2016 Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,333
#1,333
FLVOL69 said:
You're the one who brought up amnesty, Obama's bs xo is being held up by a federal judge. You want amnesty, leave it up to the congress.
Click to expand...

Actually, i didn't bring it up.

You"re all over the placeand it's getting worse after you told us to stick to the topic.

Go back and read that interview of Paul and stop wasting time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,336
#1,336
n_huffhines said:
Actually, i didn't bring it up.

You"re all over the placeand it's getting worse after you told us to stick to the topic.

Go back and read that interview of Paul and stop wasting time.
Click to expand...

You're the one who threw Reagan's name out there, I'm merely contrasting his actions versus our supreme leader. If you're so hell bent on amnesty I suggest you open up your house and bedroom to Jorge and the rest of his compadres.I'm not going to waste my time reading rand Paul's amnesty bill, he'll never be elected to enforce it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,337
#1,337
The frustrating thing about Paul is people don't even know when they agree with him. They assume that just cause he said something, it's wrong. When you compare it to what others are saying or have done, you realize just how reasonable it is.

This is not the first time this week somebody criticized Paul about XO, while simultaneously 100% agreeing with his actual position

It's madness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,338
#1,338
FLVOL69 said:
You're the one who threw Reagan's name out there, I'm merely contrasting his actions versus our supreme leader. If you're so hell bent on amnesty I suggest you open up your house and bedroom to Jorge and the rest of his compadres.not going to waste my time reading rand Paul's amnesty bill, he'll never be elected to enforce it.
Click to expand...

More time wasting nonsense. I threw Reagan's name out there to demonstrate that Paul is like Reagan in this regard...so why are you adding to that? What is the point of bringing up Obama?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#1,339
#1,339
n_huffhines said:
More time wasting nonsense. I threw Reagan's name out there to demonstrate that Paul is like Reagan in this regard...so why are you adding to that? What is the point of bringing up Obama?
Click to expand...

Obama granted amnesty by executive order, Reagan did not. Rand Paul's not fit to hold Reagan's jock..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,340
#1,340
FLVOL69 said:
Obama granted amnesty by executive order, Reagan did not.
Click to expand...

What does this have to with the 2016 field of candidates? Rand will not xo like Reagan. The other 12 will xo like Obama. That's the truth but i doubt that is what you are trying to say.

Just trying to figure out what your point is about Obama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#1,341
#1,341
n_huffhines said:
What does this have to with the 2016 field of candidates? Rand will not xo like Reagan. The other 12 will xo like Obama. That's the truth but i doubt that is what you are trying to say.

Just trying to figure out what your point is about Obama.
Click to expand...

Reagan granted amnesty the Right Way, Obama did it by executive order, which is being challenged by the courts as we speak. In my opinion all immigration should be stopped for a period of time until we get a grasp on things, just like we did after the huge mass immigrations of the 20s in the 30s. I know you're a Paul supporter, but unfortunately for you he doesn't stand a ****ing chance. So you better start looking around the field. The economy and immigration are going to be the two highlights of this election not to mention Obamacare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,342
#1,342
Our Congress could get their fingers out of their azz and pass immigration reform which would replace Obama's EO.

I don't think neither side is all gun ho to put their name on immigration reform due to the political consequences and are silently thankful Obama did his EO. It got the monkey off their backs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,345
#1,345
Paul and Reagan are very similar on immigration and the middle east. It's so weird that Rs are terrified of his policies.
 
#1,346
#1,346
Gramps said:
Our Congress could get their fingers out of their azz and pass immigration reform which would replace Obama's EO.

I don't think neither side is all gun ho to put their name on immigration reform due to the political consequences and are silently thankful Obama did his EO. It got the monkey off their backs.
Click to expand...

They were correct not to grab the new 3rd rail. Republican voters don't want reform/amnesty they want the current laws enforced, control of the border and then see what reforms are necessary. The people who are polling for Trump prove that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,348
#1,348
IPleadInsanity said:
They were correct not to grab the new 3rd rail. Republican voters don't want reform/animosity they want the current laws enforced, control of the border and then see what reforms are necessary. The people who are polling for Trump prove that.
Click to expand...

But the reality is the current laws will NEVER be enforced. It's not even financially feasible, let alone politically expedient.

Trump's plan to deport illegals would cost like 10x the federal law enforcement budget.

Xenophobia trumps fiscal conservatism. Pun intended
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,349
#1,349
n_huffhines said:
But the reality is the current laws will NEVER be enforced. It's not even financially feasible, let alone politically expedient.

Trump's plan to deport illegals would cost like 10x the federal law enforcement budget.

Xenophobia trumps fiscal conservatism. Pun intended
Click to expand...

Trump wants to build a wall, make E-Verify the law, and you stop subsidies to illegal immigrants.No EBT cards no nothing. No money,no work,they go home. There are enough legal immigrants here to fill the work positions. It's not just a matter of immigration it's a matter of national ****ing security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#1,350
#1,350
FLVOL69 said:
Trump wants to build a wall, make E-Verify the law, and you stop subsidies to illegal immigrants.No EBT cards no nothing. No money,no work,they go home. There are enough legal immigrants here to fill the work positions. It's not just a matter of immigration it's a matter of national ****ing security.
Click to expand...

Other than a wall, none of that sounds like security. Millions of positions are not going to get filled. Are you on crack?

Rand Paul is very serious about border security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top