2016 Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
Grand. The poll polled 400 republicans. That's 8 people per state. It's a junk poll

Right, of course.

If it's anti-Trump, it's a garbage poll. If it's pro-Trump, it's gospel.

You think the numbers are going to drastically change with higher numbers? What's the magic number you are looking for? 1,000 people? 10,000? A million?
 
If it gets down to a 1v1 Trump is done. That's a yuuuuuge if.

Can't link because I'm on mobile, but there were interesting general election polls today as well. All the GOP candidates beat Clinton head-to-head, and Kasich and Rubio win by almost double digits.

Where at? I'll link it.
 
Right, of course.

If it's anti-Trump, it's a garbage poll. If it's pro-Trump, it's gospel.

You think the numbers are going to drastically change with higher numbers? What's the magic number you are looking for? 1,000 people? 10,000? A million?

Well if the poll only examines Republicans, then it is not really representative of Trump's overall support. Because much of his supporte does not come from not self-described republicans in the first place
 
If it gets down to a 1v1 Trump is done. That's a yuuuuuge if.

Can't link because I'm on mobile, but there were interesting general election polls today as well. All the GOP candidates beat Clinton head-to-head, and Kasich and Rubio win by almost double digits.

Don't many polls have him at 40%? If that's the case even if even drops out, you have to assume none of their supporters would support him. I don't see that. It's sad. It's disgraceful.

But trump will probably win the GOP and Hillary will end up as president
 
Well if the poll only examines Republicans, then it is not really representative of Trump's overall support. Because much of his supporte does not come from not self-described republicans in the first place

It's still the point that 400 people or 400,000, Trump's support is declining. And those on his bandwagon refuse to accept that fact. Cruz "cheated" in Iowa, which is debatable. But it's not the only reason he got put on top. Trump was appealing in the beginning, but got old after a while.

"I self fund and don't spend any money, Jeb spends eleventy billion and sucks at the polls."

"It's going to be great. I'm building a wall."

"The establishment is out to get me. That's why I'm being booed."

Blah, blah, blah, blah. He's predictable and people are starting to listen to others. And it's showing in the support as well as the polls.

And thanks for changing the font.
 
It's still the point that 400 people or 400,000, Trump's support is declining. And those on his bandwagon refuse to accept that fact. Cruz "cheated" in Iowa, which is debatable. But it's not the only reason he got put on top. Trump was appealing in the beginning, but got old after a while.

"I self fund and don't spend any money, Jeb spends eleventy billion and sucks at the polls."

"It's going to be great. I'm building a wall."

"The establishment is out to get me. That's why I'm being booed."

Blah, blah, blah, blah. He's predictable and people are starting to listen to others. And it's showing in the support as well as the polls.

And thanks for changing the font.

You'reexactly right. Trump is just a big soundbite and its wearing thin. He never answers the question on any plans he has just "It's going to be great".
 
Where at? I'll link it.

I managed to get to a computer. :)

Poll: Sanders has slight edge over Clinton in matchups with GOP opponents

In hypothetical matchups in the general election:

• Clinton loses by 2 points to Trump (43%-45%), 1 point to Cruz (44%-45%), 6 points to Rubio (42%-48%) and 11 points to Kasich (38%-49%). That's a weaker standing than the former secretary of State showed in December's survey, when she narrowly led Trump and Cruz and trailed Rubio by just 2 points.

• Sanders loses by 1 point to Trump (43%-44%), 3 points to Kasich (41%-44%) and 4 points to Rubio (42%-46%) — each of them a slightly stronger showing than Clinton — and he leads Cruz by 2 points (44%-42%).
 
Don't many polls have him at 40%? If that's the case even if even drops out, you have to assume none of their supporters would support him. I don't see that. It's sad. It's disgraceful.

But trump will probably win the GOP and Hillary will end up as president

Not only that, but his favorables are so low - even among GOP voters, he's just barely over .500. That's not the type of candidate that will unite a party.
 
Oh no what will we do if you resume colored fonts!?!? Try using brown that way it'll be a good representative of what most of your posts are.

Wait weren't you the guy that assumed I was black? So I guess regular font color should be agreeable to you then.
 
Wait weren't you the guy that assumed I was black? So I guess regular font color should be agreeable to you then.

Still couldn't comprehend what I was saying can you, fool? And to answer your first post, no I'm not mad, never was. It wasn't just me that showed you how ignorant you are on reparations it was everyone in that thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Still couldn't comprehend what I was saying can you, fool? And to answer your first post, no I'm not mad, never was. It wasn't just me that showed you how ignorant you are on reparations it was everyone in that thread.

Yea, you specifically said you assumed I was black. Maybe you were posting in "code" though, never know.
 
Yea, you specifically said you assumed I was black. Maybe you were posting in "code" though, never know.

First, I'm not going to help you hijack this thread and second, your drivel is not the least bit amusing nor is it relevant in any serious conversation. You're either a troll who wants to just get a rise out of people or just really misinformed, clueless and downright dumb. Personally I'll go with the latter. And you mentioned earlier the ignore feature and hopefully I won't be the only one to use it and we can be rid of you once and for all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top