2016 Election Thread Part Deux

  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
No what's weak is dancing in Argentina while Americans involved in the Brussels terrorist attack are still missing.

Obama would never interrupt a good time for matters of importance, and the clueless who elected him wouldn't understand why he should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
When I say the Super Pac that used the picture has no affiliation with Cruz I'm saying none. They are an Anti- Trump PAC who are affiliated with Rand Paul and Paul, Gov. Walker

Regardless of who they are, it's that kind of behavior that deters competent leaders from becoming candidates. So we are left with egotistical scum shoveling dirt on each other.
 
When I say the Super Pac that used the picture has no affiliation with Cruz I'm saying none. They are an Anti- Trump PAC who are affiliated with Rand Paul and Paul, Gov. Walker

So your saying the guy some consider the pure symbol of conservatism Rand Paul is a bigger scumbag than Cruz?
 
Easily. Good new for him. If that number is accurate, it is only going to grow as the GOP implodes.

I believe that Ross Perot got 8% and that's the most a 3rd party ever got? IDK, I'm working off memory. If GJ is at double digits without even campaigning, that's pretty significant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I believe that Ross Perot got 8% and that's the most a 3rd party ever got? IDK, I'm working off memory. If GJ is at double digits without even campaigning, that's pretty significant.

Him not campaigning helps him.

And BTW at the end of the day he'll finish well under 10%.
 
I believe that Ross Perot got 8% and that's the most a 3rd party ever got? IDK, I'm working off memory. If GJ is at double digits without even campaigning, that's pretty significant.

I was curious, so I looked it up. Perot received 18.9% in 1992 and 8.4% in 1996. Johnson's numbers are high at the moment for a third party candidate. It speaks to the lackluster candidates in this cycle.
 
The more he talks the better he looks. He's not one of these unprincipled fools and he's more mature and pragmatic than Rand.

I voted for Johnson in '12 but he is basically unknown to most voters, Rand is not. Most people know who Paul is if nothing else from him being Ron's son.
 

VN Store



Back
Top