mrorange211
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 6,560
- Likes
- 7,431
If we allow the government to determine what weapons we can and should have; how do we protect ourselves from the government?
I don't think we can protect ourselves as it is. It's the delusion of safety, much like seat belts on a plane I guess. There's is no way I could protect myself from the government if they really wanted to get me. No. Way.
Sorry. had to teach about the Homestead strike for a minute.
I don't disagree, but I also don't feel like I am living in a tyrannical government, and I also believe it would be almost impossible for one to be established. I believe that in large part because of our many independent new agencies that report whatever gets them views, with no hesitancy, especially so, when it comes to the govt. Therefore, establishing a tyrannt would be incredibly difficult, and ultimately why someone like Trump will not win. Now, once freedom of press is curtailed majorly by government influence, that's when I will be scared. Otherwise, I believe it just makes common sense for the govt to institute some common sense gun laws to help (hopefully) curb some violence in the streets. While I wholeheartedly support Rand, and have even contributed to his campaign financially, this is where we disagree. But even in that disagreement, I understand his position and can see the logic in it.
Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal and Ben Carson are all racist
You have far more confidence in the media than I do
What limits do we have on the 1st? Can't yell fire in a theater?
Barry Goldwater lamented that the GOP was being taken over by the religious right, and he was completely correct. It helped win elections a few decades ago but in this era of shifting demographics it has locked the party into a no-win situation as conservatism has become synonymous with moral superiority in the name of religion. They either lose at least some of the reliable voting bloc of evangelicals or keep them at the expense of attracting new voters.
Trump is the first time in a while we've seen a populist movement gain so much steam in the GOP. He has no political principles whatsoever, and is probably the most liberal candidate on the GOP side on most issues, but he has found popularity because people are sick of the status quo and really don't like how traditional America has come under fire. It's kind of a watershed moment, but I think things may get worse before they get better. The party just has no unifying vision and anyone who deviates from the alpha "true conservative" prototype even by a little is mocked and derided. Imagine if Reagan ran today - Trump supporters would be calling him an establishment stooge.
There is way more diversity of thoughts/beliefs in the R party than there is in the far left socialist party we call democrats. JFK would not be allowed in todays democrat party
What's crazy is that hispanics are actually a very conservative people. Hispanics in Florida is what won Bush the election in 2000. It's just insane because this is the new demographic the Reps should try their best to appeal to the most; it wouldn't even be that hard. It's almost like the Reps are trying to do exactly what will guarantee them a loss in Nov and every other foreseeable presidential election in the future.
What's crazy is that hispanics are actually a very conservative people. Hispanics in Florida is what won Bush the election in 2000. It's just insane because this is the new demographic the Reps should try their best to appeal to the most; it wouldn't even be that hard. It's almost like the Reps are trying to do exactly what will guarantee them a loss in Nov and every other foreseeable presidential election in the future.
One of the biggest lies in American politics today is the notion that being against illegal immigration is the same thing as being xenophobic against all Hispanics.
