VolsNSkinsFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 15,813
- Likes
- 3,974
Wow, the National Review just came out strongly opposing Trump in their latest issue.
National Review aims to take down Trump - POLITICO
When you come right down to it, that task rests with the Congress, and they are still an abysmal failure. However... if Trump will put our money where his mouth is... so to speak... he has a better chance of doing that with a friendly Congress. Ryan knows that Dumbo will veto anything that doesn't fit his agenda, so at this point real cutting is not possible. Time will tell, but one thing for certain, Cankles will only drive up spending and the war on us working people.
So what? Some asshat just won potentially $500 million dollars in the lottery. What he does with it is what matters. most lottery winners are idiots and broke again within a few years (Although I cannot comprehend of any way to piss away that kind of money shy of converting it to paper and setting it on fire) Trump, obviously, is not.If nothing else, he inherited more than any of us.
But they still supported him in poll after poll. Women love BC. Democrat... women. Actually I think banging ML was pure genius on his part. She was everywoman, and that made all the leftist women believe that if she (ML) could have that kind of man... they could. Had he been doing supermodels, they would have called to cut off his nuts in the public square.They didn't have a chance to vote for him after ML, IIRC.
That's what I just don't get. Look at this thread for instance - the moment it's pointed out that Trump is a RINO, his supporters are quick to redirect to "what a great business man he is". Which is great, if we were a board of directors hiring a CEO to run a for profit corporation. Only we're not.