hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 121,387
- Likes
- 179,579
Yes, some of them are disrespectful and idiotic runts; I don't care whether or not they served in our nation's military.
Again, serving in our military is not a "Get out of jail" free card, as you must think.
Cutting military spending would be a disaster unless the cuts were specific to certain aspects
But they're not going to dig deep. They're going to keep letting pencil pushers eat up the budget while the man on the ground and vets continue to get the shaft.There's no reason to cut military spending, all they need to do is get rid of the FWA and free loaders who are just milking a check till they have enough issues for disability.
I am sure most of you who served can name numerous incidents where crazy amounts of money was wasted on something ridiculous. High ranking officials traveling with an entourage, crap just laying around never getting used, and plenty of other crap. I remember early on in my career they would have weekly base clean up crews comprised of young enlisted members. Now that's all contracted out, probably paying someone twice as much as they pay an E-3.
Tons of wasteful spending in the military, let them dig deep and they can make some legit cutbacks and use some of the money more effectively.
But they're not going to dig deep. They're going to keep letting pencil pushers eat up the budget while the man on the ground and vets continue to get the shaft.
There's no reason to cut military spending, all they need to do is get rid of the FWA and free loaders who are just milking a check till they have enough issues for disability.
I am sure most of you who served can name numerous incidents where crazy amounts of money was wasted on something ridiculous. High ranking officials traveling with an entourage, crap just laying around never getting used, and plenty of other crap. I remember early on in my career they would have weekly base clean up crews comprised of young enlisted members. Now that's all contracted out, probably paying someone twice as much as they pay an E-3.
Tons of wasteful spending in the military, let them dig deep and they can make some legit cutbacks and use some of the money more effectively.
Donald Trump set off a fierce new controversy Tuesday with remarks about the right to bear arms that were interpreted by many as a threat of violence against Hillary Clinton.
"Hillary wants to abolish -- essentially abolish the Second Amendment. By the way, if she gets to pick, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know," Trump said.
Here comes another media s***storm.
Trump: 'Second Amendment people' could deal with Clinton - CNNPolitics.com
Here comes another media s***storm.
Trump: 'Second Amendment people' could deal with Clinton - CNNPolitics.com
Here comes another media s***storm.
Trump: 'Second Amendment people' could deal with Clinton - CNNPolitics.com
Saw that. It's plastered all over CNN and the writer used Trump's vague comment as a call for harm against her.
It's Trump's mistake for not going into detail about his comment, i.e. as a legislative issue/NRA members, etc. but for that journalist to begin speculating and printing that it's a call for assassination, ********* believable!
He's either sabotaging his campaign or simply isn't very bright.
Yet not a word about Mateen the gay hater being behind hiLIARy at a rally.
The media is all out to get Trump, they are running scared trying to plaster anything they can on Trump. What would they do if Trump didn't say a word for a few days? They'd probably make **** up for a headline.
He's either sabotaging his campaign or simply isn't very bright.