Franklin Pierce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2014
- Messages
- 28,445
- Likes
- 32,456
I believe you brought the what aboutism into the conversation. I, however, don't need to go there because the acts of molesting a child on video in front of the world speaks for itself. It's indefensible, it's very very publicly done and creepy uncle Joe is a well earned name.Like I said, for everyone of those videos... I have an Access Hollywood video of Trump boasting that he could grab women by their ***** because he was famous. I can also raise you several rape allegations made against Trump, including one by E. Jean Carroll. I have a video of Trump gawking at women next to Jeffrey Epstein and I have quotes of Trump vouching for what a great guy that Epstein is. You want to play "what-about-ism"? I can play it all day when it comes to Trump's history of disrespecting women. That hand is not a winner for your side in 2020.
Did you know that Donald Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, owns more than a dozen apartment complexes in Baltimore that rent to lower income tenants, which have also been cited for hundreds of code violations? That city definitely has problems and Trump's own family has contributed to the neglect. Ironic, isn't it?Do you think Trump GAS about Maryland or Baltimore? Neither one of them will ever vote Republican, so what's the harm in a tit for tat? I love the Baltimore dis, just another **** hole the dems have created.
You have overreached... nothing Biden is shown doing constitutes "molesting a child".I believe you brought the what aboutism into the conversation. I, however, don't need to go there because the acts of molesting a child on video in front of the world speaks for itself. It's indefensible, it's very very publicly done and creepy uncle Joe is a well earned name.
And pray tell me are their " sides and whataboutisms" when it comes to protecting children?
Counter point, the Dem controlled House is divisive and antagonistic as well. Would you like to call them out for these wasted investigations that detract from their time to address legislation that might actually help the country? Several House members also have a penchant for using Twitter to fight their wars, most notably the Squad. The picture isn't as one sided as you're trying to paint. Trump is a loudmouth bully, but he's not the only one, just the only one you're calling out.Maybe it's further proof of what a divisive and antagonistic figure that Trump is... with all the positives he could be promoting right now, roughly 90% of his tweets are negative in nature. He is either being critical of someone, attacking someone or name-calling. There is no positive message from him. Just a steady stream of grievances and score-settling.
Where's the money??
View attachment 214938
What "EXACTLY" did we get from our $1.8B Obama's bailout of failed democratic cities, and the $16B in grants Trump gave Baltimore in 2018?/QUOTE]
Nobody takes those girls seriously. The President should be held to a higher standard than 3 freshmen members of the House...Counter point, the Dem controlled House is divisive and antagonistic as well. Would you like to call them out for these wasted investigations that detract from their time to address legislation that might actually help the country? Several House members also have a penchant for using Twitter to fight their wars, most notably the Squad. The picture isn't as one sided as you're trying to paint. Trump is a loudmouth bully, but he's not the only one, just the only one you're calling out.
Thank you John. We look forward to having integrity, balance, and a true patriot once again in this dignified position.
LOL! You mean you look forward to having a hyper-partisan, Trump minion in the position who will only report intelligence which Trump wants to hear (which is that Russia did NOT target election systems in all 50 states in 2016 as the Senate panel documented, and will not be attempting to in 2020 either). That is not patriotism. It's political partisanship which has no place at all in our intelligence community. Ratcliffe's grilling of Mueller last week was essentially a dry run for this nomination, after Devin Nunes turned it down (Nunes is holding out for CIA Director in 2021 if Trump is reelected.). Trump wants "Yes, men". Whether or not a nominee is qualified for the position, is purely secondary. "Loyalty" to Trump is all that matters - with "loyalty" being strictly defined as reporting only information that is favorable to Trump and to his desired narrative.
Wait. So it’s congress fault for the debt increase but Trump is handing out the money? Jesus man. So if he is in charge Where The **** is The Money?
You don’t look at it as Trump actions? Why did trump$1.8 Billion from the Renegade...where is it? How much did the Renegade pay in cash to Iran?
$16B in grants from Trump...where is it?
Elijah and ole girl got some 'splainin to do, yes?
You don’t look at it as Trump actions? Why did trump
Give him $16 billion? That’s on trump. Just using your numbers. I haven’t looked into it enough. And yes I know trump didn’t lend “him” the money but you know what I mean
You don’t look at it as Trump actions? Why did trump
Give him $16 billion? That’s on trump. Just using your numbers. I haven’t looked into it enough. And yes I know trump didn’t lend “him” the money but you know what I mean
It probably would be to asking to much to expect the POTUS to actually GAS about all 50 states, not to mention all of those cesspool cities, especially NYC.Do you think Trump GAS about Maryland or Baltimore? Neither one of them will ever vote Republican, so what's the harm in a tit for tat? I love the Baltimore dis, just another **** hole the dems have created.