2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#9,001
#9,001
tumscalcium said:
There are plenty of reports that implicate the government. Do you remember the missing 28 pages? People are afraid that the Saufi ties will have to come out in court. This is well known. Shouldn't have to be pointed out at every turn to you.

What reports implicate the government with the OKC bombings? None? Yeah.

You tied the government with the OKC bombing just because the perps were American. Thus I tied black people with the deterioration of America to show the hole in your ridiculous logic.

I can't continually have to explain every well known thing for you. Put your big boy pants on.
Click to expand...

They aren't missing anymore.
 
#9,004
#9,004
hog88 said:
Are these the same intel agencies that now serve as political puppets instead of the country?
Click to expand...

Actually, I was wondering if it's the same intelligence agencies that would get into hot water for leaking such classified briefs to the media...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,009
#9,009
carlos86 said:
For people that say demographics don't matter.

Trump is losing college educated white women to Clinton by 25 points. No Get out the vote effort will turnout enough White working class men to close that gap. If this continues Clinton will far more likely to match the Obama '12 coalition than Trump is to recreate the Romney coalition.
Click to expand...

Funny that the college educated people I personally know including myself don't support Clinton, but then I don't tend to hang around with liberals with worthless liberal arts degrees. That group seems to be the ones waiting tables and manhandling cash registers rather than in professions requiring meaningful degrees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,011
#9,011
AM64 said:
Funny that the college educated people I personally know including myself don't support Clinton, but then I don't tend to hang around with liberals with worthless liberal arts degrees. That group seems to be the ones waiting tables and manhandling cash registers rather than in professions requiring meaningful degrees.
Click to expand...

What state do you live in???
 
#9,013
#9,013
AM64 said:
TN; guess you got me there - not one of the left coast or northeast liberal havens, and everybody knows we in the southeast are just uneducated rednecks regardless of what we do.
Click to expand...

LOL I don't think its that. The Republican candidate for President has won white college educated voters every election since 1980 except for 2008. And in 2012 Romney won college educated women 52%-48%. Trump seems to have a huge problem with suburban white college educated women which is why there is a 25 point gap in that demographic between Trump and Clinton.
 
Last edited:
#9,014
#9,014
carlos86 said:
LOL I don't its that. The Republican candidate for President has won white college educated voters every election since 1980 except for 2008. And in 2012 Romney won college educated women 52%-48%. Trump seems to have a huge problem with suburban white college educated women which is why there is a 25 point gap in that demographic between Trump and Clinton.
Click to expand...

Um, I'm happy to be the one to break it to you , but women are ridiculously sexist. There are many good ones, but not enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,015
#9,015
tumscalcium said:
There are plenty of reports that implicate the government. Do you remember the missing 28 pages? People are afraid that the Saufi ties will have to come out in court. This is well known. Shouldn't have to be pointed out at every turn to you.

What reports implicate the government with the OKC bombings? None? Yeah.

You tied the government with the OKC bombing just because the perps were American. Thus I tied black people with the deterioration of America to show the hole in your ridiculous logic.

I can't continually have to explain every well known thing for you. Put your big boy pants on.
Click to expand...

You logic is just as stupid as mine, except the fact I know mine is stupid and you feel like you made an intelligent comment
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#9,016
#9,016
Sin City Vol said:
You logic is just as stupid as mine, except the fact I know mine is stupid and you feel like you made an intelligent comment
Click to expand...

It was an attempt at a save. I'll give you the attempt. The save not so much, but the attempt was there. That has to account for something, maybe....

Have you told your kids the dangers of hanging out with other black kids yet? If not, you suck ass at statistics.
 
#9,017
#9,017
USA Today editorial board does not endorse Trump or Clinton. Instead they go full #neverTrump and urge readers to vote for anyone but Trump.

USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'

"Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency."

"Whether through indifference or ignorance, Trump has betrayed fundamental commitments made by all presidents since the end of World War II. These commitments include unwavering support for NATO allies, steadfast opposition to Russian aggression, and the absolute certainty that the United States will make good on its debts. He has expressed troubling admiration for authoritarian leaders and scant regard for constitutional protections."

"Trump has been on so many sides of so many issues that attempting to assess his policy positions is like shooting at a moving target. A list prepared by NBC details 124 shifts by Trump on 20 major issues since shortly before he entered the race. He simply spouts slogans and outcomes"

"He is ill-equipped to be commander in chief. Trump’s foreign policy pronouncements typically range from uninformed to incoherent. It’s not just Democrats who say this. Scores of Republican national security leaders have signed an extraordinary open letter calling Trump’s foreign policy vision “wildly inconsistent and unmoored in principle.” In a Wall Street Journal column this month, Robert Gates, the highly respected former Defense secretary who served presidents of both parties over a half-century, described Trump as “beyond repair.”

"He’s a serial liar. Although polls show that Clinton is considered less honest and trustworthy than Trump, it’s not even a close contest. Trump is in a league of his own when it comes to the quality and quantity of his misstatements. When confronted with a falsehood, such as his assertion that he was always against the Iraq War, Trump’s reaction is to use the Big Lie technique of repeating it so often that people begin to believe it.

We are not unmindful of the issues that Trump’s campaign has exploited: the disappearance of working-class jobs; excessive political correctness; the direction of the Supreme Court; urban unrest and street violence; the rise of the Islamic State terrorist group; gridlock in Washington and the influence of moneyed interests. All are legitimate sources of concern."

"Nor does this editorial represent unqualified support for Hillary Clinton, who has her own flaws (though hers are far less likely to threaten national security or lead to a constitutional crisis). The Editorial Board does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement.

Some of us look at her command of the issues, resilience and long record of public service — as first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of State — and believe she’d serve the nation ably as its president.

Other board members have serious reservations about Clinton’s sense of entitlement, her lack of candor and her extreme carelessness in handling classified information.

Where does that leave us? Our bottom-line advice for voters is this: Stay true to your convictions. That might mean a vote for Clinton, the most plausible alternative to keep Trump out of the White House. Or it might mean a third-party candidate. Or a write-in. Or a focus on down-ballot candidates who will serve the nation honestly, try to heal its divisions, and work to solve its problems.

Whatever you do, however, resist the siren song of a dangerous demagogue. By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump."
 
#9,025
#9,025
tumscalcium said:
With more and more and more illegals with the downfall of the U.S. In mind. Coincidence?
Click to expand...

Actually, DHS says there were more in 2007 than today.

more-you-know.jpg


:salute:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top