2018 Midterm Election Thread

Rosendo Noviega, a 38-year-old migrant from Guatemala, part of a caravan of thousands from Central America en route to the United States, holds his daughter Belinda Izabel as he walks along the highway to Juchitan from Santiago Niltepec, Mexico, on October 30,


qhhkxevdsew11.jpg
And why cannot he stop somewhere in MEXICO... where he currently IS WALKING and seek asylum?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
And why cannot he stop somewhere in MEXICO... where he currently IS WALKING and seek asylum?

Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!
 
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!
........ annnnnnd you miss the point.
 
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!
Sounds like the lunatic ravings of some commie, socialist, libtard, globalist, girlie man.
 
Great idea, lets set all policy on poems written in the late 1800s.


The right on the Second Amendment: "The words mean exactly what they say! The language about a militia and the context of the adoption of the Amendment are irrelevant!"

The right on the 14th Amendment: "You have to look at what was going on at the time and change the meaning of the words now because they don't mean what they say."
 
The right on the Second Amendment: "The words mean exactly what they say! The language about a militia and the context of the adoption of the Amendment are irrelevant!"

The right on the 14th Amendment: "You have to look at what was going on at the time and change the meaning of the words now because they don't mean what they say."

WTF does the poem inscribed on the base of the SOL have to do with the constitution?
 
WTF does the poem inscribed on the base of the SOL have to do with the constitution?


I started the post thinking I'd draw a contrast between how you 1) rely zealously on words that are 250 years old and demand that they be adhered to without regard to context when it suits you, but 2) ignore the principle of what was written 150 years ago because its "too old."

But figured it would confuse you.
 
I started the post thinking I'd draw a contrast between how you 1) rely zealously on words that are 250 years old and demand that they be adhered to without regard to context when it suits you, but 2) ignore the principle of what was written 150 years ago because its "too old."

But figured it would confuse you.

1. the 250 year old words are actual canon
2. the 150 year old words are an excerpt from a ****ing poem

See the difference?
 
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

Who is this commie lib? Haha
 
Does the 14th Amendment apply to a person if they are born here while their birth parents are committing a crime by being here in the first place? Just asking

I don't believe the verbiage of the 14th qualifies that, so yes IMO - it'd apply until the SCOTUS says it doesn't.
 
1. the 250 year old words are actual canon
2. the 150 year old words are an excerpt from a ****ing poem

See the difference?

The 14th was ratified in 1868, Lady Liberty was erected in 1875. I'd argue that the national conscious at the time was that the two held hands.
 
I don't believe the verbiage of the 14th qualifies that, so yes IMO - it'd apply until the SCOTUS says it doesn't.
That's my rub with it, but I'm no expert. I don't know if I believe something that was created as to protect rights for those born in this country was meant to extend to those who were born here illegally. You are correct though as the SCOTUS hasn't ruled to make that distinction.
 
The 14th was ratified in 1868, Lady Liberty was erected in 1875. I'd argue that the national conscious at the time was that the two held hands.
But LG's babble was trying to correlate words of law in the 2nd Amendment to words in a poem and trying to say they carried the same weight.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top