If you land both Igor and Tyson. You’d have ZZ/Shack/Dubar/Igor/Okpara, with Cade being the 6th man that could still see 25+ minutes taking over for guys at the 2-3 or 2-4. Starters would still see normal minutes and everyone is happy. (Or whoever the 6th man is, could be Shack, Dubar or Tyson).
I would take Tyson over Lanier. No offense to Lanier as he looks like a good player. Tyson has two years left and if we have depth anywhere it is at 2G. Mashack and ZZ can be the best defensive backcourt in the country.The staff went into this thinking it was one or the other just simply playing the odds, they set the visits the way they did for that reason. Now that Tyson has left UNC without committing and in is in dialogue with the staff and allowing a meeting to be set up they are fully prepared to take both players.
Maybe that means you don’t take Lanier later on, maybe it means someone leaves, maybe it means nothing, but imo you take the guys you like and ask questions later.
Add in mashack continuing to develop his 3 shot and we have ourselves another great teamI would take Tyson over Lanier. No offense to Lanier as he looks like a good player. Tyson has two years left and if we have depth anywhere it is at 2G. Mashack and ZZ can be the best defensive backcourt in the country.
Forward rotation of Tyson, Milicic and Dubar gives you at 2 perimeter shooters at the 3 and 4 at all times. At times they would be on the court together.
It's a new day. Lotta guys are gone. We got room. Take em bothI would take Tyson over Lanier. No offense to Lanier as he looks like a good player. Tyson has two years left and if we have depth anywhere it is at 2G. Mashack and ZZ can be the best defensive backcourt in the country.
Forward rotation of Tyson, Milicic and Dubar gives you at 2 perimeter shooters at the 3 and 4 at all times. At times they would be on the court together.
Fair, but Mashack is more than capable starting @ the 3 while ZZ & Lanier run the primary guard positions... Lanier is a proven shot creator and can help Zeigler the way Vescovi had done... Tyson can't provide us what Lanier can. And Gainey coming off the bench to relieve ZZ & Lanier. I could see that working out... I honestly hope we get Lanier personally he is much more of an overall go-to guy who fills Vescovis absence...I would take Tyson over Lanier. No offense to Lanier as he looks like a good player. Tyson has two years left and if we have depth anywhere it is at 2G. Mashack and ZZ can be the best defensive backcourt in the country.
Forward rotation of Tyson, Milicic and Dubar gives you at 2 perimeter shooters at the 3 and 4 at all times. At times they would be on the court together.