AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,653
- Likes
- 42,635
So it's a Catch 22. Powell doesn't have hard evidence because only the election commissions have the evidence. How can you prove what you aren't allowed to have. See how this works? There's the appearance of funny things happening - negative votes just don't happen, but they did, and without access you can't say the deletions were nefarious or proper. If you can keep the records closed, and that's what the election commissions do, then no one can get to the hard evidence to prove fraud or to accept things as correct. There's good reason for the old saying about not being able to fight city hall.